Hi All
#21
Posted 16 September 2014 - 12:56 PM
How does it feel to be back ?
#22
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:03 PM
Welcome back, one and all
#23
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:07 PM
#24
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:09 PM
TLBFestus, on 16 September 2014 - 12:39 PM, said:
With that in mind let's remind both sides (White or Black Knights) not to "poke the bear". Try not to provoke, try not to respond, because I really want to her some fresh opinions around here.
My plan is to, for one last time, give PGI a pass and fresh start, mostly because they are free of IGP and have only themselves to blame and because they seem to be communicating better recently. That, I hope, lasts much longer than the release fo the 2nd Clan Pack for a change.
There are no "sides."
#25
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:18 PM
#27
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:23 PM
That took me hours to make back in the day... I thimnk im gonna go lay down, I think the cough medicine is making me loopy
#28
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:29 PM
Welcome back everyone.
Mwb it was no joke - you were nominated in the hopes you would get back here.
#29
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:38 PM
MischiefSC, on 16 September 2014 - 01:29 PM, said:
Welcome back everyone.
Mwb it was no joke - you were nominated in the hopes you would get back here.
Wel then, if I was an honest nominee Id accept it if I was ever elected
The reason I thought it was a joke was cause it said it weas a joke in the google doc
Edited by Mechwarrior Buddah, 16 September 2014 - 01:38 PM.
#31
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:43 PM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 16 September 2014 - 01:38 PM, said:
Wel then, if I was an honest nominee Id accept it if I was ever elected
The reason I thought it was a joke was cause it said it weas a joke in the google doc
The google doc is open for anyone to edit. Guess what happens?
Have a look at this, it's actually Russ' idea we form a "player council":
Russ Bullock, on 12 September 2014 - 10:57 AM, said:
Well first a question: Do you think you the community can come to an agreed upon consensus? One in which if the changes are implemented everyone says great job PGI on listening to us now we feel great about ECM and your ability to listen to feedback?
If the answer is Yes then I suggest the following:
You the community decide how your going to present a proposal, nominate a peer that you feel has the best handle on this, put together your own player council whatever you like but present a proposal that your peers vote on. The vote would likely need to be far greater than just 51% in favor. Perhaps something more like 80+%
At that point PGI will analyze the proposal, if we see any technical problems or balance problems that we feel perhaps you didnt see, we will point those items out to you. Then if necessary you can adjust your proposal and put it to a vote again, if successful PGI will again analyze and repeat if necessary until we have a final design solution for implementation.
PGI will then communicate how long it will take to implement with full explanation as to why, and we will patch the changes in upon the agreed upon delivery date. Once complete if this whole process has gone smoothly and civily we will proceed with doing things like this far more frequently or at least for other areas of the product that are controversial.
What do you say?
#32
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:45 PM
stjobe, on 16 September 2014 - 01:43 PM, said:
Have a look at this, it's actually Russ' idea we form a "player council":
Ya, I (obviously) came back after that and didnt know it was sanctioned
but (as I said to him actually) 80% is a silly number for the forums or for anything short of putting the poll into the client and giving an incentive to the players to participate in it. They even admitted the people who come to the forums is a pittance compared to the ppl that play the game as a whole, in the 3pv thread
Edited by Mechwarrior Buddah, 16 September 2014 - 01:48 PM.
#33
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:46 PM
#35
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:50 PM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 16 September 2014 - 01:38 PM, said:
Wel then, if I was an honest nominee Id accept it if I was ever elected
The reason I thought it was a joke was cause it said it weas a joke in the google doc
I nominate you by the power invested in me by being the bloody doc creator.
#36
Posted 16 September 2014 - 02:12 PM
#39
Posted 16 September 2014 - 03:49 PM
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users