Amsro, on 09 March 2014 - 09:07 PM, said:
Uh, what? I don't hit the dirt, but then I don't shoot at it either. It has lots of armor, I don't see how another heavy mech should have drastically different armor if any different.
As far as "viable" is concerned. Who decided this list? Viable for what?
My 4X will mop up a Jagermech or most any mech in no time. Only an amazing solo pilot or great enemy team work will stop me. You can't even run 4 AC/5 effectively on a Jagermech, not enough tonnage for engine/ammo.
Yeah deadly
I've never had any DC tell me or anyone else to run a cat 4x in comp play but the 3d of course cause it has JJs now with the meta changing a bit with the rework of JJs who knows how well jump sniping will be. That's what I mean by viable, will u see it on a top level match and the answer is no u won't c it. And u know what I mean by shooting the dirt, the cats arms r low so u need to expose your hole body to shoot and with the jagger u only need to expose about 20 to 30% to fire the balistics. And BTW 2 uacs and 2 ac2 s is the best load out on a 4x.and what I mean by the armor is every 5 ton increase on a chassis has 4 more armor points max on the side torso except the 70 chassis for some reason look it up I was pissed when I found this out it don't make any sence. So going from 65 to 70 no side torso increase :/
Edited by hercules1981, 09 March 2014 - 09:34 PM.





















