

Lets Go Ahead And Remove Negative Victor Quirks.
#1
Posted 15 October 2014 - 02:09 PM
#2
Posted 15 October 2014 - 03:05 PM
XX Sulla XX, on 15 October 2014 - 02:09 PM, said:
Oh ho no you don't!
You sit and wait for your quirks like the rest of us. Victors come in as tier 1 mechs without negative quirks - which means that your quirks, which is what we're all waiting for, are the removal of the negatives.
Keep your pants on, be patient.
#3
Posted 15 October 2014 - 03:10 PM
#4
Posted 15 October 2014 - 03:17 PM

#5
Posted 15 October 2014 - 03:33 PM
Christof Romulus, on 15 October 2014 - 03:05 PM, said:
Actually I believe they stated they listed Victors under tier 1 under the assumption that the negative quirks were removed. They're certainly not tier 1 with them, and I don't see that many out.
Who knows though, with how much PPC and JJ's have changed since the original nerfing, it might be that the Victor isn't that great anymore even with the nerfs removed
#6
Posted 15 October 2014 - 03:55 PM
Troutmonkey, on 15 October 2014 - 03:33 PM, said:
Who knows though, with how much PPC and JJ's have changed since the original nerfing, it might be that the Victor isn't that great anymore even with the nerfs removed
Victor's are still the ******* child of an Atlas and a Shawk, even with these nerfs.
I find them to be a more challenging opponent than most other Assaults, they're still fairly mobile.
#7
Posted 15 October 2014 - 04:06 PM
Quote
Who knows though, with how much PPC and JJ's have changed since the original nerfing, it might be that the Victor isn't that great anymore even with the nerfs removed
#8
Posted 15 October 2014 - 06:29 PM

#9
Posted 15 October 2014 - 06:41 PM
#10
Posted 15 October 2014 - 08:20 PM
#12
Posted 15 October 2014 - 09:00 PM
Edited by Macster16, 15 October 2014 - 09:01 PM.
#13
Posted 15 October 2014 - 09:22 PM
#14
Posted 15 October 2014 - 09:23 PM
Glythe, on 15 October 2014 - 09:22 PM, said:
Other than making the 80 tonner not turn like a 100 tonner.
That's all this quirk is fixing; it's removing a nerf, not giving it a buff.
#15
Posted 15 October 2014 - 09:39 PM
Mcgral18, on 15 October 2014 - 09:23 PM, said:
But as you point out it clearly would be a buff because it would perform better than it does now. Why give one IS mech a buff before all the buffs are ready? What possible purpose could it serve?
They already know how to fix that mech. They're trying to decide how to fix the rest of them. They don't want to gather a bunch of metrics about the one IS mech they already know would be competitive once it gets fixed. They want to know how ALL the IS mechs will play once they get their buffs.
It makes perfect sense..... so suck it up and wait like the rest of us.
#16
Posted 15 October 2014 - 10:49 PM

#17
Posted 15 October 2014 - 11:18 PM
What? You do it, then i may do it as well.
Please be patience......
Edited by Sarlic, 15 October 2014 - 11:18 PM.
#18
Posted 15 October 2014 - 11:26 PM
Glythe, on 15 October 2014 - 09:22 PM, said:
Dunno if this was in response to me, but if it was - I don't fancy the Victor, even before all the nerfs. I tried to get into them last year back when Victors reigned supreme by buying the 9S, but sold it because it didn't suit my playstyle. So even if the nerfs were reversed, I still probably wouldn't get into them so I'm not arguing to suit myself when I suggest the nerfs should be reversed.
Call it what you want, but IMO, in its current iteration, the Victor is in need of improvements. What made it so good before? Its JJ maneuverability and its poptart potential. But with nerfs to JJs, nerfs to PPCs, clamp down on the poptart playstyle along with specific nerfs targetted at the chassis specifically to top it all off, the mech got shafted too badly and reversing the nerfs would be a good place to start IMO to make it viable without making it OP again.
Edited by Macster16, 15 October 2014 - 11:27 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users