253 replies to this topic

[Rebas Kradd]

Quote

[color=#959595]autoload for their arty strikes... *facepalm*

[/color]

[color=#959595]This is an overstated problem. If a player is serious about arty strikes, you can be sure that they don't miss a match without manually reloading.[/color]

[Reno Blade]

All the points of the 2nd poll are good, but I left 5 unchecked to give a sense of priorities.
Why can we vote for all of them anyway?
Would prefere if there were only 50% votes available, so people would have to prioritize.

[BLOOD WOLF]

I am sure these are going to be all in the works. It is very nice seeing this list.

[Dragonslayerclan]

Can you add something so we can change the colors of our HUD. I'm color blind and can not tell the changes on the clan HUD when it goes from damage to critical.

[BrotherSurplice]

How about "all of the above would be great and why aren't they in the game already?".

[Sandpit]

Bryan Ekman, on 19 June 2014 - 08:22 AM, said:

Exactly. We're not ignoring the big feature requests like Collisions and CW. These are fixes/additions that can be handled in at 2-4 week dev cycle. This is the first of many polls to come as we address the communities wishes.

but this won't take any resources from things like cw right? it's not going to slow down the development cycle of CW at all. That's what I was wondering. I understand that it can be done in a 2-4 week cycle but what I'm asking is are these features going to require resources that would otherwise be used in speeding up things like CW?

[TheBlackMegadeus]

why not all?

[Joe Decker]

Yep, dear PGI - all of that would be nice Features. Please bring them all ! It was really hard for me to pick only two of all those Options...

[Varent]

Nicholas Carlyle, on 18 June 2014 - 01:01 PM, said:

Way too much fluff.

How about a proper in game chat system? So I don't die telling someone they are NARC'd.

How about you finish UI2.0, fix the mech lab and add the social features you said you were working on?

All of the stuff in your poll should take a month max if you have decent programmers. So I refuse to vote.

Oh yeah... New maps. Every month. Like you said you would... Half a freaking year later.

Why is this not upvoted more? Where is Community warfare and community warfare updates

[Rebas Kradd]

Varent, on 20 June 2014 - 06:23 PM, said:

Why is this not upvoted more? Where is Community warfare and community warfare updates

Because the OP and five other people keep repeating that this poll is for things that are not already in the pipeline. CW is in the pipeline already. Ergo, it's not needed for the poll.

[Sandpit]

Varent, on 20 June 2014 - 06:23 PM, said:

Why is this not upvoted more? Where is Community warfare and community warfare updates

They were "temporarily" put on the backburner for clan mechs (for 2 years apparently)

[Rebas Kradd]

Sandpit, on 20 June 2014 - 08:20 PM, said:

They were "temporarily" put on the backburner for clan mechs (for 2 years apparently)

...and UI2.0...and hitreg problems...and 12v12...and DX11...and major gamebreaking bugs...

[RapidFire7]

I vote everything that is listed for both

[gilliam]

The option to choose HTAL or paper doll would be great, but what would be even more awesome as an option would be to do it like MW:LL where you have the paper doll with the HTAL graph below it.

[slasher923]

It may be just me but i don't understand the reason for wanting an in game VOIP. I get that it will make it easier for people who solo drop to communicate, but there are plenty of communities that allow people to use there servers (ngng comes to mind), All i really see from an in game system is just another way for people to troll and berate people they see as inferior players. Just my two cents.

[MonkeyCheese]

For me ams toggle is a must, especially for my locusts and commandos as sneaking is hard to do with ams going off and I would rather take it than go without also wasting precious ams ammo for other players on a 20-25ton Mech isn't a good thing.

Ams should be on a 3 option toggle. Defend yourself, defend the team and completely off.

then hard point sizes, UAV restock and map zooming.

Edited by MonkeyCheese, 21 June 2014 - 02:16 PM.

[Barakus]

Why can't we have all of these? They are all good ideas.

[IronChef]

My vote, for Track iR users, allow the HUD to be fixed to the cockpit. When you move your head, monitors, reticle....everything in the HUD stays in place while your view point moves around. It is visually difficult to use Track iR without setting a huge deadzone in the Track iR user interface. Otherwise you spend a lot of time trying to keep your head straight so your view doesn't look all funky (reticle slightly off-center).

Currently, the only thing that doesn't move during head movement is the aiming reticle (circle/crosshair). A big deadzone forces the user to make an exaggerated movement to the left or right to look out the side windows, as applicable. This keeps the reticle centered in the viewscreen while fighting, and lets you look left and right only when you snap your head left and right.

[Chaosity]

Nicholas Carlyle, on 18 June 2014 - 01:01 PM, said:

How about a proper in game chat system? So I don't die telling someone they are NARC'd.

Better yet, it seems ridiculous that we would not know if a transmitter were attached to our mech so we should have some indicator that TELLS US IF WE ARE NARCed.

[MrGutz]

I would like to see destroyed mech explosion. big ones that do damage to things that are to close. As well as interactive environments. ie. exploding trucks or gas depots. LOL I guess I like big bangs. lol The ability to buy air craft and tanks would be fun. voice head sets so teams can talk to other team mates. oh and some Omni mechs.