Jump to content

Should They Segregate The Forums Into Paying And Non-Paying Players?


24 replies to this topic

#21 CDLord HHGD

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,190 posts
  • Location"You're not comp if you're not stock."

Posted 12 September 2014 - 09:32 AM

View PostStalaggtIKE, on 12 September 2014 - 09:31 AM, said:

I see no reason to do that. Perhaps, as someone else posted, a founder lounge for a more intimate environment with the devs.

I like this....

Founders Lounge
Phoenix Lounge
Invasion Lounge

Edited by cdlord, 12 September 2014 - 09:32 AM.


#22 mongo2006

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 171 posts
  • LocationSt. Louis Mo. USA

Posted 12 September 2014 - 09:34 AM

No need to do that OP.. they know the paying payers (whales) are a long way from being happy.. They know their money is slowing down, that's why every day there is a new sale.

Then comes some of the old Kill A Dev trick is being used to get people to play and take out some anger, buy some crap,, hey can we buy a MAP!! I ain't buying it, as a matter of fact I ain't buying crap they have to offer till they listen to players and react.

Many of the founders, and clan pack buyers have said screw it over the last few weeks, but we're all one community, paying or not, I want to hear what all people say.. stupid or not.

#23 Bilbo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 7,864 posts
  • LocationSaline, Michigan

Posted 12 September 2014 - 09:49 AM

No.

#24 CocoaJin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,607 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted 12 September 2014 - 11:22 AM

It's not a good idea to create an artifical rift in a community, unless that rift benefits the game. At this point, the rifts worth having is between IS and Clan, and House vs House. Those rifts promote the purpose of the game.

If you provide any other rift, the inherent nature of man to stand zealously against difference, instead of embracing the common, will inevitably seek to do nothing but tear the community a part. It doesn't matter if it's have or have nots, paying or non-paying, male or female, one ethnic group or another, one belief or another, one desire or another, etc, etc...give us an excuse and we'll use it as a reason to tear each other and what we both value a part in order to feel like you are on the victorious or advantageous side.

If we are going to behave that way, at least lets keep it on the battlefield and the CW map where it belongs.

Sadly, it's not that segregation can't have some benefits in certain circumstances, it's just that the minds and hearts of man is inherently too feeble to handle it responsibly.

#25 Kibble

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 539 posts
  • LocationOakland, CA

Posted 12 September 2014 - 12:05 PM

Non-paying players mean a lot more then you think. They provide content for the people that do pay and vice versa. In an ideal world both parties should be heard equally and should not segregated.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users