Jump to content

Where Are We At.

General

310 replies to this topic

#81 BLOOD WOLF

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6,368 posts
  • Locationnowhere

Posted 18 April 2014 - 10:53 AM

View PostCCC Dober, on 18 April 2014 - 10:52 AM, said:

4 Pillars were promised, two of which "appear" to be functional

+ Mech Warfare
+ Information Warfare

but we are still missing

- Role Warfare
- Community Warfare

So I guess that 50% sums it up.

keep in mind information warefare can be different things. it entails, knowing the postion of enemy mechs and their movement. Also entails the the situation of the battle and the options that can be taken. I am sure there are other's.

#82 AlmightyAeng

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,905 posts

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:02 AM

View PostBLOOD WOLF, on 18 April 2014 - 10:47 AM, said:

What would a screen prove?, I have those somewhere on the clan wolf forums, and only the best games were recorded. Not every match, just the ones that the lance excelled. Im sure you dont always get damage in every match; Not only that but would you get that damage on a 1v1. You might have pummeled a mech that was focused on another mech. Screens dont show the whole situation. Just be ready to hear from me when PM's get here at the end of the month. In short they dont tell me if you took the mech down by yourself.


"Screenshots of your kills, assists and damage prove nothing! I'm awesome and will beat you!" Yeah sure, whatever.

Hope you've got your premium time ready to burn at the end of the month, because you won't have the ability to 1v1 without it.

View PostBLOOD WOLF, on 18 April 2014 - 10:53 AM, said:

keep in mind information warefare can be different things. it entails, knowing the postion of enemy mechs and their movement. Also entails the the situation of the battle and the options that can be taken. I am sure there are other's.


Hey Bloodwolf, didn't your OP say you weren't looking for a discussion or commentary on what people said? Now you feel the need to pick apart people's thoughts?

Edited by Ghost Badger, 18 April 2014 - 11:03 AM.


#83 BLOOD WOLF

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6,368 posts
  • Locationnowhere

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:06 AM

View PostMycrus, on 18 April 2014 - 03:34 AM, said:


why are you talking in 3rd person?

you remind me of remus...



just curious since i saw this. How was i talking in third person?. Respect the OP, VS, BloodWolf says respect the OP. Do you see the differnce?
I didnt really put a person prespective on it. Unless sayinng Respect the OP as treating the OP as a person, i dunno. help me out

View PostGhost Badger, on 18 April 2014 - 11:02 AM, said:


"Screenshots of your kills, assists and damage prove nothing! I'm awesome and will beat you!" Yeah sure, whatever.

Hope you've got your premium time ready to burn at the end of the month, because you won't have the ability to 1v1 without it.



Hey Bloodwolf, didn't your OP say you weren't looking for a discussion or commentary on what people said? Now you feel the need to pick apart people's thoughts?

i tried that, but the advice i was given was to let the thread flow, and just remind people to stay on topic; However i dont think that is possilbe. Also what is wrong with picking peoples thoughts?

Not possible until i write the outline but it will be soo many pages in, and people might just not even go back to the OP. I will, but it will take me some time, i got alot of writing i have to do already. This thread already is not how i visioned it to be. That cannot be helped i guess.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 18 April 2014 - 11:09 AM.


#84 AlmightyAeng

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,905 posts

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:09 AM

View PostBLOOD WOLF, on 18 April 2014 - 11:06 AM, said:

just curious since i saw this. How was i talking in third person?. Respect the OP, VS, BloodWolf says respect the OP. Do you see the differnce?
I didnt really put a person prespective on it. Unless sayinng Respect the OP as treating the OP as a person, i dunno. help me out


i tried that, but the advice i was given was to let the thread flow, and just remind people to stay on topic; However i dont think that is possilbe. Also what is wrong with picking peoples thoughts?

Not possible until i write the outline but it will be soo many pages in, and people might just not even go back to the OP. I will, but it will take me some time, i got alot of writing i have to do already.


Have fun writing. The point I was making is that the image you've presented is mildly hypocritical. "Post in my format!" They do. You delete the thread. "Post in my format! No Conversations!" Starts conversation to discuss why he thinks a post is wrong.

#85 BLOOD WOLF

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6,368 posts
  • Locationnowhere

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:16 AM

View PostGhost Badger, on 18 April 2014 - 11:09 AM, said:


Have fun writing. The point I was making is that the image you've presented is mildly hypocritical. "Post in my format!" They do. You delete the thread. "Post in my format! No Conversations!" Starts conversation to discuss why he thinks a post is wrong.

I wanted this whole thread just be filled with paragrahs of constructive writing. Starting from the beginning and thoughts to an end on their experiance througout the whole game. since day 1 till now.. I didnt want causual conversation becuase we have plenty of that in other threads. I just wanted a thread where some can come to read Well structered written paraphraphs. I dont know why your twisting it making it seem as if i was doing something wrong. All i did was set a guidline and kindly asked they follow that and anything else in between was their words, their thoughts, their experiences. Exept they will be well written in paraghraphs and organized. without the back and forth of a regualar thread. I wasnt telling anybody what to write, then they would all be the same. I know some share similar thoughts and feelings but we are all our own individual. Guess it was too much to hope for.

"the point I was making is that the image you've presented is mildly hypocritical. "Post in my format!" They do. You delete the thread."

How was i being hypocritical?

"As a matter of fact Create a summary. Give valid points and cover everything. Start from point A,B,C,D and dont miss anything. Respect my wishes and dont turn this into a medium to cuase a stir. I would encourage you not to respond to any post. These are to be player summaries of their Whole state of the game. I now know you all have a lot to share. Respect the post and if you dont wish then dont answer. Remember, no rush; Take your time and write it out clearly. Thank you."-- Take that and show me where i was being hypocritical(behaving in a way that suggests one has higher standards or more noble beliefs than is the case)

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 18 April 2014 - 11:24 AM.


#86 AlmightyAeng

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,905 posts

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:18 AM

I'm not twisting anything. I'm stating what you did.

You asked for people's opinions with little discourse. A large number of people did. Some chose not to, and discussed, and a few trolled you.

Instead of reading and cherrypicking the responses and using them like you said you planned on doing, you deleted the entire thread and posted a new one, huffing about "following the rules" this time.

That's an incredibly immature reaction. And people have responded poorly accordingly.

#87 BLOOD WOLF

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6,368 posts
  • Locationnowhere

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:25 AM

View PostBLOOD WOLF, on 17 April 2014 - 03:37 PM, said:

. As a matter of fact Create a summary. Give valid points and cover everything. Start from point A,B,C,D and dont miss anything. Respect my wishes and dont turn this into a medium to cuase a stir. I would encourage you not to respond to any post. These are to be player summaries of their Whole state of the game. I now know you all have a lot to share. Respect the post and if you dont wish then dont answer. Remember, no rush; Take your time and write it out clearly. Thank you.

Please, i dont want what became of it the last time, the first step is to read, the second is to evulate, and the third is to write.


Go ahead, tell me what i asked for without qoating me.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 18 April 2014 - 11:29 AM.


#88 AlmightyAeng

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,905 posts

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:27 AM

View PostBLOOD WOLF, on 18 April 2014 - 11:25 AM, said:

Please, i dont want what became of it the last time, the first step is to read, the second is to evulate, and the third is to write.


The fourth should be to consider using spellcheck.

#89 BLOOD WOLF

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6,368 posts
  • Locationnowhere

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:30 AM

View PostGhost Badger, on 18 April 2014 - 11:27 AM, said:


The fourth should be to consider using spellcheck.

i spelled evaluate wrong.

"first step is to read, the second is to evulate, and the third is to write."--I guess that's a little much to ask for some poeple. At least for you.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 18 April 2014 - 11:34 AM.


#90 BLOOD WOLF

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6,368 posts
  • Locationnowhere

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:39 AM

View PostGhost Badger, on 18 April 2014 - 11:18 AM, said:

I'm not twisting anything. I'm stating what you did.

You asked for people's opinions with little discourse. A large number of people did. Some chose not to, and discussed, and a few trolled you.

Instead of reading and cherrypicking the responses and using them like you said you planned on doing, you deleted the entire thread and posted a new one, huffing about "following the rules" this time.

That's an incredibly immature reaction. And people have responded poorly accordingly.

Based on that you didnt even read what i wrote. You said i asked for opinions, and that is the half of it. I wanted more than opinons but of course you didnt read it, so how would you know.

#91 AlmightyAeng

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,905 posts

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:40 AM

Step one: Read

Well, I read the OP...so that counts.

Step two: Evaluate

Hmm...from his lack of spelling and attention to grammar, coupled with the fact that this is the SECOND thread he's tried to grab specific answers in....my evaluation of the OP is quite low. Check.

Step three: Write

Called out the OP for being a hypocrite. Check. Wrote about my opinions on the game. Check. Decided to continue to tell the OP why people aren't appreciating his thread "properly." Troll OP for posting erratically in amusing non-sequiturs and straw men. Check.

Any more steps? I'm having fun so far.

Edited by Ghost Badger, 18 April 2014 - 11:41 AM.


#92 BLOOD WOLF

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6,368 posts
  • Locationnowhere

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:44 AM

View PostGhost Badger, on 18 April 2014 - 11:40 AM, said:

Step one: Read

Well, I read the OP...so that counts.

Step two: Evaluate

Hmm...from his lack of spelling and attention to grammar, coupled with the fact that this is the SECOND thread he's tried to grab specific answers in....my evaluation of the OP is quite low. Check.

Step three: Write

Called out the OP for being a hypocrite. Check. Wrote about my opinions on the game. Check. Decided to continue to tell the OP why people aren't appreciating his thread "properly." Troll OP for posting erratically in amusing non-sequiturs and straw men. Check.

Any more steps? I'm having fun so far.

what i cant understand is you seem to delight in being rude. So i will respond in kind,.

And you didnt read the OP. Go ahead, qoute the OP and break it down and show me how it was being hypocritical. Low comprehension skills man, really you do yourself an injustice.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 18 April 2014 - 11:45 AM.


#93 Amsro

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 3,441 posts
  • LocationCharging my Gauss Rifle

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:46 AM

View PostBLOOD WOLF, on 18 April 2014 - 10:47 AM, said:

What would a screen prove?


That you can be the best mech in the ENTIRE match. 24 Man solaris. I win. ! :unsure:

Posted Image

#94 AlmightyAeng

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,905 posts

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:47 AM

View PostBLOOD WOLF, on 18 April 2014 - 11:16 AM, said:

"As a matter of fact Create a summary. Give valid points and cover everything. Start from point A,B,C,D and dont miss anything. Respect my wishes and dont turn this into a medium to cuase a stir. I would encourage you not to respond to any post. These are to be player summaries of their Whole state of the game. I now know you all have a lot to share. Respect the post and if you dont wish then dont answer. Remember, no rush; Take your time and write it out clearly. Thank you."--

Take that and show me where i was being hypocritical(behaving in a way that suggests one has higher standards or more noble beliefs than is the case)


Sure thing. Next time you Google a word, make sure you look at the related words, too. Hypocritical. Hypocrite. Hypocrisy.

When you claim to want people's opinions, and then they GIVE them to you, and then you decide to delete the entire thread and start over because you didn't like the way people were posting...guess what, that makes you a hypocrite.

hy·poc·ri·sy

hiˈpäkrisē/

noun


  • 1.
    the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.

Edited by Ghost Badger, 18 April 2014 - 11:47 AM.


#95 BLOOD WOLF

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6,368 posts
  • Locationnowhere

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:48 AM

View PostAmsro, on 18 April 2014 - 11:46 AM, said:

That you can be the best mech in the ENTIRE match. 24 Man solaris. I win. ! :unsure:

Posted Image

altough i cant deduct from teamwork and it is important. So yea that was a good job but i will still issue a challenge and spend my own premium time.

#96 AlmightyAeng

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,905 posts

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:52 AM

View PostBLOOD WOLF, on 18 April 2014 - 11:48 AM, said:

altough i cant deduct from teamwork and it is important. So yea that was a good job but i will still issue a challenge and spend my own premium time.


Isn't reading comprehension something you were ragging on me for? Look again, it's photoshopped.

23 kills? Yeah, he did a "real good job" ... in photoshop. Lol. +1 Amsro, you got BLOODWOLF!

#97 BLOOD WOLF

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6,368 posts
  • Locationnowhere

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:53 AM

View PostGhost Badger, on 18 April 2014 - 11:47 AM, said:


Sure thing. Next time you Google a word, make sure you look at the related words, too. Hypocritical. Hypocrite. Hypocrisy.

When you claim to want people's opinions, and then they GIVE them to you, and then you decide to delete the entire thread and start over because you didn't like the way people were posting...guess what, that makes you a hypocrite.

hy·poc·ri·sy

hiˈpäkrisē/

noun



  • 1.
    the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.


you qouted me and gave me a definition of being hypocritcal but you didnt break down what i said and explain how i was being hypocritical. you try so hard, i cant take points from that.

#98 Tynan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Bludgeon
  • The Bludgeon
  • 277 posts

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:53 AM

View PostAmsro, on 18 April 2014 - 11:46 AM, said:

That you can be the best mech in the ENTIRE match. 24 Man solaris. I win. ! :unsure:

Posted Image

I'm not going to accuse you of photoshopping, but I am going to note that in a screenshot of a match with all enemies dead the top bar says Victory - Gathered Maximum Resources.

#99 BLOOD WOLF

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6,368 posts
  • Locationnowhere

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:54 AM

View PostGhost Badger, on 18 April 2014 - 11:52 AM, said:


Isn't reading comprehension something you were ragging on me for? Look again, it's photoshopped.

23 kills? Yeah, he did a "real good job" ... in photoshop. Lol. +1 Amsro, you got BLOODWOLF!

I domt care whether it was photshoped or it was real, its not gonna help him 1v1 against me.

#100 AlmightyAeng

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,905 posts

Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:54 AM

View PostBLOOD WOLF, on 18 April 2014 - 11:53 AM, said:


you qouted me and gave me a definition of being hypocritcal but you didnt break down what i said and explain how i was being hypocritical. you try so hard, i cant take points from that.


Sigh. I can lead a wolf to posts, but I can't make it think. I'm done.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users