Ctf-3D Worth It?
#1
Posted 15 September 2013 - 02:15 AM
I like running the typical 3xUAC5 on my Ilya, but also love dual guass. Im thinking getting a jump jet fitted CTF will make dual guass much more fun..
Has anyone tried the CTF-3D and what do you think of it?
#2
Posted 15 September 2013 - 07:13 AM
For my personal experience I started with a 3D and did the dual ER PPC & Gauss thing and hated it. Then went to 260 Standard, PPC & AC/20. I liked it, but I found it never really worked properly. Then I went back to an XL280 with ER PPC & LB-10/X and had a lot of fun. Then I realized I could drop a heat sink, put Endo-Steel back in and came up with this build. Some times it works to devastating effect, other times it seems that the AC is pre-buff days and is doing no damage at all (I guess that happens when RNG hates me and I get no crits) and I'm enjoying it quite a bit.
For the other Phracts, I've tried the 4X which is a hell of a lot of fun, and the 2X. The 4X can do quad AC/2s, quad AC/4s, dual-Gauss, dual-LB-10/X. It's a little slow, but fun. The 2X I pulled a variant of my 3D build, dropping the jump jets, a ton of armour and a ton of LB-10/X ammo for 2 SRM4s and 2 tons of ammo.
Out of all of them I prefer the 3D, but I really like my Jump Jets.
#3
Posted 15 September 2013 - 07:21 AM
If your considering other variants the 1x has been my favorite as of now, 5mlas and an ac20, with a standard engine the thing is a monster, has my highest k/d ratio of my admitedlly small number of mechs.
I bought the ilya last friday myself, still havent decided if I really like it or not
hope this helps
#4
Posted 15 September 2013 - 07:29 AM
#5
Posted 15 September 2013 - 08:01 AM
#6
Posted 15 September 2013 - 10:16 AM
#7
Posted 15 September 2013 - 11:23 AM
#8
Posted 15 September 2013 - 09:09 PM
its a good flexible chassis, offering both ballistics and energy weapons with good hardpoint locations. its capable of taking a big engine for speed and has jump jet capability for added versitility. there are tons of loadout options, both the meta-approved and the home brewed that can be played effectively.
so yes, its a good mech and is well worth the very high C-bill price.
i personally haven't found a build that works for me, so it languishes in my mech bay waiting for me to finish mastering it, but it is a very solid chassis,
#9
Posted 16 September 2013 - 12:24 AM
Try this build: http://mwo.smurfy-ne...6cf9fbde78911a5
Works awesomely for me, extremely survivable, high damage, quick and nimble
#10
Posted 16 September 2013 - 05:28 AM
I usually ran mine with 2 ER PPC in the arms and 2 LL in the upper torso with 19 DHS, endo steel and a XL340.
max armour, but for 51 points in each leg.
Don't like JJ.
ERPPC's are in the arms to keep from fry frying myself with the heat, and to shoot down on people from the top of hills. LL are for close in welding, with the odd ERPPC blast if you can spare the heat, also to play peek a boo when they get into more effective weapons range.
You've got the speed to run down just about anything, and to pick your fighting range.
My rule is, if you get an XL engine, get the biggest one you can, otherwise you are just as slow and an easier kill.
Still like my muromets with the 3 AC2's. I love chewing apart people at over 1KM who are shooting at me with ineffective weapons at that range.
Edited by Skunk Wolf, 16 September 2013 - 05:35 AM.
#11
Posted 16 September 2013 - 06:08 AM
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...8041e77d52fb006
#12
Posted 16 September 2013 - 07:31 AM
Freelancer604, on 15 September 2013 - 02:15 AM, said:
I like running the typical 3xUAC5 on my Ilya, but also love dual guass. Im thinking getting a jump jet fitted CTF will make dual guass much more fun..
Has anyone tried the CTF-3D and what do you think of it?
Positively without doubt, the CTF-3D is a top tier 'mech. It's highly used in competitive play and it dominates in casual play as well. It is hands down the best Centurion, with only the Ilya getting close.
The 2x PPC 1x Gauss variant is far from dead, as well.
It's a brutal 'mech and really one of the "must own" 'mechs. Don't listen to anybody steering you towards the 4X in particular; it's an awful, awful variant that's too speed capped for it's own good, and is not heavy enough to make use of the extra ballistic over the Ilya.
Autobot9000, on 16 September 2013 - 06:08 AM, said:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...8041e77d52fb006
This build is worse than 3 UAC5 on an Ilya in every single possible way, unfortunately. That much ammo + XL ... yikes.
#13
Posted 16 September 2013 - 07:37 AM
(Well, except maybe the Ilya during the current UAC5 thumpathon.).
Edited by Appogee, 16 September 2013 - 07:39 AM.
#14
Posted 17 September 2013 - 10:29 AM
#15
Posted 17 September 2013 - 10:34 AM
#16
Posted 17 September 2013 - 12:40 PM
Freelancer604, on 15 September 2013 - 02:15 AM, said:
I like running the typical 3xUAC5 on my Ilya, but also love dual guass. Im thinking getting a jump jet fitted CTF will make dual guass much more fun..
Has anyone tried the CTF-3D and what do you think of it?
Short answer: Absolutely - you should doubt the credibility of anyone who tells you otherwise.
The reasons for this are twofold: First, the 3D has jump jets, which allows a flexibility which you can't get anywhere else on this chassis. Second, unlocking the Ilya's skill trees is very worthwhile, and the 3D is one of the most effective of the Cataphract variants.
#17
Posted 21 September 2013 - 01:59 PM
Victor Morson, on 16 September 2013 - 07:31 AM, said:
tehehe
Edited by wickwire, 21 September 2013 - 02:02 PM.
#18
Posted 23 September 2013 - 01:29 PM
Victor Morson, on 16 September 2013 - 07:31 AM, said:
I guarantee you an easy win over your Ilya. Maybe in the time, where Piranha had the U/AC broken with 15% chance to jam the triple U/ACs won, because U/AC was the only gun in the game and it didnt matter how much armor, just mattered who got more lcuk and who pulled the trigger first, but now never ever. XLs on Cataphract is also 100% fine, as much as ammo is. I thnk you dont know what youre talking about
Edited by Autobot9000, 23 September 2013 - 01:30 PM.
#19
Posted 23 September 2013 - 09:29 PM
#20
Posted 23 September 2013 - 10:06 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users