


Awww Hell Naw! Vote Black Knight!
Started by Mahpsy, Oct 06 2014 01:59 AM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 06 October 2014 - 01:59 AM
BECAUSE ITS PRETTY! F%#$ THE META! MW4 FANS UNITE!(I'm going to get crucified lol)

#2
Posted 06 October 2014 - 02:14 AM
Oh no you don't.
I'm pretty sure this one...

... can survive longer than the Black Knight can. Seriously. It lost both legs and it still kept going. Lostech I think.
I'm pretty sure this one...

... can survive longer than the Black Knight can. Seriously. It lost both legs and it still kept going. Lostech I think.
#3
Posted 06 October 2014 - 02:19 AM
You mean this one?

#4
Posted 06 October 2014 - 02:21 AM
That art is very different from the original/canon appearance for the mech. While Alex is of course free to draw his own concept for the Black Knight, I would not expect it to look like that particular version, since that is a "Dark Age" variant and not the regular variant

not nearly as impressive

not nearly as impressive
#5
Posted 06 October 2014 - 02:25 AM
Redshift2k5, on 06 October 2014 - 02:21 AM, said:
That art is very different from the original/canon appearance for the mech. While Alex is of course free to draw his own concept for the Black Knight, I would not expect it to look like that particular version, since that is a "Dark Age" variant and not the regular variant

not nearly as impressive

not nearly as impressive
I always wondered, why does it have two different legs.
#6
Posted 06 October 2014 - 02:30 AM
I just don't think they can make the Grasshopper work in MWO right now and I know they can't make the BK work without throwing out DHS 2.0, so I voted for BK because it will be trash with only DHS 2.0's.
And the Mech that MWO really needed was the 75 ton Warhammer predecessor, Hammerhands. It would be the top mech of the Inner Sphere Heavy Class.
And the Mech that MWO really needed was the 75 ton Warhammer predecessor, Hammerhands. It would be the top mech of the Inner Sphere Heavy Class.
Edited by Lightfoot, 06 October 2014 - 02:34 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users