

Looking at all the dev posts/pics/vids it seems the Hunchback is the main money grinder
#1
Posted 24 June 2012 - 12:29 AM
#2
Posted 24 June 2012 - 12:39 AM
But I completely agree, mediums will most likely be where it's at with this game.
Edited by ScientificMethod, 24 June 2012 - 12:40 AM.
#3
Posted 24 June 2012 - 12:40 AM
#4
Posted 24 June 2012 - 12:41 AM
#5
Posted 24 June 2012 - 12:43 AM
Riffleman, on 24 June 2012 - 12:40 AM, said:
What do you like so much about the Warhammer? There are lots of mechs that sport two PPC's so it has to be more than that I'd assume?
SnakePliskin, on 24 June 2012 - 12:41 AM, said:
Here you go, http://mwowiki.org/ Look at the confirmed mechs.
Edited by ScientificMethod, 24 June 2012 - 12:44 AM.
#6
Posted 24 June 2012 - 12:47 AM
ScientificMethod, on 24 June 2012 - 12:43 AM, said:
What do you like so much about the Warhammer? There are lots of mechs that sport two PPC's so it has to be more than that I'd assume?
Here you go, http://mwowiki.org/ Look at the confirmed mechs.
I like the warhammer because I am a robotech and old school battletech fan. It has alot more history then most mechs in the game.
#7
Posted 24 June 2012 - 12:51 AM
#8
Posted 24 June 2012 - 12:52 AM
#9
Posted 24 June 2012 - 12:57 AM
WalkingDeathBot, on 24 June 2012 - 12:29 AM, said:
These posts are staying to irk me. And just how do you know they will be cheap to repair how do you know it will cost less to repair this mech than an atlas? What if the huntchback was the most expensive of all the mechs to repair you don't know no one knows I don't even think the devs know. Stop assuming things.
#10
Posted 24 June 2012 - 01:01 AM
Dijalin, on 24 June 2012 - 12:57 AM, said:
We're extrapolating on known data and common sense, every videogame (even the ones that didn't care about fitting into the battletech universe) has had repairbills scale based on size, it's in cannon, and TT rules. The dev's have hinted that the medium mech is going to be the workhorse of this game and that they are cheaper to run. Lower costs = more money brought home.
#11
Posted 24 June 2012 - 01:02 AM
#12
Posted 24 June 2012 - 01:05 AM
(Fumes over not being able to turn founders Hunchie into the Swayback!)
#13
Posted 24 June 2012 - 01:13 AM
Dijalin, on 24 June 2012 - 12:57 AM, said:
These posts are staying to irk me. And just how do you know they will be cheap to repair how do you know it will cost less to repair this mech than an atlas? What if the huntchback was the most expensive of all the mechs to repair you don't know no one knows I don't even think the devs know. Stop assuming things.
Bryan Ekman, on 21 June 2012 - 07:11 AM, said:
This is essential correct, except you will have proportionall risk vs reward. Cost are less for lights, but you make less money. Costs are high for assault, so you make more money. The net yield after repairs is going to be similar.
Non one class will make NET CB faster.
So it may not be the "grind" Mech, but it will be cheaper to repair then the big guys. I think the big difference will be the "Oh ****, Atlas!" factor causing many pilots to not focus on a medium as their primary target that will give Mechs like the Hunchback their biggest advantage.
Edited by Winters Flight, 24 June 2012 - 01:18 AM.
#14
Posted 24 June 2012 - 01:20 AM
There are only a handful of Mechs and variants in the game. Hunchback and jenner where what they added first.
#15
Posted 24 June 2012 - 02:52 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users