Jump to content

Stock Mechs/sized Hard-Points - A New Approach

BattleMechs Gameplay Loadout

40 replies to this topic

#41 Nothing Whatsoever

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,655 posts
  • LocationNowhere

Posted 05 October 2014 - 01:50 PM

Yeah, thinking about this idea it can be a good thing for MWO.

I like the idea for example of the 2xAC/20 Jagers sticking those in would see a high DPS short range build (over the current 40 damage FLD) if we would have them fire 5 damage projectiles in the JM6-DD or JM6-S or 2 damage projectiles in the Firebrand or JM6-A at the DPS level of the AC/20 class. I'd probably take that build out if I could get that sort of dakka.

And with those in particular, they were Anti-Air Platforms so for me I like them being able to fire more projectiles like that.




I'd also look at reducing the number of engine options for mechs.

Here's a table with Engines
Spoiler


So for example with the CPLT-K2, with the Stock 260, it could upgrade to 325.

Here is an optimized Standard engine K2 that could be viable if we had more restrictions across the board, such as with engines.

Or sticking an XL 325 into it (Used Jester for the higher engine Cap)

With some quirks to the arms for staying with PPCs, I think that could work for stock builds and basically every mech currently in MWO.

Edited by Praetor Knight, 05 October 2014 - 01:52 PM.






9 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users