Jump to content

Good Thunderbolt Builds


16 replies to this topic

#1 TheRealTommo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 145 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 04 August 2014 - 03:26 AM

Hi guys (& girls).

I'm after some tips on a decent TDR-5S build?

Thanks.

#2 Escef

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 8,530 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationNew England

Posted 04 August 2014 - 03:42 AM

http://mwo.smurfy-ne...04ad7c13fcb7ec7

Runs a little warm at times, and the ammo count is a tad low. But despite these drawbacks, it tends to perform. Stay with the pack and be ranged support as long as you can. Those 3 MLs can be deadly, but if you use them too much with the Large or ACs you're asking for problems. As a bonus, the lack of an XL engine makes it very tanky and cheap to put together.

#3 FireKiller87

    Member

  • Pip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 16 posts

Posted 04 August 2014 - 07:29 PM

This is the build my Thunderbolt 5S currently uses:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...5e9607b3ab2b6a6
Runs moderately cool, good survivability with the STD, and has a nice shield arm to torsotwist with. It has something for all ranges. Can switch a MLas for a TAG, drop AC and the other MLas for an ERLL/ERPPC and Artemis.

Alternatively, this:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...49fa6eadaedd8b5
Runs cooler than the above, similar survivability, slightly more armor on that shield arm, and in exchange for smaller death clouds it gains a higher-damage AC.

#4 tm10067

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 945 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:13 AM

LRM close supporter - you just go with your assaults and bang enemies from clear sight about 300-400 meters, also engaging in close combat with mpl+mg if needed. Long range is not recommended due to limited lrm ammo. If halved you're still functional either as lrm boat or close combat.
TDR-5S

#5 Modo44

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 3,559 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:20 AM

If you twist correctly, the mech can tank a lot of damage thanks to its big arms. That is its one and only strength (other 65-tonners win on the firepower front by being XL safer and having very high mounted hardpoints). So, take STD250 through 300, make one side light on weapons, use the dual AMS or the jumping variant. Unlike other heavies, you sometimes want to draw fire on purpose.

Edited by Modo44, 05 August 2014 - 12:22 AM.


#6 Cptn Goodvibes Pig of Steel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 125 posts
  • LocationBrisbane, Australia

Posted 05 August 2014 - 03:19 AM

Here's the build that I use for my Thunderbolt 5S. It essentially uses the same components as stock, though you need to put in double heat sinks and go ferro structure for space and tonnage. Then add extra LRM's, AMS, missile ammo and the odd heat sink. Haven't gone with Artemis or use a TAG, but it can carry a 900 load and fire 25 missiles in a single impact salvo. Short range melee weapons are minimally reduced and not compromised by running an XL engine for these encounters. The LRM's are place fairly high in the right torso, which does facilitate firing solutions from hull down positions.

General battle routine is to use up the LRM's before engaging in combat at shorter ranges. Setup one mouse button for the LRM's and another for the remaining weapons. Seems to go okay for minimal outlay and a natural build for this chassis. Here's a link:

http://mwo.smurfy-ne...f624e4d0b6bc52f

Goodluck

#7 Tiamat of the Sea

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Guardian
  • Guardian
  • 1,326 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:53 PM

I do kind of the opposite from everyone else with my TDR-5S From The Blue.

I've found that the first two energy hardpoints in the left torso are almost perfectly vertically aligned with the cockpit- which means that the dual PPC mount is amazing for shooting through narrow holes in the same way that the TDR-9S right torso energy mounts are amazing for shooting over hills. Combining the two PPCs with an LB-X lets you critstomp anything that has under 20 armor left when you unison fire that side of the 'mech.

Theoretically, dropping the autocannon would allow use of a standard engine, with which you could put a close-range weapon on the right arm (Large Pulse maybe?) and then go left-side-longrange-peeking right-side-closeup-brawling, using corners and twisting to tank maximum damage.

#8 TheRealTommo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 145 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 10 August 2014 - 02:34 AM

Thanks for the help ;)

#9 Koniks

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • Moderate Giver
  • 1,301 posts

Posted 10 August 2014 - 08:57 PM

XL300 builds--I wouldn't take an XL in the TDR unless I planned to go 80KPH+:
2xAC5 (5t ammo), 3xML, 1xLPL, 2xDHS.
1xAC10 (3t ammo), 3xMPL, 1xLPL, 5xDHs.
2xMG, (1t ammo), 2xLPL, 2xLL, 7xDHS.
2xPPC, 1xAC10, ammo and DHS to taste.

You can tweak all of them to run with a STD engine. Your best bet is going to be a 250, 260, 275, or 300.

e.g. STD275, 1xPPC, 3xML, 1xAC10, 3 tons of ammo, 2xDHS.

#10 IllCaesar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 980 posts

Posted 11 August 2014 - 12:07 PM

Here's mine.

http://i1058.photobu...zps4f7e6f5b.png

To lay all my cards out on the table, I'll preface the build with this - I'm not very good at this game. I think, at best, I'm a decent player - I check my corners, watch my heat, hit most of the time, but a veteran will just be able to 1v1 me more often than not. My skills, or lackthereof, are why there is what a lot of people would consider a low amount of ammo - because I rarely run out before becoming heavily damaged. It obviously has a strong emphasis on close-quarters combat, and the only real long-range weapon is the UAC5, with its limited ammo pool. Designed that way because I suck at the game and prefer CQB. The lack of leg armour isn't actually much of an issue, since not many people aim for the legs of T-Bolts anymore, especially not one pounding them in the face. If you want more armour on them, just take off one heatsink or the ML in the arm. I switch between chain-firing the ML, usually chain-firing for larger opponents because is tends to get them to back off - important because this build can do a lot of damage, but it can't hold its own against most Assaults. I usually stick close to at least one or two other mechs, because once an opponent notices a UAC5 jam, they tend to rush in with alpha strikes.

If I can reliably get over 200 damage with this, with my subpar abilities, it probably has something to offer to somebody looking to fill this role.

#11 Budor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,565 posts

Posted 11 August 2014 - 01:33 PM

View PostEscef, on 04 August 2014 - 03:42 AM, said:

http://mwo.smurfy-ne...04ad7c13fcb7ec7

Runs a little warm at times, and the ammo count is a tad low. But despite these drawbacks, it tends to perform. Stay with the pack and be ranged support as long as you can. Those 3 MLs can be deadly, but if you use them too much with the Large or ACs you're asking for problems. As a bonus, the lack of an XL engine makes it very tanky and cheap to put together.


I have sold all TBs cause i thought they were terrible but this looks really neat esp. since its not one of those slow ass builds and still not xl'd.

Will rebuy thatone when "clan vs is" is a thing, ty.

#12 Throbbinwood

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 111 posts

Posted 11 August 2014 - 04:54 PM

I run 2x LPL, 2x ASRM6 & 2 MG's. STD engine at 77kph. ENDO and FF.

#13 waterfowl

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 207 posts

Posted 12 August 2014 - 10:19 PM

Here's what my 5S has been for months:

3 ML
1 LB10X
1AC/2
1 LL
STD 250

I've had some incredible games with it, but it's a bit clunky to drive.

Strategy, no missiles makes your silly right torso less of a "SHOOT ME" target. I have an AMS on it now too. 150 shots of AC/2, 45 shots of 10X. With 10X on an arm you can snap shot pretty damn well, as well as pot shot with the AC/2. Just be careful not to lose the arm before you use all the ammo. Thanks to the offset cockpit, you can hump a corner pretty easily.

My problems with the chassis are machine guns blow on it because it's too sluggish to turn to apply them, and the missiles basically ruin your right torso ... so that's what I hoped to fix with this build


Edited by waterfowl, 12 August 2014 - 10:24 PM.


#14 The Schwartz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 126 posts

Posted 12 August 2014 - 10:44 PM

http://mwo.smurfy-ne...c4b7bd0f1a7e71b
This is my favorite Thundarbolt loadout. It just does a suprizing amount of consistant damage. I built it as a cheapy and just left it that way.

#15 Kitane

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 1,009 posts
  • LocationPrague, Czech Republic

Posted 14 August 2014 - 04:29 AM

I've just recently grinded elite proficiencies on my Thunderbolts, and it was difficult, to say the least. Maybe they were ok before Clans, but now they are just very, very, very bad. Clan mechs just sneeze in your direction and one side torso is gone. It can take a lot of punishment, but tbh, tanking that damage seems to be its only redeeming feature. Clan weapons with their sustained dps have absolutely no problems shredding components on a big, fat, juicy Thunderbolt and the mech can't bring enough firepower with STD engine to be competitive.

It's easy to hit, easy to disarm, it's one of the worst mech in the game for XL engines and it has pretty weird hardpoints. It can use asymetrical builds with one side as a shield side, but side torsos are soo massive that a smarter enemy will easily take out the more important side. The mech is too fat for arms to provide a decent protection.

TDR-5S was a biggest pain. It is the only TDR with 20 tube launcher, so it isn't bad for LRMs. One of fairly well performing builds I've tried was a Thunderpult with LRM20+LRM10, XL280 engine, 3 MPLAS and Tag.

TDR-5SS has two shoulder mounted energy hardpoints that are begging for 2 (ER) LL or 2 PPCs and make him one of best hill humping mechs in the game.

TDR-5SE...The build that "clicked" for me was a slightly fatter jumping Hunchback with 2 ASRM6, 5 MLAS and STD300 engine. Simple, straightforward, fairly effective.

I am not sure what to do with Thunderbolts, even after nearly 150 matches. I've went through at least ~20 different builds with them, but it was just a long chain of failures with very few exceptions that were passable.

#16 Netzilla

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 42 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationSt. Louis, MO

Posted 14 August 2014 - 10:26 AM

I've been having fun with these two builds:

TDR-5S
The 3ML + LPL have similar range so they complement each other well and the LRMs help during those long-range sniper fests that happen so often. Can run a bit hot but but that's when I lay off the LPL until I can cool down a little. Left arm is used purely as a shield.

TDR-5SS
The high mount points on the right shoulder are perfect for peaking over hills to snipe with the PPCs. In close, the MPLs easily cover the PPCs' minimum range and are well suited to brawling. Both arms are used as shields for this one.

#17 JC Daxion

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 5,230 posts

Posted 14 August 2014 - 03:28 PM

View Posttm10067, on 05 August 2014 - 12:13 AM, said:

LRM close supporter - you just go with your assaults and bang enemies from clear sight about 300-400 meters, also engaging in close combat with mpl+mg if needed. Long range is not recommended due to limited lrm ammo. If halved you're still functional either as lrm boat or close combat.
TDR-5S



That is almost what i run, but instead of the STD, i run a Big XL, with a tiny bit less ammo





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users