Electing A Player "council" Of Sorts
#921
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:53 PM
I still need volunteers to doublecheck my numbers, as they are nearly 100% guaranteed to include mistakes, given the... topic rich discussion within the thread
#922
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:55 PM
Garandos, on 16 September 2014 - 01:53 PM, said:
I still need volunteers to doublecheck my numbers, as they are nearly 100% guaranteed to include mistakes, given the... topic rich discussion within the thread
You could not pay me to sift through 46 pages of MWO forum material. I do accept clan packages though.
#923
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:58 PM
outside of the top ten, you have 119 votes just floating around right now
Edited by Mechwarrior Buddah, 16 September 2014 - 02:00 PM.
#924
Posted 16 September 2014 - 02:00 PM
https://docs.google....dit?usp=sharing
Edited by Tichorius Davion, 16 September 2014 - 02:00 PM.
#926
Posted 16 September 2014 - 02:11 PM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 16 September 2014 - 01:31 PM, said:
NOPE
Gotta know yer EVE history.
The council was formed as a watchdog group to go to Iceland and make sure CCP werent cheating in their own game again as a measure of trust building after the T20 scandal. Then whewn that was deemed impossible, and over the course of a few years, it became what it is now. Your position that it was created because CCP started to trust their players is INCREDIBLY wrong
Quoted for truth.
#927
Posted 16 September 2014 - 02:20 PM
#929
Posted 16 September 2014 - 02:28 PM
#930
Posted 16 September 2014 - 02:35 PM
KharnZor, on 16 September 2014 - 02:11 PM, said:
I was there man, I was there
But yeah just posting the history of the WHY it weas made. I think that psart used to be in the wiki
SiliconLife, on 16 September 2014 - 02:20 PM, said:
So was I until today
Heffay, on 16 September 2014 - 02:28 PM, said:
if by band you mean #savemwo, then yes
Edited by Mechwarrior Buddah, 16 September 2014 - 02:35 PM.
#931
Posted 16 September 2014 - 02:36 PM
#935
Posted 16 September 2014 - 03:05 PM
(WB btw)
#936
Posted 16 September 2014 - 03:08 PM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 16 September 2014 - 01:26 PM, said:
EVE Is a sandbox MMO of a very unique design focused on consequental PVP competition. This gives such a council that kind of a dynamic, this won't be the case really for MWO aside from issues like IS vs Clan balancing which PGI can probably ride roughshot over.
#937
Posted 16 September 2014 - 03:14 PM
MisterPlanetarian, on 16 September 2014 - 03:08 PM, said:
EVE Is a sandbox MMO of a very unique design focused on consequental PVP competition. This gives such a council that kind of a dynamic, this won't be the case really for MWO aside from issues like IS vs Clan balancing which PGI can probably ride roughshot over.
Which is why a coincil like the one in EVE would only WORK in EVE. Copy/pastaing that here would be worse than bad
#938
Posted 16 September 2014 - 03:43 PM
As an illustration of my concerns, look back at all of the derision aimed at my opinion. This to me is a clear indicator of the precise problem I am speaking to. If you all were truly open to the ideas proposed by others you would have asked questions rather than try to drown out a voice you do not agree with. My point is adequately proven.
Also, I understood full well what this thread is about and that is why my plea is to PGI.
Edited by Ayenn Destiny, 16 September 2014 - 03:47 PM.
#939
Posted 16 September 2014 - 04:08 PM
Ayenn Destiny, on 16 September 2014 - 03:43 PM, said:
As an illustration of my concerns, look back at all of the derision aimed at my opinion. This to me is a clear indicator of the precise problem I am speaking to. If you all were truly open to the ideas proposed by others you would have asked questions rather than try to drown out a voice you do not agree with. My point is adequately proven.
Also, I understood full well what this thread is about and that is why my plea is to PGI.
So, yeah, read every single word that was directed at you since your post...
Derision, really? Hyperbolic much?
They disagreed with you, and pointed out that this is, in fact, sort of PGIs idea.
That's not deriding you, that's telling you that they think you're wrong.
I know in today's touchy-feely world where everyone gets a trophy for showing up, that it may feel like you're being attacked if someone isn't agreeing with you, but this is the real world, not academia where SJWs protect every wittle peeling as each is precious and unique as a snowflake.
THAT is derision. See the difference?
Edited by Roadbeer, 16 September 2014 - 04:14 PM.
#940
Posted 16 September 2014 - 04:19 PM
I want to try and move this concept forward, obviously this is a tough one with no shortage of ideas. There are a decent number of people out there that still are opposed to the concept or at least are somewhat fearful of the outcome.
I want to again assure everyone that were going to take this nice and slow and see if we can't create something that works for MWO. I won't go out and commit to a system that is already out there like say EVE, perhaps we end up there perhaps we don't. I am more interested in finding a nice balance between PGI and it's community. That is the starting point I think we all agree.
Ideally I think it should be a small manageable number, 12 is likley at the very far end of managable, but we also want to make sure everyone is represented.
The only idea I have currently is to take this thread, invite everyone that has been nominated to a teamspeak server. The first order of business will be discussing together how we can widdle that group down a manageable size, vote on that group of players for perhaps a certain "term"?
Once they are in place we can focus on our first Subject whether that remains ECM or perhaps a softball or two out the gate.
Thoughts?
15 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 15 guests, 0 anonymous users