Do the old veterans have a chance agains young powergamers?
#81
Posted 20 June 2012 - 08:42 AM
Granted, this is battlefield, not mechwarrior, but it shows that vets can be as much dangerous as a young player
#82
Posted 20 June 2012 - 08:42 AM
This isn't the average shooter, a lot of people will have a hard time adjusting.
#83
Posted 20 June 2012 - 08:48 AM
Felix Davion, on 20 June 2012 - 06:47 AM, said:
I pay EVE as well, and can echo this. I also travel the U.S. playing scenario paintball. That's my FPS. In both, you have to find out what you are good at through trial an error, what you find enjoyable, and stick with it. Same goes for MWO. The great part about the game is it's diverse enough to accommodate different play styles.
#84
Posted 20 June 2012 - 09:06 AM
Also at the same time being closer to having to wear "adult diapers" in such close contact situation may help with some of the immersive aspects of today's improved gameplay.
Plus as you get older and things start to drop off or need replacing the use of prosthetic limbs allow us to have a better understanding of the underlying form with mechs.
Been a fan of Battletech since I was 12 and that was around 30 years ago, so Mechs have been in the blood all along its evolutionary path in PC games. As such having Mech Iron in the blood allows us to interface better with neurohelmets.
Sure you young "whipper snappers" will give us a run for our money.
#85
Posted 20 June 2012 - 09:13 AM
Mad Pig, on 20 June 2012 - 05:57 AM, said:
How about one with a birthdate of 1948!
That's me Punk!
Yes, my reactions are a tad slower than someone who is 1/3rd my age. But I have team-mates who will more than make up for my shortcomings.
So, come on! Try and spank me silly.
Edited by Wingit, 20 June 2012 - 09:21 AM.
#87
Posted 20 June 2012 - 09:19 AM
#88
Posted 20 June 2012 - 09:54 AM
It is a sweeping generalisation,of course, but for certain when I started playing Counterstrike (when it first came out, I have been computer gaming for over 20 years now) I was far better than I am now with reactions, but it balances out because now I'm far more patient and less prone to rage quitting and charging. I'm better at team play than I was 15 - 25 years ago for certain. Easy examples.
So overall. no one generation will be "better" in my opinion, but you may see a trend of being better at certain aspects of the game. Overall it will balance out.
Young guns with not so much disposable income will be more likely to free to play and grind up, old farts like me will probably pay and have premium this and that so we don't have to play 12 hours a day and still progress.
#89
Posted 20 June 2012 - 10:05 AM
#90
Posted 20 June 2012 - 10:09 AM
#91
Posted 20 June 2012 - 10:16 AM
#92
Posted 20 June 2012 - 10:16 AM
Fortunately this game isn't CoD, with insta-spawns etc. In this game, "Old and Sneaky" has a chance.
#93
Posted 20 June 2012 - 10:16 AM
Older people usually are more patient and have learned more strategy/skill.
I've seen a lot of younger players power through a game then quit it immediately. (Recent example D3)
Some younger people will show skill some wont. We will see out on the field.
#94
Posted 20 June 2012 - 10:33 AM
#95
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:04 PM
#96
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:12 PM
Wingit, on 20 June 2012 - 09:13 AM, said:
How about one with a birthdate of 1948!
That's me Punk!
Yes, my reactions are a tad slower than someone who is 1/3rd my age. But I have team-mates who will more than make up for my shortcomings.
So, come on! Try and spank me silly.
You misunderstood and I wasn't clear - I'm referring the 20 somethings and younger being spanked. Us old farts got the paddles ready.
#97
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:28 PM
My tabletop gaming experience was alongside my experience with computers and most of my gaming friends (some have passed - R.I.P) were both tabletop mini, RPG, and computer gamers back in the 80s. As for my computers over the years starting with access to my high schools TRS-80s circa 1981 I've been building my own IBM compatible systems since the intel 486 CPU was top of the heap in the early 1990s.
As a younger someone pointed out to me recently I'm of that generation who is old enough to remember the early days of home computing but young enough to feel completely at home at a PC keyboard - as though it's second nature. And I know as a fact that there are many of us older and wiser who seem to have grown up on the leading edge .
Edited by Wo0m3rA, 20 June 2012 - 12:39 PM.
#98
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:36 PM
CapperDeluxe, on 20 June 2012 - 05:29 AM, said:
How might one know the age of their commander? Unless they willingly (like me) impart you with said information you can't know.
As a 20 year old who intends to specialize in the command role I find the notion that age is directly related to player skill, and knowledge of tactics, to be absurd. I was in a small but successful EVE Online corporation, with members ranging in age from 15-30, that was led by an 18 year old. I personally have had experience not only with chess and real time strategy games, but studying the use of tactics throughout history simply because it interests me.
A good order is a good order, no matter the age of the commander.
I look forward to leading many of you to victory, or following your orders as a scout when the role has already been filled. I'm flexible like that
Shr1mp, on 20 June 2012 - 10:05 AM, said:
It will be a pleasure to fight alongside you Shr1mp! I hope more players from both ends of the age spectrum share your view.
Edited by xSidewinder, 20 June 2012 - 12:43 PM.
#99
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:52 PM
#100
Posted 20 June 2012 - 01:00 PM
Edited by ArchSight, 20 June 2012 - 01:01 PM.
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users