Egomane, on 01 January 2014 - 02:05 PM, said:
You are really good at semantics. I need to give you that! If your agenda wasn't so blatantly obvious you would make a pretty good politican.
No, I'd make a horrible politician. I tell people exactly the way it is.
Interestingly enough - that idea is becoming increasingly popular. After decades of political correctness and 'we can't have anyone be offended' laws that try to turn everyone and everything into a criminal - the idea that someone actually says what is on their mind and leaves the other to deal with it is becoming popular again.
That is all.
Quote
I'm not game for such petty things. If you want to twist words and truths, look for another victim. I'll not waste any more time with you.
There is just two little things I want to adress before I leave you alone in your world of selfrightousness:
You're discussing things further in a topic you have jettisoned. I would say you are for quite petty things.
You're just as vain as me - arguing with someone to have the last word. I do not claim any righteousness. I have principles that I stick to and vices I enjoy. One of them happens to be having the last word in an argument. I really - should - have taken the 'high road' long ago.
That's what separates you and me, Ego. I am fully aware of what I am doing and why I am doing it. I accept that I am choosing my actions - be they good actions, bad actions, or just actions. Beyond that - I know why I am choosing them.
You're still a man trying to control the trivial things. All you really need to learn to control is yourself. Even when I appear to not have control - it is because I have chosen, intentionally, to not implement control.
But, you're 50 years old, or whatever, and have the world by the ***. I'm not going to tell you anything.
Quote
You see, even in America that would be called slander, if you have no real evidence and base your accusations on hearsay. Just like it is in this case. You need to have realproof if you make such accusations.
That is incorrect. The burden of proof falls on the prosecution. For slander and libel charges to actually be heard in court - one must be able to present a case that measurable damage has been done.
Your case would, most likely, be thrown out and never heard. A judge would see it as a waste of their time.
Quote
Wouldn't be worth the effort!
Apparently you quoted the wrong thing.
Regardless - one must question why you would even bring it up if it weren't worth the effort.
It just reveals you as one ********** fighting another ********** for the honor of being the most douchetastic.