376 replies to this topic

[Nothing Whatsoever]

Nice.

Just want to say thank you for this.

I Know it couldn't have been easy listening to the criticism on the new art, but as others have mentioned in the past, since the IS logos remained classic then so too should the Clan logos be classic.

So, really thank you!

[AgroAlba]

I think the old icons are pretty bad. The new ones are a vast improvement.

[Kaio-Kerensky x10]

It's doomed, but I really do like the new logos better.

[Zerberus]

Not a very easy choice, but I gotta go with the slightly modified classic logos. They fit in better with the IS ones, and more importantly they have a certain "aura" that IMO the new ones don`t quite capture... And haviong a more classic version also helpes to keep this a BT game (in a flair sense), instead of just becoming another "trendy" Mech of Duty.

The new ones seem, how can I saythis , "overproduced"? In the sense that I feel that they`re mostly too intricate to be something that would be put on a vehicle of war, especially a clan machine which generally aren`t known for their gaudiness and bling.

And while I feel that the spheroids, mercs and LWs should have some say in the matter as they`ll be looking at them, too, I don`t personally feel that their votes should be counted 1:1 to those of the clanners that will be the ones wearing them. But OTOH, some of the LWs are simply "unaffiliated" clanners due to their clan not being in the game yet.. so I gues it`s ok either way

Though Unlike many others, I also prefer the old CSJ and CJF logos, evven though I do find the new ones a tad nicer aesthetically. BUT:

CSJ: Are you a black panther, or a SMOKE Jaguar? Then why in hell would you want your logo to be a black panther?



CJF: Are you a JADE (green) falcon, or a yellow to neon green hawk? Then why would you want a yellow to neon green hawk as your logo?


That`s where those 2 redesigns dropped the ball, IMO

Edited by Zerberus, 10 June 2014 - 11:49 AM.

[Rammjager]

Traditional

[meteorol]

Old smoke jaguar looks like a pokemon drawn by a 5 year old kid.

[Zeleglok]

Classic is better , except the Jaguar logo. Imho.

[CoffiNail]

TheMagician, on 10 June 2014 - 11:22 AM, said:

Wolf has always had 6 stars.

Ahh, you are right with that. So odd that it does, as 5 makes more sense Lore wise

[Falcrist]

I like the traditional a bit more

[CoffiNail]

Saber Avalon, on 10 June 2014 - 11:28 AM, said:

Actually the Clan Wolf logo has 6 stars. 5 for the pentagon worlds and 1 to represent Kerensky. Know your lore, Oathmaster.

Never read that before. Thanks for the info.

[Pariah Devalis]

Damn the traditional ones are gorgeous!

[3rdworld]

Both look fine.

[Lostdragon]

This was a really difficult choice. In the end, I've been a huge fan of CGB since MW2: Ghost Bear's Legacy, and I think the Classic design looks better than the Modern one for CGB so I voted based on that. I like the modern designs of the other logos though.

[Will9761]

Well done on the faction logos, I'm voting for the classics. The only gripe is that the Wolf bar should be larger but other than that, I love the classic remakes.

Edited by Will9761, 10 June 2014 - 11:37 AM.

[WX_Straunos_Leroux]

Where are all the people who were complaining about the new junk? My head will probably explode if we get almost exactly what we were asking for but a bunch of knuckleheads vote through the crappy "modern" ones.

[Demoncard]

AgroAntirrhopus, on 10 June 2014 - 11:29 AM, said:

I think the old icons are pretty bad. The new ones are a vast improvement.

Zharot, on 10 June 2014 - 11:29 AM, said:

It's doomed, but I really do like the new logos better.

This could get confusing really quickly.

Old could mean the newer classic version, or it could mean the ones that were designed before, and new vice versa.

Edited by Demoncard, 10 June 2014 - 11:40 AM.

[Kibble]

I like the redesigned classic logos. Yeah they might be a bit off but honestly you all are just nitpicking now. You won't notice the little things o the logos while in game. It's just to damn small to notice.

Pgi will not take your feedback on these. It's as what was said one or the other. No more time shall be used to alter what is being presented.

[Rubidiy]

Ghost Bear and Wolf are surely better in their Classic variant. There was no need in remaking them. New ones look cheesy and childish.
Problem is, that JF and SJ were bad and still are bad. Luckily I'm not interested.
Classic Bear is not Classic, but it clearly shows how logos can be redesigned without making them look stupid and cartoonish. Great job on Ghost Bear! Although initial canon design was totally a good one.

[Mordin Ashe]

The new ones. The old ones aren't bad but honestly, that green bird from CJF looks like a parrot and CSJ kitten looks more like some pokemon than a dangerous beast. Plus I can't help but see it as smiling instead of growling... A hard choice either way.

[WarHippy]

There is no choice, there is only classic.