Hey Russ....
#1
Posted 08 October 2014 - 10:54 PM
#2
Posted 08 October 2014 - 11:13 PM
#3
Posted 08 October 2014 - 11:16 PM
At least not on Gamemechanics.
#4
Posted 08 October 2014 - 11:28 PM
And given how well the last poll worked, game mechanics shouldn't be decided by the community. We're here to provide feed back on the game not tell them how to make it.
We're good for 3 things: Polls, Populating test servers, And bitching about changes. Lol.. We're really good at that
Edited by Team Chevy86, 09 October 2014 - 05:40 AM.
#5
Posted 09 October 2014 - 05:00 AM
So until such a time as players all know game design, don't ask difficult questions like these.
And it seems Russ or Niko needs some reading up on user test and how to do and read them.
#6
Posted 09 October 2014 - 05:28 AM
#7
Posted 09 October 2014 - 05:32 AM
Xarian, on 09 October 2014 - 05:28 AM, said:
And at the moment i even doubt that.
Lets see how this BK/Grasshopper 49,99 to 50,01 turns out.
#8
Posted 09 October 2014 - 05:32 AM
Savage Wolf, on 09 October 2014 - 05:00 AM, said:
So until such a time as players all know game design, don't ask difficult questions like these.
And it seems Russ or Niko needs some reading up on user test and how to do and read them.
Problem is there is place for GH in this universe. 3 Vats of solutions kept at 130 degrees in a confined space, and the ambient temp is only 7 degrees higher than outside the room. GH Would have the room at 170 degrees or higher!
#9
Posted 09 October 2014 - 05:36 AM
Xarian, on 09 October 2014 - 05:28 AM, said:
I generally agree with this however in an ideal (unrealistic) situation where ever person voting has complete understanding of the pros and cons of the polled mechanic the results could be useful. In terms of reality though? Based on the general gaming level of play in this community... Most polls actually cause more harm than good. I'd rather people that actually no what they are talking about be involved in game development, not mobs of under hive plebs.
#10
Posted 09 October 2014 - 05:39 AM
Edited by Lord de Seis, 09 October 2014 - 05:39 AM.
#11
Posted 09 October 2014 - 05:41 AM
Replace ghostheat with a COF for firing multiple weapons at once.
Or increase ghost heat to cause damage to mech when exceeding "alpha cap".
I wonder what the vote would look like on that poll?
#12
Posted 09 October 2014 - 07:14 AM
#13
Posted 09 October 2014 - 07:16 AM
Sirius Drake, on 09 October 2014 - 05:32 AM, said:
Lets see how this BK/Grasshopper 49,99 to 50,01 turns out.
I see your point, but I'm not talking about an "A or B" system. I mean like, if they gave us a list of 20 mechs, polls would work really well to narrow that down to 1-3 choices.
#14
Posted 09 October 2014 - 07:17 AM
P.S as to ghost heat I don't mind it so much as it keeps boating down but I would lik to see PGI fix all the heat sinks single and double so they regenerate your heat cooling capability a bit faster.
Edited by PappySmurf, 09 October 2014 - 07:28 AM.
#15
Posted 09 October 2014 - 07:24 AM
Initial poll: 70%+ agree it should be removed
Ghost heat removed from game
QQ and threats to quit ensue after people get killed by Novas , PPC Stalkers/Direwhales and other boats in a fraction of the time they are currently dieing in.
New poll goes up: Initial overwhelming majority is lost, ghost heat reinstated
#16
Posted 09 October 2014 - 07:26 AM
Yes, even the Pulse variety.
#17
Posted 09 October 2014 - 07:26 AM
Lord de Seis, on 09 October 2014 - 05:39 AM, said:
I hate square pegging the round hole, but PGI created the 4/6 ppc stalker design problem. Sadly since PGI is unwilling to changes things only add to the problem.... GH is here to stay.
#18
Posted 09 October 2014 - 01:45 PM
Tombstoner, on 09 October 2014 - 07:26 AM, said:
Ghost heat is not as terrible as people make it out to be, it effectively solves the problem of boating and still allows players quite a bit of freedom in customization.
Edited by Lord de Seis, 09 October 2014 - 02:12 PM.
#19
Posted 09 October 2014 - 01:50 PM
#20
Posted 09 October 2014 - 01:56 PM
Sure ghost heat is not a working thing at all, but without having a better designed solution there is no need to remove it. GH works and does some good things buit has inconsitencies. why can i not spam 9 CERML and get penalised while i can spam 5 CERMl + 2 CLPL? that makes no sense because if I get the choice to face an opponent with 7 CERML or the other combo, I woud say 7 CERML are less a threat. Then people can still combine crazy stuff being worse than anything else.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users