Why the heck are ties STILL worse for exp than a loss? you get 100 exp on a loss and 0 for a tie... Idk how the cbills work but logicallly the exp for a loss should be at least 200 exp. Personally I think something as close as a tie should just give winning exp for both teams since it means everyone played a pretty good game. The cbill salvage bonus should also get split between teams. Then again PGI and logic don't tend to go together....
0
1 reply to this topic
#2
-
-
- The Resolute
- 2,019 posts
Member
- Google+: Link
- LocationVancouver, BC
Posted 07 July 2014 - 11:39 AM
A Tie/Draw is objectively worse than a loss. You still get the ******** 25k CBill payout, but that is all and the loss of all XP reward is ridiculous. We accept that people 'might' farm it, but giving 100xp same as a loss does not seem terrible and avoids the issue of forcing people to play to lose.
RAM
ELH
RAM
ELH
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
