3
The "powder Keg" Banshee Build
Started by ColonelMetus, Mar 16 2014 08:29 PM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 16 March 2014 - 08:29 PM
howdy partener, here is a banshee that i designed to go up like the 4th of july if it gets an ammo explosion
but if it doesnt, looks like good dps
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...616f0591f7eb825
but if it doesnt, looks like good dps
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...616f0591f7eb825
#2
Posted 16 March 2014 - 08:45 PM
jeez i already thought my 275 ammo for my 3 acc5 jag was already overkill :s
but it feels so great to shoot for so long
dont shoot the medium lasers at same time!
heres the two ac 2 2 ac 5 version with more heat and slow
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...342115e5e5f37e3
but it feels so great to shoot for so long
dont shoot the medium lasers at same time!
heres the two ac 2 2 ac 5 version with more heat and slow
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...342115e5e5f37e3
#3
Posted 17 March 2014 - 01:16 AM
That build done right: BNC-3E
You had way to much ammo, and sad little secondary weapons.
3ac5's in the above build can fire continuously and still shed heat. Gets you about 3 volleys of PPC fire in with them while you close.
You don't need more ammo unless you're a painfully bad shot.
You had way to much ammo, and sad little secondary weapons.
3ac5's in the above build can fire continuously and still shed heat. Gets you about 3 volleys of PPC fire in with them while you close.
You don't need more ammo unless you're a painfully bad shot.
#4
Posted 17 March 2014 - 01:22 AM
Just one question: Why in the world would you strip armor off the torso with the ammo?
I mean, surely you'd knock some off the dead arm first.
I mean, surely you'd knock some off the dead arm first.
#5
Posted 17 March 2014 - 04:07 AM
Because he wants that comedic effect of a jenner getting confused when a small laser explodes all the ammo.
#6
Posted 17 March 2014 - 06:49 AM
i stripped no armor from my mech because he who strips armor for more firepower, soon finds himself with neither!
gimme da loot gimme da loot (im a bad boy)
gimme da loot gimme da loot (im a bad boy)
#8
Posted 17 March 2014 - 08:58 AM
Wintersdark, on 17 March 2014 - 01:16 AM, said:
That build done right: BNC-3E
You had way to much ammo, and sad little secondary weapons.
3ac5's in the above build can fire continuously and still shed heat. Gets you about 3 volleys of PPC fire in with them while you close.
You don't need more ammo unless you're a painfully bad shot.
You had way to much ammo, and sad little secondary weapons.
3ac5's in the above build can fire continuously and still shed heat. Gets you about 3 volleys of PPC fire in with them while you close.
You don't need more ammo unless you're a painfully bad shot.
No he doesnt have too much ammo. 4 tons ammo per AC5 is about right if your firing from range and still want enough for the end game.
#9
Posted 17 March 2014 - 11:04 AM
Ammo Destroyed
Edited by Amsro, 17 March 2014 - 12:05 PM.
#10
Posted 17 March 2014 - 01:09 PM
DONTOR, on 17 March 2014 - 08:58 AM, said:
No he doesnt have too much ammo. 4 tons ammo per AC5 is about right if your firing from range and still want enough for the end game.
My build adds a pair of PC's. With a 35 point strike, I should be killing or disabling in just a couple hits... And I do.
Firing from range is no reason to miss. Firing from extremely long range where your weapons do very little damage is a waste of tonnage.
Too much ammo is a severe disadvantage. It makes your Mech more vulnerable, and it represents opportunity loss - in his case, punishing extra weapons he could have to push his burst damage up, extra cooling. All so he can fire a whole lot totally uselessly? That's just foolish.
I get that I run less ammo than most (and yet do extremely well and don't run out of ammo) but if you're burning much more, it's because you're doing something wrong(firinf outside of useful range, or simply missing way too often) and that build choice is definitely hurting you.
#11
Posted 17 March 2014 - 01:30 PM
Wintersdark - I think you are missing the extremely important "fun" value of just going "DAKKA DAKKA DAKKA DAKKA" for the entire match in the enemies general direction.
Efficient? No.
Effective? No.
Badass? Totally
Efficient? No.
Effective? No.
Badass? Totally
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users