Summoner Vs Timberwolf: Why Do You Choose One Over The Other
#1
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:14 PM
If you have piloted both Summoner and Timberwolf Mechs, could you please say which is better for you, and why? When I mean "Why" I don't mean "It's better because I kill more" but rather "it's better because XXXX weapons/armor does this, and YYYYY something does that, which results in me killing/winning more"
I'd like to know how things are from those who piloted them. I haven't piloted them, but I have seen them on the field, and I think [REDACTED]. However, that's unimportant, because I want to know from the mouths of those who have Piloted them.
We value your opinion, and your input is greatly appreciated. Thank you for working with Prosperity Park information services. Have a great day :-)
#2
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:17 PM
I would choose the Timberwolf even if I couldn't have JJs on it.
I would choose my Cataphract and my Jagers before the Summoner, because even though they are squishier - they have weapon load outs that are actually fun.
In fact, I would probably take Shadowhawk, Stormcrow and Nova before I take the Summoner.
#3
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:18 PM
The Suckoner's one semi-advantage is that its more narrow torso profile can be more easily shielded from the side. This means that your arms can be used as shields with a Thor, whereas Mad Cat arms rarely absorb much damage (it goes mostly to the torsos). Otherwise, though, it feels like piloting a morbidly obese medium mech trapped in a heavy's body.
#4
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:19 PM
I am better in the Summoner because Jade Falcon.
#5
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:20 PM
Carrie Harder, on 26 August 2014 - 06:18 PM, said:
The Suckoner's one semi-advantage is that its more narrow torso profile can be more easily shielded from the side. This means that your arms can be used as shields with a Thor, whereas Mad Cat arms rarely absorb much damage (it goes mostly to the torsos). Otherwise, though, it feels like piloting a morbidly obese medium mech trapped in a heavy's body.
Actually the summoner has superior Torso mounts, they are much higher than the TBR and don't require you to expose as much of yourself to hill-poke as the TBR does.
Unfortunately the only sniper weapon you can mount there is the Gauss and you can only take one of them.
If there were Energy hardpoints into those Torso mounts, I'd actually give this mech another go.
2x cLPL in the high Torso mounts would make a solid base for a build.
Edited by Ultimatum X, 26 August 2014 - 06:21 PM.
#6
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:22 PM
Because TWolf bores me. Will run it with my Team as needed. BUT, prefer Summoner. I am a Medium Jock, and it moves a Shadowhawk. Firepower is limited, but to me, that just forces creativity. Twolf....meh. Let the MetaLords have it. I would rather go my own way, and actually have fun, then conform to what the Forums say I should run.
#7
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:25 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 26 August 2014 - 06:22 PM, said:
Don't hate the popular kid just because he's popular. He's not such a bad guy.
Honestly the summoner doesn't feel like my Shadowhawk at all, it just feels like a faster Fataphract.
#8
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:26 PM
Ultimatum X, on 26 August 2014 - 06:20 PM, said:
Actually the summoner has superior Torso mounts, they are much higher than the TBR and don't require you to expose as much of yourself to hill-poke as the TBR does.
Unfortunately the only sniper weapon you can mount there is the Gauss and you can only take one of them.
If there were Energy hardpoints into those Torso mounts, I'd actually give this mech another go.
2x cLPL in the high Torso mounts would make a solid base for a build.
Dem ballistics eat up your tonnage real fast though.
Which is why I still want muh Nicolai Malthus energy boat omnipods.
#9
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:26 PM
#10
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:26 PM
#11
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:30 PM
Ultimatum X, on 26 August 2014 - 06:25 PM, said:
Don't hate the popular kid just because he's popular. He's not such a bad guy.
Honestly the summoner doesn't feel like my Shadowhawk at all, it just feels like a faster Fataphract.
not remotely. Mine dances far better than a Cataphract.
#12
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:32 PM
Carrie Harder, on 26 August 2014 - 06:26 PM, said:
Which is why I still want muh Nicolai Malthus energy boat omnipods.
Those lasers look...leg mounted....
Bishop Steiner, on 26 August 2014 - 06:30 PM, said:
Have you driven a CTF with a 340xl?
Edited by Ultimatum X, 26 August 2014 - 06:32 PM.
#13
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:33 PM
Simply cos it's a f'n Timberwolf!!
#14
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:38 PM
#15
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:44 PM
Ultimatum X, on 26 August 2014 - 06:32 PM, said:
They are. It's Star Colonel Nicolai Malthus' Super Haxx0r Power... fit 3 critical's worth of lasers where there are only 2 criticals!
.... waaaaait a minute, don't Summoners have jumpjets in their legs?
#16
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:47 PM
Scratx, on 26 August 2014 - 06:44 PM, said:
They are. It's Star Colonel Nicolai Malthus' Super Haxx0r Power... fit 3 critical's worth of lasers where there are only 2 criticals!
.... waaaaait a minute, don't Summoners have jumpjets in their legs?
It would certainly be awesome to fire those right under the River City drop ship!
#17
Posted 26 August 2014 - 06:48 PM
Scratx, on 26 August 2014 - 06:44 PM, said:
They are. It's Star Colonel Nicolai Malthus' Super Haxx0r Power... fit 3 critical's worth of lasers where there are only 2 criticals!
.... waaaaait a minute, don't Summoners have jumpjets in their legs?
YOU DARE TO REFUSE MY CONSTRUCTION RULES IGNORING?
#19
Posted 26 August 2014 - 07:16 PM
Ultimatum X, on 26 August 2014 - 06:32 PM, said:
Yes, and I call it the "Suicidephract".
Edited by El Bandito, 26 August 2014 - 07:17 PM.
#20
Posted 26 August 2014 - 07:17 PM
See when I have a mech I like a lot based upon fluff, background story, and decades of TT play experience and then we get a system that limits all the things that make that mech unique or blatantly refuses to make it worthwhile.
Well that leads to frustration.
And frustation isn't fun. So moving on.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users