Jump to content

Up To Date Low-End User.cfg


8 replies to this topic

#1 MechWarrior319348

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 997 posts
  • LocationInside a straightjacket

Posted 21 November 2014 - 01:12 PM

Could anyone help me out with this? I need a good user.cfg that can help me squeeze out a few more fps. I found a few user.cfgs that are ancient, with commands that dont work, or cause issues... but not a good modern performance one.

Thanks alot to anyone who can help!

#2 Quxudica

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Little Helper
  • 1,858 posts

Posted 21 November 2014 - 01:22 PM

View PostGigliowanananacom, on 21 November 2014 - 01:12 PM, said:

Could anyone help me out with this? I need a good user.cfg that can help me squeeze out a few more fps. I found a few user.cfgs that are ancient, with commands that dont work, or cause issues... but not a good modern performance one.

Thanks alot to anyone who can help!


I didn't think User.CFGs worked anymore, could have sworn pgi disabled them.

#3 Darian DelFord

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 3,342 posts
  • LocationFlorida

Posted 21 November 2014 - 01:23 PM

I am up for this as well.

View PostQuxudica, on 21 November 2014 - 01:22 PM, said:


I didn't think User.CFGs worked anymore, could have sworn pgi disabled them.


Nah they still work as far as I know.

#4 Felio

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 1,721 posts

Posted 21 November 2014 - 01:37 PM

We think they work, we just don't know which commands work, and PGI (so far) isn't telling.

#5 EoRaptor

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 37 posts

Posted 21 November 2014 - 01:48 PM

http://pastebin.com/wjxmK9tE

#6 MechWarrior319348

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 997 posts
  • LocationInside a straightjacket

Posted 21 November 2014 - 02:17 PM

View PostEoRaptor, on 21 November 2014 - 01:48 PM, said:


Thanks

#7 Ovion

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Vicious
  • The Vicious
  • 3,182 posts

Posted 21 November 2014 - 03:20 PM

To my knowledge, a lot of the stuff in there was reliant on a patch that no longer works.
(If I'm wrong, please let me know so I can include the stuff that works)

You can check out this thread for help though

#8 Felio

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 1,721 posts

Posted 21 November 2014 - 08:21 PM

View PostOvion, on 21 November 2014 - 03:20 PM, said:

To my knowledge, a lot of the stuff in there was reliant on a patch that no longer works.
(If I'm wrong, please let me know so I can include the stuff that works)

You can check out this thread for help though


How did you find out what works?

#9 Ovion

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Vicious
  • The Vicious
  • 3,182 posts

Posted 22 November 2014 - 03:17 AM

View PostFelio, on 21 November 2014 - 08:21 PM, said:

How did you find out what works?
Can't be sure on the last few items, but the FoV, Cockpit Glass, Depth of Field, Film Grain and SysFPS all definately work, as they have pretty obvious and noticable differences to being off.
The last 6, I can't confirm which might not, but I notice a performance boost with them in the user.cfg, compared to when they're not there so can only assume at least some of them work and make a difference.

But in that pastebin, a lot of it is from a thread originally some 2 years old, a lot of it only worked with the application of an external patch (which was stated to no longer work or be allowed in the last update(s) some 7-8 months ago), and much of it has been folded into other options files, or condensed down.
Certain things no longer work as they count as 'modifying for advantage' too.

I would be interested to find out what does and doesn't work from the old user.cfg to include it in my own help thread, and it may be something I persue at a later date.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users