Remove Minimum Heatsinks From Sub 30 Ton 'mechs
#1
Posted 18 November 2013 - 02:35 PM
This results in 'mechs like the Locust losing precious, precious tonnage on adding heatsinks they can't even use, making an already troubled 'mech even worse!
I think that the lightest mechs should be exempt from this rule, in order to give them some fighting chance of putting together a decent 'mech, given they are capped to very small engines in the first place. It'd be a much, much needed buff to these ultra light designs!
#2
Posted 18 November 2013 - 02:37 PM
Edited by FupDup, 18 November 2013 - 02:38 PM.
#3
Posted 18 November 2013 - 03:00 PM
Cake: If you eat it now, you won't have it later. Deal with it.
#4
Posted 18 November 2013 - 04:22 PM
There should be no exceptions to the minimum heat sinks rule.
#5
Posted 18 November 2013 - 04:23 PM
#6
Posted 18 November 2013 - 04:33 PM
#7
Posted 18 November 2013 - 06:13 PM
Durant Carlyle, on 18 November 2013 - 04:22 PM, said:
There should be no exceptions to the minimum heat sinks rule.
MW4 just had two buttons for heat sinks, an arrow up for more heat sinks, and an arrow down for less heat sinks. That being said MW4 is an awesome game.
#8
Posted 19 November 2013 - 01:38 AM
#9
Posted 19 November 2013 - 03:40 AM
The super lights need every bit of weight they can scrounge and a few extra tons can go a long way in helping make them more viable against the big boy lights. The 25 tonners and 20 tonners have to make noticeable tradeoffs in armor/weapons/or speed where as the 35 tonners can normally get the best of all at once.
#10
Posted 19 November 2013 - 04:06 AM
#11
Posted 19 November 2013 - 05:18 PM
and making special rules just for a weight class makes even less sense since a 200 engine is still a 200 engine wherever it goes. the limit also serves to strengthen the advantages of having a larger engine since another 2kph wont exactly do much for you as opposed to 2kph and 1-3 free slots
#12
Posted 21 November 2013 - 12:13 PM
#13
Posted 21 November 2013 - 12:30 PM
#14
Posted 23 November 2013 - 02:17 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users