Wintersdark, on 13 July 2014 - 12:57 PM, said:
The C1 is just as good as the C4, really - at that point, you're running a pair of ALRM15's, generally speaking.
It's absolutely not the most versatile missile platform. It perhaps should be, but isn't.
Penta = 5. That's the number of LRM10s you need to continously use them in chain fire without waiting for cycling at any point, which is why I was referring to missile spam with the first 2. Chain fired LRMs are in a lot of cases much more potent than singular salvos and you can still fire all of them at once with both the C4 and the A1 without suffering critical heat.
C1 can run 2xLRM20 while the C4 can use 4xLRM10. In that scenario, the C4 is more ammo efficient and cycles faster but suffers from having only 2 energy hardpoints in the CT, one of those being almost a madatory TAG, while the C1 has 2 additional Energy hardpoints in the STs, so it also has the option to go for 2xLRM15 and then carry 2 LLas for more direct fire capabilities. Basically, the C4 is the better choice if you want to be very missile-centric, but the C1 is more balanced and offers direct fire options.