Jump to content

What Do Duke Nukem And Mwo Have In Common?


37 replies to this topic

#21 Mister Blastman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 8,444 posts
  • LocationIn my Mech (Atlanta, GA)

Posted 27 February 2014 - 06:56 PM

View PostHeffay, on 27 February 2014 - 06:53 PM, said:


No. I only play good games.


Exactly. So my opinion of the netcode far supercedes your own.

#22 Heffay

    Rum Runner

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Referee
  • The Referee
  • 6,458 posts
  • LocationPHX

Posted 27 February 2014 - 07:00 PM

View PostMister Blastman, on 27 February 2014 - 06:56 PM, said:

Exactly. So my opinion of the netcode far supercedes your own.


How can my opinion supersede yours?

That's just weird man.

#23 Alaskan Nobody

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Determined
  • The Determined
  • 10,358 posts
  • LocationAlaska!

Posted 27 February 2014 - 07:07 PM

View PostMister Blastman, on 27 February 2014 - 06:28 PM, said:

Don't I have something better to do than troll?

FTFY

You know what they call someone with absolutely nothing positive to say in a forum?

Yes, we know the game is not all it could be (even Heffay knows that :lol:)
But neither is it anywhere near as bad as people keep trying to claim it is.


...Rather like LoZ: The Wind Waker.

#24 NautilusCommand

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 695 posts

Posted 27 February 2014 - 07:15 PM

Holy hell, might as well give second graders guns because everyone is shooting everyone.
OP, I'm not the biggest fan with PGI for the reasons being it takes up almost two years to release stuff. It takes them way too long to get things out the doors but that's because of their programer to artist ratio. This is being like 2+2=9, they really haven't had the time nor the budget to make something of worth. Waiting is the only way things will get better and if you are not going to wait then try being positive it gives them a reason to care if we care.
tl;dr chill out, all of you, and perhaps stop acting like children.

#25 Heffay

    Rum Runner

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Referee
  • The Referee
  • 6,458 posts
  • LocationPHX

Posted 27 February 2014 - 07:24 PM

View PostNautilusCommand, on 27 February 2014 - 07:15 PM, said:

stop acting like children.


NO U!!!

#26 DEN_Ninja

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Blade
  • The Blade
  • 1,097 posts
  • LocationCrossing, Draconis March

Posted 27 February 2014 - 07:25 PM

Logical Fallacies aside. Every dev studio makes good and bad games.

This is a given, new and old designers stepping in and out and different visions of a game appear. As far as I understand it DN was not a bad game but the hype and expectations killed it before the game even got off the ground. The material and content of the IP was already dated and so none of the gags an jokes didn't even invoke the nostalgia expected. Despite an obvious air of misogyny in gaming culture the game's 'funny' content was a turn off and didn't blanket the glaring sub par FPS gameplay. Not bad but not good.

PGI had a small hand in that game and it was not the dreaded shallow SP. Applying a relationship without a solid basis of proof.

Also. Diablo 3 still is bad. I have the CE edition and I can tell you right now that when it first came out that 50% of the content that would have been in it was ripped out. You could see clear signs of possible alternate levels and the coming expansions of crafting that will come with Reaper of Souls. There were unused doodads of a caravan obviously meant for the enchanting of items AT LAUNCH. It is only NOW that it is being put in.

There are worse companies and developers than PGI. Clearly no here has played Command and Conquer 4 Tiberium Twilight. A game so bad it nearly killed off the fanbase. It only was made worse by the addition of a browser game that had no balance and was shallow.

Or we could bring up games like Spore or Firefall. Games that fell short because content was cut or removed. The focus of the games then shifted elsewhere when the designers would start leaving the studio because they saw their dream game being ripped into pieces.

PGI has stated over and over what game they wanted. The process has been slow but so far has hit most marks. They are well on their way to making the game they want and have not cut entire swathes of content just for some $60 single release profit. I have placed faith on PGI to make this game better than it is now. It shakes and quivers but I've never been so disappointed by them as I have been by other studios.

I will never play Spore
I will never play Diablo 3 again
I will never play Elder Scrolls Online again
I will never play Firefall again
I abstain from any Call of Duty game since MW2
I abstain from any Battlefield game since BC2

Oh and Heroes of Might of Magic went down the drain too.

Edited by Tichorius Davion, 27 February 2014 - 07:31 PM.


#27 King Arthur IV

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • 2,549 posts

Posted 28 February 2014 - 07:11 AM

they take 10 years to make? i thought that was going to be the answer.

#28 Cactus In The Rear

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ankle Biter
  • The Ankle Biter
  • 1,003 posts
  • LocationIn the South Wall Cornerclub,Balmora.

Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:18 AM

Every time someone goes on QQing about the game my only thought is that even if the game wasn't all that great...

Posted Image



If you dont like it then don't play it,I however like and will continue to play and support this game.


And by the way Command and Conquer 4 was really bad and even required an active internet connection to use.

Edited by Xanilos, 12 March 2014 - 01:27 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users