

Processor Amd Phenom Ii X6
#1
Posted 21 January 2014 - 12:07 PM
He has download and played, but it seems his video card sucks.... his birthday is coming up and I am considering surprising him with a new card, but I want to make sure, that his process will 1 be up to snuff for our game(mechwarrior)
His Computer is
Windows 7
Dell Computer
studio xps 7100
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T Processor 2.80
8GB Ram
64bit
1... Is his computer processor and etc..strong enough...
2. If it is, then what would be a good video card that wouldn't break my back but yet get him online for a great gaming experience with me...
Humbly,
Baron Cunedda Kell
#2
Posted 21 January 2014 - 12:24 PM
#3
Posted 21 January 2014 - 12:40 PM
#4
Posted 21 January 2014 - 12:52 PM
What you really want to do is have him install FRAPS, HWiNFO64, and GenericLogViewer, so he can make a few logs and look at them to see where the issues is.
I am shore there are a few tweaks taht will help some, but I don't know how much. Put all this in his user.cfg:
;thread stack ca_thread0Affinity = 0 ca_thread1Affinity = 3 r_WaterUpdateThread = 1 sys_main_CPU = 2 sys_physics_CPU = 5 sys_streaming_CPU = 4 sys_TaskThread0_CPU = 4 sys_TaskThread1_CPU = 1 sys_TaskThread2_CPU = 4 sys_TaskThread3_CPU = 0 sys_TaskThread4_CPU = 3 sys_TaskThread5_CPU = 2 ;-------------- d3d9_TripleBuffering = 1 sys_budget_sysmem = 4096 sys_budget_videomem = 2048 r_UsePOM = 0 r_vSync = 0 r_WaterCaustics = 0 r_WaterCausticsDeferred = 1 r_WaterGodRays = 0 r_WaterReflections = 0 r_WaterReflectionsMGPU = 2 r_WaterReflectionsQuality = 0 sys_budget_soundCPU = 5 r_ShadersAsyncMaxThreads = 5 e_AutoPrecacheCgfMaxTasks = 6 p_pool_size = 4096 sys_limit_phys_thread_count = 1 sys_physics = 1 sys_spec_Physics = 1 e_particles = 1 e_ParticlesCullAgainstViewFrustum = 1 e_ParticlesGI = 0 e_ParticlesPoolSize = 4096 e_ParticlesPreload = 1 r_UseGSParticles = 1
Because your guy is a hexacore, I can put out my "thread stack" for him to use; I tell everyone else to set it to all zeros, for lack of a better idea …
Taht "sys_budget_soundCPU" can be set lower, I think, if you have a sound card in the system, but I have no way to test it.
Be advised: You are now Officially a Swell Fella' for putting your money where your mouth is!

#5
Posted 21 January 2014 - 12:58 PM
I Play using a 560Ti 2GB and I think it would be a OK choice to start with, I would recommend you find a used one for ~$100-120 instead of spending $300+ for a New one though.
BTW, my CPU is a FX-4100 (4 Cores) OCed to 4.4GHz and I get a average FPS Moving around in a match in the 30-40 FPS Range with dips into the 20s during Heavy Combat before todays patch (Patched but haven't tried it yet), 60s in Pre/Post game menus and Front End.
Edited by Lord Letto, 21 January 2014 - 01:05 PM.
#6
Posted 21 January 2014 - 01:04 PM
#7
Posted 21 January 2014 - 01:35 PM
for a Brand new Video card between $100-150 From my own research, GTX 650Ti on the Nvidia side, on the ATI/AMD side, the R7 260X, overall though the R7 260X is a bit better then the 650TI.
According to Tom's Shared hardware Best Mid range Video card for January 2014 in the $120-200 Range is the 7790 for $130 and the R9 270 for $180: http://www.tomshardw...iew,3107-3.html
Edited by Lord Letto, 21 January 2014 - 01:57 PM.
#8
Posted 21 January 2014 - 02:06 PM
This is comparison between your friends PCU and the fastest PCU according to toms hardware 2013.
http://www.tomshardw...od%5B5796%5D=on
Bad news - the power supply in this Dell machine, how much watt can it deliver? Hopefully enogh for a new graphics card. How does one find this out, well it should say how much "wattage this" PSU is rated for somewhere on the psu itself, or in some manual for the dell machine, online, or in some documentation of your friends. Lets hope it is a 750 watt or 650 watt, then we are in the green.
There is also the slight issue of what powercables does this PSU in the machine have especially for a graphic card? Theese can sometimes have adapters that make them fit different fance new graphics power cables (6 or 8 or 6+6 or 6+8 or 8+8 iirc), but definately best is if theres already ready cables from the existing powersupply.
What graphics would I recommend? Well an AMD graphic card would maybe fit the system well. As I am not on the lookout for a card myself atm I dont exactly know what I would recommend, but a quick check, leads me to consider: maybe 7770?
http://www.tomshardw...eview,3107.html
Good luck and if you have further questions, I will try help.
#9
Posted 21 January 2014 - 02:11 PM
For reference found this page, about similar computer:
http://www.hardwareh...w-internal.html
Edited by panzerkunst99, 21 January 2014 - 02:15 PM.
#10
Posted 21 January 2014 - 02:19 PM
Baron Cunedda Kell, on 21 January 2014 - 01:04 PM, said:
I'll try to make it as simple as possible. As you stated, that you have no idea about computer talk in general I'll not tell you anything about overclocking, clock speeds or such. It will only confuse you.
The processor is fine as long as you do not expect top-grade performance.
A fitting graphicscard might an AMD HD7870 or AMD R9 270X or an Nvidia GTX 660ti or GTX 760. AMD and Nvidia are the producers of the graphicschip on those cards. These bring good performance for their cost and are enough to handle MWO and most other games well.
The PSU (power supply unit, mounted in the top and back of the case) in the Dell XPS should be (but I can not guarantee it) able to handle one of those cards.
Edited by Egomane, 21 January 2014 - 02:20 PM.
#11
Posted 21 January 2014 - 03:04 PM
125w processor, and up to about 150w (under heavy GPU load) on the 270x, leaving whatever is left over (depending on the efficiency of the psu) for everything else.
Edited by cSand, 21 January 2014 - 03:13 PM.
#12
Posted 21 January 2014 - 06:58 PM
#13
Posted 22 January 2014 - 07:00 AM
If you're going to do the upgrade, I would go ahead and just pick this up for him now before it goes off sale: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16817182199
That doesn't just have more wattage, it's actually a pretty darn decent 530W PSU.
Edited by Catamount, 22 January 2014 - 07:03 AM.
#14
Posted 22 January 2014 - 02:57 PM
panzerkunst99, on 21 January 2014 - 02:06 PM, said:
This is comparison between your friends PCU and the fastest PCU according to toms hardware 2013.
http://www.tomshardw...od%5B5796%5D=on
Good luck and if you have further questions, I will try help.
It is far from kick ***, it is quite mediocre, it’s actually a couple of generations old now as it was released in 2010, AMD's FX series are far superior being the current high end offering from AMD. Being one of the slower 6 cores from that range, in real terms, in a game such as MWO which will not make the most of it's two extra cores it will actually perform worse than the old Phenom II quad cores such as the 965 which had the same instruction set, only 4 cores but run at higher clocks.
Edited by Hexcaliber, 22 January 2014 - 03:02 PM.
#15
Posted 05 February 2014 - 03:03 PM

Is it any use to upgrade the existing processor? My opinion is no:
http://www.tomshardw...ock,3106-5.html
#16
Posted 05 February 2014 - 03:20 PM
Although I dunno about how much optimized MWO is yet, the CryEngine 3 supports up to 8 cores, so it will get the best out of these 6 (its 6x2,8Ghz).
And if you/ your friend like fiddling with CPUs a bit
-> there you go, thats why one buys AMD

I had exactly this processor and was running it at a stable 3,36Ghz (with turbo up to 3,96) for ~1,5 years without any issues.
edit: Of course its not the newest and fastest. It also has no fruit printed on it and doesnt come in shiny white. But as long as you dont wanna play in 4k on half a dozend screens... whats the thing?
edit2: Dont buy a "new" processor for an AM3 mainboard (if you can get a cheap AMD Phenom X4 955 somewhere, that would be a possibility, but I think they're out of production). The first step would be a newer AM3+ mainboard.
edit3: A Radeon R9 270X is also waaaaay to much money spend (considering we are only talking about MWO, and pretending money does matter^^). Friend of mine runs MWO (all settings on High (except Postprocessing=low)in 1920x1080. With a Radeon HD 6870... theyre out of production, but still on ebay etc. new in sealed box for ~60USD).
Edited by z00med, 05 February 2014 - 03:40 PM.
#17
Posted 09 February 2014 - 01:13 PM
I've been told by intel fans (I'm a bit of a computer hick myself, don't know that much) that it is the slow clock speed that games like MWO or MW:LL really have problems running smoothly. Dell BIOS won't allow overclocking in any way. Baron Kell and I are stuck at 2.8 Ghz.
So would a 6870 really be a noteworthy improvement over the 5870?
Wouldn't the R9 270X be better? Or again, are we just processor bottlenecked?
I find computers interesting and confusing at the same time! >.<
#18
Posted 09 February 2014 - 06:29 PM
Marauder3D, on 09 February 2014 - 01:13 PM, said:
Wouldn't the R9 270X be better? Or again, are we just processor bottlenecked?
Until you hear Tom's Hardware say you can get a good price on an ATI again, you avoid ATIs.
Odds are you have a processor bottleneck: It would be hard to do, but you would probably be better off getting an new motherboard and a big CPU cooler; I can't tell from here, but this probably would involve replacing your case and PSU, also. I know little about AMD, so I don't know if you could find a new mobo for that CPU …
Marauder3D, on 09 February 2014 - 01:13 PM, said:
More fun then you wanted to have!



1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users