Hero Mech Hellslinger
#81
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:20 PM
#83
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:23 PM
Mitsuragi, on 05 August 2014 - 12:20 PM, said:
Also I love how the big banner picture on the front page slide show has it flipped so they're on the left side to de-emphasize how crappy it looks (the top of the upper launchers are obscured at the top of the page).
Again love the paint job, just that model issue irks me a lot.
Edited by CapperDeluxe, 05 August 2014 - 12:24 PM.
#85
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:29 PM
Or at least a Spider hero
#86
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:31 PM
#87
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:40 PM
DONTOR, on 05 August 2014 - 12:24 PM, said:
I bought it.
I figured mmmmm x3 SRM6 in the one torso? Brawler buiild.
Nope, the -15% torso speed kicks your arse.
85 ton direwolf without the clan weapons or tonnage.
#88
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:41 PM
#89
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:42 PM
#90
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:42 PM
Valdemaar, on 05 August 2014 - 12:29 PM, said:
Or at least a Spider hero
We have a spider hero, Anansi. Check your skill tree. t hasn't been entered into the game yet.
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...b#i=203&l=stock
EDIT:We are also getting 1 or 2 new IS mechs very soon. People are speculating either the Mauler, or the Vindicator are going to make their debut.
Calamus, on 05 August 2014 - 12:31 PM, said:
You mean 30% C-Bill bonus.
This mech comes with unique hardpoints, and an awesome paint scheme.
Edited by IraqiWalker, 05 August 2014 - 12:50 PM.
#91
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:45 PM
Quote
thanks quickdraw crobat, i haven't bought any TT books for a long time so thought it was one made up by the dev's, my real point was that ferro-fibrous needs something to get players to use it and a quirk might do it
#92
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:49 PM
Bizarre Jay, on 05 August 2014 - 12:45 PM, said:
thanks quickdraw crobat, i haven't bought any TT books for a long time so thought it was one made up by the dev's, my real point was that ferro-fibrous needs something to get players to use it and a quirk might do it
If R&R was in place, there would be a reason to pick FF armor. However, right now, there isn't much. Wait until CW kicks into gear.
#93
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:52 PM
IraqiWalker, on 05 August 2014 - 12:49 PM, said:
If R&R was in place, there would be a reason to pick FF armor. However, right now, there isn't much. Wait until CW kicks into gear.
How would R&R make it valuable? I was here during the brief R&R experiment and FF armor was more expensive to repair each match. It cost to put on, then cost you more each round you played. Worst of both worlds. And, no, it does not increase the max amount of armor you can mount, just makes each point of armor weigh a bit less.
#94
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:53 PM
ALL THOSE METAL BOXES that ruin the torso with cancerboxes. The PPC mounts.
I'd rather have seen smaller tube counts and less bloat in the torso- it could have done fine with 6-tube boxes since they're SRM mounts anyway.
#95
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:54 PM
Kommisar, on 05 August 2014 - 12:52 PM, said:
How would R&R make it valuable? I was here during the brief R&R experiment and FF armor was more expensive to repair each match. It cost to put on, then cost you more each round you played. Worst of both worlds. And, no, it does not increase the max amount of armor you can mount, just makes each point of armor weigh a bit less.
I meant in regards to endo steel. Endo steel cost a LOT more than FF armor to repair. Broken Gyros would cost about 20K to repair.
It would also make people use CASE more.
#96
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:54 PM
#97
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:59 PM
Taranum42, on 05 August 2014 - 10:18 AM, said:
I like the camo but I do believe the position of the left arm PPC was just minimal effort on their part since that is where the Gauss Rifle normally appears and they did not want to bother moving the 'big gun' position to match the other arm.
#99
Posted 05 August 2014 - 01:00 PM
Stop it.
#100
Posted 05 August 2014 - 01:01 PM
Edited by IraqiWalker, 05 August 2014 - 01:04 PM.
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users