

A Simple Solution To Allow Jump Jets To Regain Their Jump, Without Enabling Pin-Point Poptarting.
#21
Posted 19 September 2014 - 12:55 PM
#22
Posted 19 September 2014 - 12:57 PM
Hagoromo Gitsune, on 19 September 2014 - 12:25 PM, said:

JJ nerf actually massively affected IS mechs mobiliy.
I would prefer heavy aiming-reticule shake. Screen shake can give headache; better to prevent whiners
#23
Posted 19 September 2014 - 01:00 PM
In TT jump jet grant X amount of movement so we need to better convert that to MWO.
#24
Posted 19 September 2014 - 01:02 PM
Personally, I feel the height JJs are normalized at currently is fine-ish. It's the time it takes to jump/acceleration I think is where people are having issues with. So perhaps make each jet class rocket the mech up faster than current levels at a set rate, but how many you mount determines the length of time you can burn.
Something like that I think would be a good middle ground.
#25
Posted 19 September 2014 - 01:08 PM
Firemage, on 19 September 2014 - 01:00 PM, said:
In TT jump jet grant X amount of movement so we need to better convert that to MWO.
NO!
#26
Posted 19 September 2014 - 01:19 PM
El Bandito, on 19 September 2014 - 11:34 AM, said:
That and implement DFA.
I felt a great disturbance in the Inner Sphere, as if millions of jump-brawling lights suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.
#27
Posted 19 September 2014 - 04:59 PM
CapperDeluxe, on 19 September 2014 - 11:35 AM, said:
http://youtu.be/GF8uZ4VYRW8?t=1m22s
Totally agree with Lucy here, jets can be fun and simultaneously not terrible (for both the attacker and defender) if done right.
That concept seems nice on paper and in that vid until you realise that MWLL doesn't have leg damage as a thing. Imagine how much damage he just did to his legs with that stunt. Those Boost-Jets don't look nearly as nice with the current leg damage system in place.
Prezimonto, on 19 September 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:
I don't think so at all. Particularly when the force is being applied well off center mass of a large gangling object in mid-air. Add that many of these weapons are already greatly unbalances the mass distribution of the mech when then pack a large percentage of overall mass out on a limb.
That's what majik overpowered Gyros and Neuro Helmets are for. But yea in a perfect game we would have a physics engine that allows for recoil as it is described in the stuff I've read. Having to brace to fire off 2 Gauss rifles because otherwise your machine would just tip backwards would be nice.
Though going that route is kinda like the difference between WoT and WTGF. Both are tank shooters, both are fun. One is an arcade one is doing it's best to not be and both push people away for those reasons. How "realistic" should this game really be?
#28
Posted 19 September 2014 - 08:43 PM
Prezimonto, on 19 September 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:
I don't think so at all. Particularly when the force is being applied well off center mass of a large gangling object in mid-air. Add that many of these weapons are already greatly unbalances the mass distribution of the mech when then pack a large percentage of overall mass out on a limb.
I tried to explain that guns far away from the center of mass and balance cause amplified recoil through simple pendulum physics, in another thread, but people insisted there was no difference between firing a large caliber gun from your hip and firing it from the shoulder, legs unbraced.
What do I know though, I'm a liberal arts grad with a lot of guns.
#29
Posted 19 September 2014 - 09:33 PM
At full burn with all jump jet slots full, the best I can manage in my Huginn is a 25 degree slow glide. And that's if I get a 130+ kph running start. Sure it might carry me 120 or so meters horizontally, but I can just barely make it over a 2 story building in the attempt. And that's only if I time it perfectly. The rate of climb is horrendous. The only benefit is that it's slightly faster than running.
It's pitiful. There is no more tactical use of jump jets in a fight. You just get your legs blown off while you try to climb.
Something needs to be done for sure.
Edited by ArchMage Sparrowhawk, 19 September 2014 - 09:36 PM.
#30
Posted 19 September 2014 - 10:15 PM
Fly to correct height> find target> let go of jumpjet> shoot> drop> repeat.
it should be more akin to.
Press jumpjet and get flung madly into sky>let go of jumpjet> fire as you still fly upwards>take some return fire>get to top of arc and start dropping> land somewhere 50-150 meters away from start position, with leg damage if you don't feather the fall.
You'd jump alot higher and further, poptarting would still be possible but have a higher skill requirement(lets face it it used to be just too damn easy) and be less safe because exposing yourself would be unavoidible unless you had the skill to calculate the arc, and height you need well in advance of letting go of the jumpjet button, as opposed to just letting go and instantly falling to safety like everyone used to.
#31
Posted 20 September 2014 - 03:16 AM
#32
Posted 20 September 2014 - 05:16 AM
Lefty Lucy, on 19 September 2014 - 11:37 AM, said:
Which is why jump jets weigh a lot more for heavier mechs.
Exactly. An assault class JJ weighs 4 times that of a light class, it should have 4 times the thrust so 5 JJs on a 90 ton mechs should give at least as much jump as 5 JJs on a 30 ton mech.
#33
Posted 20 September 2014 - 05:29 AM
Gas Guzzler, on 19 September 2014 - 12:23 PM, said:
But I mean lights and mediums with their .5 ton jump jets.. Yeah you should expect to take like 4-6 of em and in that case they work fine. Doesn't make sense to get all the hops in the world with 1-2 jets.
I am one of those players that feels JJ are useless now, which is what it is but it vexes me I can't get rid of them on my Summoners that i spent a good deal of money to prepurcase. When I bought them they were totally different. . LET ME GET RID OF THEM at the very least.
#34
Posted 20 September 2014 - 12:31 PM
Training Instructor, on 19 September 2014 - 08:43 PM, said:
What do I know though, I'm a liberal arts grad with a lot of guns.
I only have a PhD in biophysics and have taught college introductory physics courses. Must not be good enough for understanding statics and dynamics though. How silly of me, that bio in the front of the degree must trump the rest.
#35
Posted 20 September 2014 - 12:34 PM
El Bandito, on 19 September 2014 - 11:34 AM, said:
That and implement DFA.
Nah just make them really inaccurate while in the air. No reason to lock them out completely, up close it wouldn't be an issue at all anyway.
Either way pop-tarting is a fairly legit tactic that's well-countered by fast and lazy laser hits. I think it's in the gameplay intentionally. Landing a tricky jump shot, especially while under fire, can be difficult.
#36
Posted 20 September 2014 - 05:03 PM
divinedisclaimer, on 20 September 2014 - 12:34 PM, said:
Except lasers don't do anything to throw off poptart's aim.
#37
Posted 20 September 2014 - 06:00 PM
Make JJs launch you forward at a 30deg angle when facing forward...but require you be looking as far down as the mech can in order to launch straight up. This means vertical jumps require you to take your view off of a would be distant target, but would allow for you to keep eyes on a close quarter brawling range targets for vertical combat maneuvers.
Pilot view/torso elevations would control thrust vectoring for graduate changes in between.
#38
Posted 20 September 2014 - 06:51 PM
AssaultPig, on 19 September 2014 - 11:50 AM, said:
JJs probably did generally need a bigger opportunity cost though, which the current de facto requirement to fit more of them for the same lift did accomplish
The problem is there is NO WAY to obtain the same lift... the code was changed.
#39
Posted 20 September 2014 - 08:23 PM
#40
Posted 20 September 2014 - 11:45 PM
jumpjets now take more tonnage and are actually a trade off as opposed to the divine 1 ton jetpack that made It superior to any non jj mech instantly
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users