A Few Odd Questions About "according To Lore"
#1
Posted 01 December 2013 - 06:26 PM
so lets just get on with it.
According to lore... (not ingame mechanics...)
1. What happens if you over equip a mech beyond its max tonnage? Say, load a catapult with 70 tons of equipment when it is a 65 ton mech?
2. What happens if you don't use up all the tonnage? will a 60 ton mech with a 300 engine and only 50 tons of weight loaded go as quick as a fully loaded 50 tonner using a 300 engine?
3. Why do a tiny 20 ton mech have the same internal space as a huge 100 ton mech? (if not more due to lack of hand and lower arm actuators.)
4. How does a mech counterbalance the unbalanced weight from loading all weapons on one side? Energy/ballistic loaded highlander for example. or why not a Yen-Lo-Wang with a 14 ton heavy cannon loaded in the arm and nothing in the other side?
#2
Posted 01 December 2013 - 06:43 PM
2. We always played that unused tonnage increased the mechs speed. There was a formula, no idea what is now.
3. I figured it was to help game play and balance/simplicity.
4. Gyros, more gyros, and the pilot under the neuro-helmet. During gameplay if your mech lost a lot of armor and weapon tonnage you had to roll to see if you stayed upright.
One from me now... Is this the Funkybacon from Eve?
Grisha
3rd Takata Lancers
#3
Posted 01 December 2013 - 06:47 PM
1. Can't happen. Once you reach the tonnage limit you are done building. A mech over it's weight limit would never be on the table.
2. Nothing. Don't remember if this was strictly verboten in TT rules, but more importantly weight reduction does not increase top speed in vehicles. Weight reduction improves acceleration/deceleration and can improve handling characteristics if done correctly. In other words, reducing overall weight will not cause the legs of a battlemech to articulate any faster. (this was how we played it, though "House Rules" vary from group to group)
3. 1980s Sci-Fi "Science" and Game Balance.
(oh yeah, forgot about that set of pilot rolls)
(edits)
Edited by Bagheera, 01 December 2013 - 06:50 PM.
#4
Posted 01 December 2013 - 07:07 PM
2. According to the lore, the computers controlling a 'Mech are programmed with what tonnage it's supposed to be and what the speed limits are. They are designed to only go a certain speed no matter whether the 'Mech is fully equipped or not.
3. In the lore, they don't. It's purely a game-mechanics thing. There are optional rules in an official expansion where critical slots are limited by weight class (lights have the least amount and only assaults have the default amount).
4. A MechWarrior wears a neurohelmet which connects his sense of balance to the gyro. By default, there are no piloting rolls for an unbalanced loadout. There are only rolls if you take a certain amount of damage in a turn (20 points IIRC).
#5
Posted 01 December 2013 - 07:20 PM
But for question 1 again there must have been some instance in lore when someone tried loading more than it was built for. And I doubt loading one more ton of ammo over the limit would cause it to break down and It is war after all, some pilots are likely to not play by the rules set for them and try loading some extra firepower or ammo in their mechs. Must be some rules for it somewhere (even if they'd be un-official rules).
2. Yeah that would make sense for the mech to operate at one set speed at all time to avoid odd behavior during battle.
4. Think I understand. Still, I kinda think of it as trying to run around with a fully loaded grocery bag in one hand and nothing in the other. xD
And no, Grisha. I am not the DJ FunkyBacon. Although I do get that question a lot.
#6
Posted 01 December 2013 - 07:37 PM
If we had an internal gyroscope, we would have much better balance too. I remember this fun gyroscope toy from when I was a kid -- set it to spinning and you could balance it on a piece of string. I can easily imagine a multi-ton gyro balancing 20 tons on one side and zero tons on the other just fine, especially with a human sense of balance controlling it.
Edited by Durant Carlyle, 01 December 2013 - 07:37 PM.
#7
Posted 01 December 2013 - 08:12 PM
TRO:3058 said:
2. Answered.
3. In lore and reality mass does not equal volume. The Thorn is a 20 ton light 'Mech and its original 3050 fluff illustrates this. Note the Thorn has an Endo-Steel internal structure which one might think would make it more cramped since Endo-Steel does demand more volume, but internal layout counts big on this one.
TRO:3050 said:
There are tables from Maximum Tech that reduce space in a 'Mech based on weight class with only Assault being unaltered. Note that they make some canon light designs illegal. There were also no tables provided for quads.
4. 'Mechs are normally counterweighted internally in addition to gyros though game construction rules do not explicitly reflect this. The Blitzkrieg mounts an Ultra AC/20 in its left side as its sole weapon and fluff illustrates the use of counterweights.
TRO:3060 said:
The current rules set now include the Unbalanced design quirk for those new 'Mechs where the designers skipped installing counterweights. The quirk actually forces piloting rolls in situations where they are not normally required. Or it adds penalties/increased to hit numbers to piloting rolls in many normal situations.
If it is a basic design rule, implied in the construction rules, or covered in the game rules there is probably official fluff or story somewhere giving an at least somewhat believable reason.
Edited by Nathan Foxbane, 01 December 2013 - 09:20 PM.
#8
Posted 01 December 2013 - 09:16 PM
So for example, a 35 ton Jenner with an XL 300 is (300/35)*16.2= 138.86 KPH
And with MWO to get the Speed Tweaked value multiply by 1.1: 138.86*1.1= 152.7 KPH
It would be interesting if speed was dynamic in MWO going underweight on a mech, doubtful we'd see something like that though.
#9
Posted 01 December 2013 - 09:37 PM
Praetor Shepard, on 01 December 2013 - 09:16 PM, said:
So for example, a 35 ton Jenner with an XL 300 is (300/35)*16.2= 138.86 KPH
And with MWO to get the Speed Tweaked value multiply by 1.1: 138.86*1.1= 152.7 KPH
It would be interesting if speed was dynamic in MWO going underweight on a mech, doubtful we'd see something like that though.
And for good reason. A Catapult K2 with 4 MLs, 2 MGs w/1 ton of ammo, 11 DHS, endo, 412 points of ferro armor, and a 315XL would haul tail at around 140 kph. That's light mech speed with heavy mech armor. Would you really want to deal with a Jenner with almost double armor?
#10
Posted 01 December 2013 - 09:48 PM
Escef, on 01 December 2013 - 09:37 PM, said:
That should come out to 40 tons and no Jump Jets, more like an over grown Cicada.
But yeah doubtful the devs would allow that.
#11
Posted 02 December 2013 - 12:40 AM
Whether or not you could stuff a couple of tons of ammo extra into a 'mech to make it overweight, that's easy to say no to due to space limitations. There's just no room for anything over the limit. If you wanted to carry that ammo in crates slung from the torso, that would be fine, but of course it wouldn't be available for firing until you'd gone through reload operations.
And for the other end, gaining speed because you've shot off your 12 tons of ammo; no, the 'mech is designed to go a certain speed and won't go faster under any circumstances. Actuators, joints, internal structure, and the myomers themselves aren't designed for it.
#12
Posted 02 December 2013 - 01:39 AM
Do the TW rules on reducing crit space also reduce the requirements for ES/FF? It seems like it would make sense... they ought to take up volume depending on the 'mech itself. I can even see the argument for DHS taking fewer slots on a 'mech with more surface area to volume (smaller, generally). Really, a lot of stuff, including much of the bulkiest stuff, ought to be scaled to the 'mech. AC/20 taking up the same space on a Raven arm as a HGN is probably wrong though.
#13
Posted 02 December 2013 - 02:21 AM
As someone else stated, those rules make some canon 'Mechs illegal. I know some of my Locusts are right at the default critical slot limit, so I wouldn't like those rules.
#14
Posted 02 December 2013 - 02:31 AM
stjobe, on 02 December 2013 - 12:40 AM, said:
Whether or not you could stuff a couple of tons of ammo extra into a 'mech to make it overweight, that's easy to say no to due to space limitations. There's just no room for anything over the limit. If you wanted to carry that ammo in crates slung from the torso, that would be fine, but of course it wouldn't be available for firing until you'd gone through reload operations.
And for the other end, gaining speed because you've shot off your 12 tons of ammo; no, the 'mech is designed to go a certain speed and won't go faster under any circumstances. Actuators, joints, internal structure, and the myomers themselves aren't designed for it.
There is actually a scenario in one of the module books (not sure if its Grey Death Legion, Snords Irregulars or of of the other early books) where you have to carry salvaged gear and each mech could carry a certain amount based on tonnage. Any shot at the mech could destroy the carried items. Bad idea for extra ammo to be carried.
The lore reason for a mech not going faster as it gets lighter (ammo spent, armor or arms being blown off) is the legs are calibrated to move at a certain speed based on the tonnage. Sadly legged chassies are not as simple as wheeled chassies and cannot be expected to go faster just cause the vehicle is a little lighter. At least not with the tech level of the inner sphere.
If you think about it. Take an olympic sprinter and time his speed, now cut ten pound of unneccessary meat off him, ignoring the whole dying/pain aspect- he would not really be able to run faster. There is a point where muscle build up/body weight and speed peak. That peak is where mechs are designed to operate.
Also, the internal structure chart is standardized for ease of gameplay. There are optional rules out there somewhere where an 80 tonner does have twice the internal space of a 20 tonner. I played with them and it was silly cause a number of existing light mechs didn;t fit their chassie and you could make an atlas with 2 ac/20s in one arm.
Silly rules are sometimes necessary for better game play.
Here is a good question: According to the faqs of the FASA team in the 80s, why does the machine gun have a range of 90 meters?
#15
Posted 02 December 2013 - 09:40 AM
So in lore there are some instances where mechs could be piloted outside of their abilities but usually ended up breaking very quickly afterwards. This and since it really is the computer piloting the mech with the pilot’s inputs, makes it believable as to why there are speed limits.
Another thing that makes sense is that the weight limit for mechs is based upon battle conditions. The mechs and all of their parts are designed to handle a certain way during battle conditions, which are much harder on the machine but out of combat they could be repurposed to accomplish other tasks with little to no damage; like a 65 ton machine carrying 5 to 10 tons on it. The trick to accomplish this is the mech is working at a walking speed or slower (less stress on joints), and is not taking enemy fire. You can try it sometime by putting 100lb (45kg) on your back and noticing the difference on you when you walk and run with that load.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users