data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8b54/d8b54e7a47cf52481bc45d3566c7b0ade78ceb21" alt=""
#1
Posted 17 April 2014 - 03:37 PM
Please, i dont want what became of it the last time, the first step is to read, the second is to evulate, and the third is to write.
#2
Posted 17 April 2014 - 04:16 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4f17/c4f1710c38992216f48406f56cc70d738c4fe4b7" alt="Posted Image"
#3
Posted 17 April 2014 - 04:23 PM
#4
Posted 17 April 2014 - 04:29 PM
Hellcat420, on 17 April 2014 - 04:23 PM, said:
why cant we be Respectful, How hard is it to expect adualts to read the OP, then decide whether or not to comply or not. You did tell me so but does that mean i have to give up?. Does it mean its to hard to ask? or are we a bunch of 10 year olds( once again i dont mean to be disrespecful but sometimes i wonder). Anyway no matter how long it takes this thread will hopefully shape to what the OP is asking.
Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 17 April 2014 - 04:34 PM.
#5
Posted 17 April 2014 - 04:36 PM
BLOOD WOLF, on 17 April 2014 - 04:29 PM, said:
dude are you new to the internet? almost everysingle person on the internet reverts to a 10year old as soon as they load up their webbrowser. and why do you refer to yourself in the 3rd person? you can try all you want, just dont get mad and waste your time restarting your thread, that will hurt your cause more than it will help.
#6
Posted 17 April 2014 - 04:43 PM
Hellcat420, on 17 April 2014 - 04:36 PM, said:
It wont hurt my cuase. I used 10 year olds becuase my little brother cant give me what i ask, but i had hoped that people older than him can. If reseting the thread offends you i am sorry but i will do so for as long as it takes.
Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 17 April 2014 - 04:45 PM.
#7
Posted 17 April 2014 - 04:48 PM
BLOOD WOLF, on 17 April 2014 - 04:43 PM, said:
it does not offend me, but it will discourage people who would/already did follow your criteria from reposting. do you really think they are gonna type out a long essay for you, then retype it every time you restart the thread? you got to take the good with the bad if you want to get anything from this thread.
#8
Posted 17 April 2014 - 04:56 PM
My prediction of the future. There will be more hero and champion mech variants, they will then go on sale for 30%, then 50%, just to strangle every penny they can from them. Then the clans will be released, and there will be hero clan mechs, then 30% off, then 50%.... By then there won't be enough people playing this game to even fill out a few teams in a night. But PGI won't care, they will have made bank.
#9
Posted 17 April 2014 - 05:36 PM
I come back to find this new thread with the same first post? What a crock of shit.
Did you ASK them to delete the first thread because you didn't get the results you wanted, BLOODWOLF, or did PGI do that all by themselves?
Pathetic. Just because people don't want to falsely gush over this game doesn't make it disrespectful. You want honesty? Then you take the answers you get. Please find mine, AGAIN, below.
------------------------
The game looks okay (it looked better two years ago before they reduced graphics quality for low-end machines).
The weapons aren't totally unbalanced, but SRM hit detection is still bad and pulse lasers still don't have a good reason to be taken 95% of the time.
In equally skilled hands, heavy and assault mechs will still dominate mediums and lights. Implemented quirks for mechs to differentiate them are so slight as to be almost non-existent.
Community warfare and any overarching meta are still vaporware after two years. At the end of the month they're giving league play SOME functionality if people want to create their own via third party...so that's something.
2 years ago you were able to drop with whatever friend you had online. Now it's 1-4 or 12. They might re-open 'anysize' group queues in the future, but are very vague and I'm not holding my breath.
Overall, I'm disappointed that they didn't make the game what they could have. The gameplay itself is enjoyable, but it's mindless arena matches with no real purpose. I wish they hadn't delayed that purpose for 2 years...it was what sold the Founder, their initial monetary base, on the game.
Edited by Ghost Badger, 17 April 2014 - 05:43 PM.
#10
Posted 17 April 2014 - 05:38 PM
Ghost Badger, on 17 April 2014 - 05:36 PM, said:
I come back to find this new thread with the same first post? What a crock of shit.
Did you ASK them to delete the first thread because you didn't get the results you wanted, BLOODWOLF, or did PGI do that all by themselves?
Pathetic.
He did it, because people weren't providing him with the dissertations that he was requiring for his thread. I don't think this one is going to go his way either
#11
Posted 17 April 2014 - 05:58 PM
Ghost Badger, on 17 April 2014 - 05:36 PM, said:
I come back to find this new thread with the same first post? What a crock of shit.
Did you ASK them to delete the first thread because you didn't get the results you wanted, BLOODWOLF, or did PGI do that all by themselves?
Pathetic. Just because people don't want to falsely gush over this game doesn't make it disrespectful. You want honesty? Then you take the answers you get. Please find mine, AGAIN, below.
------------------------
The game looks okay (it looked better two years ago before they reduced graphics quality for low-end machines).
The weapons aren't totally unbalanced, but SRM hit detection is still bad and pulse lasers still don't have a good reason to be taken 95% of the time.
In equally skilled hands, heavy and assault mechs will still dominate mediums and lights. Implemented quirks for mechs to differentiate them are so slight as to be almost non-existent.
Community warfare and any overarching meta are still vaporware after two years. At the end of the month they're giving league play SOME functionality if people want to create their own via third party...so that's something.
2 years ago you were able to drop with whatever friend you had online. Now it's 1-4 or 12. They might re-open 'anysize' group queues in the future, but are very vague and I'm not holding my breath.
Overall, I'm disappointed that they didn't make the game what they could have. The gameplay itself is enjoyable, but it's mindless arena matches with no real purpose. I wish they hadn't delayed that purpose for 2 years...it was what sold the Founder, their initial monetary base, on the game.
why are you insulting me? what kind of person are you? i ask in respect and all i get from you is attacks on my character?. I deleted the post not PGI, what do they have to do with this?
Once again maybe in less than an hour im going to delete again and restart, i will restart untill people can meet the Criteria that i have set. This isnt anything negative, im not looking to boilster anything, prove this or that, no arguments, none of that. I just want well thought and well written paragraphs. I might not save everybodys so feel free to come back and rewrite.
the reasons are irrelevant; I did start this thread and the Topic is clear. So respect what i ask, If you cant then...well i dont know what draws your fingers to the key board after you read but whatever it is dont.
Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 17 April 2014 - 06:00 PM.
#12
Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:00 PM
Roadbeer, on 17 April 2014 - 05:38 PM, said:
Well, I have been known to give a sermon or two, and write encyclopedias.
BUT
Many people had already spent considerable time doing just that the first time. And others, who had little to add, simply chimed in on points we agreed with, or commented on things we didn't agree with. Which is how ANY Thread works. Not everyone will write a doctoral thesis, no matter what, and in fact, it becomes counterproductive to do so, as people's eyes glass over and cogent points are lost due to information and repetition overload.
Then to see the lengthy, well thought out commentary of several people jettisoned without so much as a "by your leave"? Why would anyone WANT to give the OP what he desires, when in a moment he could just decide to wipe it out again? Did he even PM people to provide a chance for them to save their work?
Sorry OP; but your handling of this is not going to inspire many to provide what you desire.
Edited by Bishop Steiner, 17 April 2014 - 06:03 PM.
#13
Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:01 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 17 April 2014 - 06:00 PM, said:
BUT
Many people had already spent considerable time doing just that the first time. And others, who had little to add, simply chimed in on points we agreed with, or commented on things we didn't agree with. Which is how ANY Thread works. Not everyone will write a doctoral thesis, no matter what, and in fact, it becomes counterproductive to do so, as people's eyes glass over and cogent points are lost due to information and repetition overload.
Then to see the lengthy, well thought out commentary of several people jettisoned without so much as a "by your leave"? Why would anyone WANT to give the OP what he desires, when in a moment he could just decide to wipe it out again? Did he even PM people to provide a chance for them to save their work?
Sorry OP; but your handling of this is not going to inspire any to provide what you desire.
TL;DR
#14
Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:03 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86391/8639152a6bac33e393deb5ceb234c106101709cb" alt="Posted Image"
#15
Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:08 PM
Tekadept, on 17 April 2014 - 06:03 PM, said:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86391/8639152a6bac33e393deb5ceb234c106101709cb" alt="Posted Image"
Based on that, what have i done not to deserve it. In relation to this thread i have not done any harm and i have conducted myself in a manner worthy of response. As a matter of fact ghost badger went as far as to throw an insult as which someone else has done previously in the old topic(deleted).
I want to add, its not the words you use, it is how you use them. If i use the word Moronic, or stupid, i mean only in the definition sense. You can be wise but still say something stupid; You can still act moronic. attach feelings if you want but remember i say everything in an objective sense.
Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 17 April 2014 - 06:22 PM.
#16
Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:10 PM
#17
Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:10 PM
#18
Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:13 PM
Besides that, my opinion of the game since I have been here is:
It's had it's good times. It's had it's bad times. Some patches have caused drastic changes (and sub-sequential spontaneous mech combustion (see references to the "real" LRMagadons)), and others have barely touched a thing.
The mechs get ever better, and I feel that the art team is ever trying to improve on their game (take it in all terms). The new meshes, even if not always perfect, are very nice.
Weapon balance I feel is in a good place currently, but there is always things to tweak and try to make better. I may sometimes disagree with a change (such as the reduced AC2 range currently), but overall I feel a lot of good has been happening here as of late.
Is the game perfect? No. No game ever well be. However, I do think that PGI has been making great strives now on the game, and improving their communication efforts. I support PGI so far, despite their many flaws. They are a company run by humans, and humans make mistakes.
#19
Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:15 PM
BlackBeltJones, on 17 April 2014 - 06:10 PM, said:
there are other people in the world who live by such arbitrary and self centered guidelines.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb4c1/cb4c19564f6557410192eb06d412282a22a5b145" alt="Posted Image"
comes to mind.
Telling people to respect you, then executing (well, executing their comments, don't wanna go too overboard here, lol) those who don't respect you in the way YOU think you should be respected, doesn't tend to engender future respect. Sorta makes a person come across as a bully.
I don't think that is the intent of the OP, but perception is reality, especially on the Internet. And when you post on an OPEN FORUM, you will have to deal with the other kids not playing the way you want them to in the sandbox. But thing is, it's not, actually your sandbox. So that leaves you with two options. Respect that others will play in the sandbox, and not always according to the rules you want. Or take your ball and go home.
(PS...yeah, I mighta went with the nuclear option here... but ya know, I'm a Steiner. Go big, or go home, ya know?)
Edited by Bishop Steiner, 17 April 2014 - 06:20 PM.
#20
Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:22 PM
BLOOD WOLF, on 17 April 2014 - 06:08 PM, said:
Based on that, what have i done not to deserve it. In relation to this thread i have not done any harm and i have conducted myself in a manner worthy of response. As a matter of fact ghost badger went as far as to throw an insult as which someone else has done previously in the old topic(deleted).
ok man you really need to understand something. the internet is the largest bridge that has been built in human history. not only that, but it looks identical to the bridge that trolls dream of when they dream of troll heaven. do you really think restarting your thread is going to make people stop trolling you and do what you demand?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users