Jump to content

Ideas For Clan Currency


34 replies to this topic

#21 CyclonerM

    Tina's Warrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • 5,685 posts
  • LocationA 2nd Wolf Guards Grenadiers JumpShip

Posted 19 December 2013 - 05:27 AM

View Postsj mausgmr, on 18 December 2013 - 03:47 PM, said:

It will be cbills.

That's why those packaged mechs have a cbill bonus.


I refuse to acknowdlege it. Probably they have still to design this part of CW. Clanners do not buy their 'Mechs. Yes, i am perhaps a bit strange. I said nothing against the Gold Khan 'Mechs but i do care for details like currency and team organization. I want my binary, i am sick of being part of a Star and having to play in a Lance :)

#22 Thorn Hallis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,902 posts
  • LocationUnited States of Paranoia

Posted 19 December 2013 - 06:47 AM

View PostMarack Drock, on 16 December 2013 - 09:01 PM, said:

Dude that's what I meant. If Zellbrigen didn't exist for the I.S. to use the Clans would have no honor and just wipe them out! Zellbrigen was a key element to win. If Clanners had no Zellbrigen then it would be cutthroat tactics. If the Clans had no Zellbrigen laws to follow and uphold then how could the I.S. possibly beat 20 Clans (As they would have then all attacked as no rules kept the others at bay)?


Well, if the Clans wouldn't have had honor as the basic principle of their society, they wouldn't have felt moraly superior to the IS citizens and therefor would have had no reason to invade in the first place.

#23 Pale Jackal

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 786 posts

Posted 19 December 2013 - 11:51 AM

A "duelling lock" would be so awesome.

However, I don't think it'd work with PUG matches, unless PGI wanted the matchmaker to pair up all Clanners versus all I.S. An excellent idea, but a lot of trouble, given that PGI seems to have plenty of problems on their plate already. Matchmaker is far from perfect as is.

#24 CyclonerM

    Tina's Warrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • 5,685 posts
  • LocationA 2nd Wolf Guards Grenadiers JumpShip

Posted 19 December 2013 - 12:18 PM

View PostPale Jackal, on 19 December 2013 - 11:51 AM, said:

A "duelling lock" would be so awesome.

However, I don't think it'd work with PUG matches, unless PGI wanted the matchmaker to pair up all Clanners versus all I.S. An excellent idea, but a lot of trouble, given that PGI seems to have plenty of problems on their plate already. Matchmaker is far from perfect as is.


I would love it for a special Clan vs Clan gamemode called "Trial of Possession" :ph34r:

#25 sj mausgmr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 234 posts

Posted 19 December 2013 - 02:16 PM

View PostCyclonerM, on 19 December 2013 - 05:27 AM, said:


I refuse to acknowdlege it. Probably they have still to design this part of CW. Clanners do not buy their 'Mechs. Yes, i am perhaps a bit strange. I said nothing against the Gold Khan 'Mechs but i do care for details like currency and team organization. I want my binary, i am sick of being part of a Star and having to play in a Lance :ph34r:


Refuse to acknowledge it as much as you like, but you've had your head in the dirt for the past two years if you expect anything else from PGI.

#26 CyclonerM

    Tina's Warrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • 5,685 posts
  • LocationA 2nd Wolf Guards Grenadiers JumpShip

Posted 19 December 2013 - 02:29 PM

View Postsj mausgmr, on 19 December 2013 - 02:16 PM, said:


Refuse to acknowledge it as much as you like, but you've had your head in the dirt for the past two years if you expect anything else from PGI.

Yes, i just refuse to acknowledge a certain truth :ph34r:





3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users