Bishop Steiner, on 11 December 2013 - 08:24 AM, said:
ah latter day(well, as in post Babylon) Germanic Nimrod worship! Got it! Tis so entertaining to me to see the blind adherence so many people put toward things they don't even remotely understand, ja?
Haha, Scandinavians don't really end their sentences with "ja", except in Hollywood, where Scandinavian = German = Dutch and Italian = Spanish = Portugese. Anyway, I don't really consider the popular adherence to holidays like Christmas, Easter or even Valentine's Day a sign of "blindness" or ignorance, even though people don't understand their origins. It's like those Christians who will argue that certain Norwegian holidays are actually connected to ancient Norse rituals, which means false idols, which means you're guilty of devil worship.
To me, it doesn't really matter if Christmas can be traced back to some proto-Indoeuropean day of worship when they used to kill kittens by drowning them in big barrels of wet squirrels. Christmas means whatever I want it to mean. I would prefer to live in a society where we have secular holidays based on our modern scientific and humanistic views instead of religion and commercialism, but I'm not going to go off on my own and celebrate Festivus either.
I don't mean to go off on a tangent here, but since I started a thread with X-mas in the title, I may as well explain myself. The bottom line is: X-mas means whatever people want it to mean. There's no need to bring romans or jewish rabbi into this. Everyone knows the only true god is Santa Claus.
Shar Wolf, on 11 December 2013 - 10:23 AM, said:
I
believe it is actually a case by case decision on the part of the copyright owners.
I think it has more to do with local jurisdiction, looking at Wikipedia. If it was up to the copyright owners, then someone would be free to say
"This product will be protected by copyright for.... one billion years."
Shar Wolf, on 11 December 2013 - 10:23 AM, said:
Edit: P-D without the - is censored.... and I am wracking my brain trying to figure out what that would be used for that would need censoring (it is the first thing I have not been able to see why for <---and that was phrased BADLY)
One of several inexplicable examples of censorship on this forum.