

Jm6-A Or Jm6-S?
#1
Posted 26 February 2014 - 09:29 AM
I set it up like an old Rifleman, and I've loved it - I quickly reached the point where I needed to look at buying two more so that I could get my skill unlocks.
Next bought the -DD, because it's 6 hard points seemed like the most dakka variant. I know using all 6 is tricky, but it allows for the standard builds (2xGauss, 2xAC20, 4xAC5) as well as some nice mixed ballistic builds (3xAC2+UAC5, Gauss+AC/10+4MGs, 2xLBX+4MG). I'm currently running a Gauss+AC/10+2MG build while I get some C-bills for DHS.
But I've started to look ahead at what my third chassis will be, and I'm not really sure which way to go. It seems that anything the -S can do, the -DD can do better, but in the same sense anything the -A can do one of my Catapults can do better.
I don't know if I'm just not seeing the possibilities of the -A. If I'm going to get it I want to use those missile hard points. LRMs seem to be better served by a Catapult. SRMs or SSRMs have promise - but would really require a STD engine if I'm going to get in and brawl, and with the weight of that engine I can't seem to make it work.
Thoughts? Advice? Help?
Part of me is thinking that I should just grab the -S and go basic dakka (4xAC5 or 2xAC20), but I can't help but think that there's a good -A build out there. Here's the best -A build I've thought of yet. I'm not really sold on it though. http://mwo.smurfy-ne...6e31e0ccc235217
#2
Posted 26 February 2014 - 11:12 AM
That's a decent build you have for it. If SRM's work well for you, that build should work fine.
I admit to using the S and DD versions, but the A is a fine mech, though it is harder to find an easy, obvious build for it.
#3
Posted 26 February 2014 - 11:28 AM
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...bdc2de3258cb355
Give it a run, you can still brawl with the XL and pretty much need to for the SSRM's to be effective.
#4
Posted 26 February 2014 - 11:28 AM
#5
Posted 26 February 2014 - 11:35 AM
#6
Posted 26 February 2014 - 12:42 PM
Given that you already have the DD, I'd go with the A.
#7
Posted 26 February 2014 - 12:46 PM
Honestly, though, unless you WANT a 4th Jager just for setting up another similar, but slightly different loadout, there's nothing the S can do that the Firebrand (energy heavy) or DD (dakka heavy) can't do better. I'd suggest getting the A, since with it's unique and varied hardpoints you can run a WIDE array of builds, and figure out what you like. Some examples:
LRM-boat
SRM-boat
Streak-boat
2AC5/2PPC meta
"shotgun" (srms and LBX)
The JM6-A is the mech I recommend to a lot of new players...for the price of one 'mech you can get a feel for what a LOT of others feel like, even if some others have slightly better 'placement' of hardpoints. It's a damn fine mech.
Edited by Ghost Badger, 26 February 2014 - 12:46 PM.
#8
Posted 26 February 2014 - 01:42 PM
My Jagermechs are set up as follows:
S - 2x Gauss, 3x Medium Laser
DD - 1x LBX-10, 2x ER Large Laser, 5x Machine Gun
A - Mentioned above
I find each one fun to play and different in their own way!
#9
Posted 26 February 2014 - 05:25 PM
#10
Posted 26 February 2014 - 05:33 PM
I will link the exact build later (should I remember

I do remember the weaponry though:
2x AC/5
4 LRM/5 (two groups, one for chain-fire, one for group-fire)
2 ML
I rarely do less than 3-400 damage with it.

#11
Posted 26 February 2014 - 06:12 PM
I use 2 AC/5s, 4 SSRMs, and 2 MLs. The AC/5s are great at any range, the ssrms shoo away lights and finish off opponents missing armor, and the mls work when everything else is either destroyed or out of ammunition. It's a good support mech that can take care of itself.
I chose the -S over the -DD b/c I didn't see the point in having 6 ballistic hardpoints; 4 was plenty. I may buy a -DD soon.
#12
Posted 26 February 2014 - 06:56 PM

I've also been tempted to do a 2LBX+4MGs, but with two LBXs running more than that DHS upgrade, it's low on my shopping list.
Edit: because this looks like it could be fun: http://mwo.smurfy-ne...916621d080581a3 and I know, the ammo placement is bad. I just slapped it in there.
Edited by Buckminster, 26 February 2014 - 07:00 PM.
#13
Posted 26 February 2014 - 10:26 PM
That being said, a 6 machine gun DD with some heavy energy in the torso and a big engine make for a really fun destroyer of already damaged mechs.
I've yet to find a loadout that really works for me with the A, and maybe that's why i don't like it as much, but i've also spent more time with it than any other mech to try to find that loadout.
I tried the AC 40 with my S and it takes to many sacrifices and gets taken out way too fast. Here's my S as i run it and it does well:
JM6-S
#14
Posted 14 March 2014 - 03:44 AM
So what I ended up doing was basically turning it into a Catapult - twin ALRM15s, twin Streaks and twin large lasers. It's actually been reasonably effective. The large lasers and streaks are a fun touch - I've surprised a few lights that thought they could just come pick on the LRM boat.
#15
Posted 17 March 2014 - 03:55 PM
It's also great fun to hunt lights/mediums with, they usually see Jagers as easy targets (rightfully so), but with the STD engine and SSRM's, i can usually at least scare off a couple lights at a time if not destroy them outright.
#16
Posted 26 March 2014 - 08:24 AM
I called it Mammoth, because the twin barrels and misslelauncher somehow reminds me to the "Mammoth Tank" from C & C ^^
Edited by InkiePie, 26 March 2014 - 08:25 AM.
#17
Posted 26 March 2014 - 01:08 PM
#18
Posted 26 March 2014 - 01:35 PM
#19
Posted 26 March 2014 - 10:10 PM
But, my builds constantly change =P Maybe I'll jsut sextuple up some AC/2s on the DD

#20
Posted 27 March 2014 - 04:56 AM
Buckminster, on 26 March 2014 - 01:35 PM, said:
Honestly, the quad-jager isn't all it's cracked up to be. The quad Cataphract 4X is already pretty fragile and SLOW...with 5 extra tons to work with. The quad-AC5 Jager is pretty bare-bones. Take the DD and throw 3 AC5, 3 MG and 2 ML on it...THAT is a helluva build. The Jm6S has 4 energy and 4 ballistic...use those to your advantage
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users