Just Say No!
#1
Posted 12 February 2014 - 12:34 PM
#2
Posted 12 February 2014 - 01:05 PM
#3
Posted 20 February 2014 - 09:22 AM
#5
Posted 20 February 2014 - 10:34 AM
Edited by Nathan K, 20 February 2014 - 11:42 AM.
#6
Posted 20 February 2014 - 03:27 PM
Marack Drock, on 20 February 2014 - 09:34 AM, said:
I like XL's too, it's just it seems the heavier the mech the less effective the XL. My stalker use to have XL, i ditched it for a huge standard and double heat sinks. Turns out, he now has more firepower with better heat efficiency because of switching to a standard. Anyhow, I'm interested to see how the Direwolf will perform with an XL, especially since it originally mounted a Starfire 300 XL (of course thinking......what clan mech didn't mount an XL?)
#7
Posted 20 February 2014 - 06:17 PM
Stingray1234, on 20 February 2014 - 03:27 PM, said:
#8
Posted 20 February 2014 - 06:53 PM
#9
Posted 25 February 2014 - 09:18 AM
#10
Posted 25 February 2014 - 09:43 AM
#11
Posted 25 February 2014 - 10:21 AM
With the current state of the mech lab I cant even think of trying to change anything on any of my builds.
#12
Posted 25 February 2014 - 10:49 AM
That being said most Assault and Heavy class Mechs seem to last a lot longer and there by doing more damage with a standard engine. They can fit larger guns (AC/20) or more LRMS in the case of the Atlas if you don't have an XL taking up space.
It has been mentioned in other forums (sorry I can't find the link) that the clan Mech will have to lose both side torsos, center torso, or both legs to be put down. Your clan Mechs will do just fine in MWO if that is the case.
With all this in mind if you are killing the guys in red and having a blast mount what you want and PEW PEW on.
#13
Posted 25 February 2014 - 01:02 PM
desan476, on 25 February 2014 - 09:18 AM, said:
that's a good way of putting it
#14
Posted 25 February 2014 - 03:10 PM
EVA1313, on 25 February 2014 - 10:49 AM, said:
A does not alway = B in this equation.
An example, is the Victor. You put a Standard 320 in, you have something like this VTR-9S
Now with an XL, you can have that same firepower, but be noticeably faster and cooler
VTR-9S
both of which enhance survivability, and by running cooler, you DPS,
or
VTR-9S
still be faster, but have better firepower, alpha, cooling and DPS.
on one you have a sustained 4.61 DPS, the other 6.44. That is 276.6 damage per minute vs 386.4 per minute. If mech b survives 5 minutes, that is 1932 (potential damage) you need an additional 2 minutes to do the same damage in mech A, assuming you have your full firepower the whole time.
Mind you, this is theory crat, and limited at that, but it is just to point out that lasting longer is no indication of actually doing more damage in this scenario. A zombie centurion left with just 2 Medium lasers for 13 minutes of the match is seldom going to do as much useful damage as one that lasts half the match but can pack an AC20 on top. Because you need damage front loaded in the match to be of most benefit to the team.
Edited by Bishop Steiner, 25 February 2014 - 03:16 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users