Jump to content

Primary Objective Challenge


28 replies to this topic

#1 Farix

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 890 posts

Posted 16 October 2014 - 04:33 PM

And there will be much weeping and gnashing of teeth. But it is good to see PGI actually promoting the primary objectives of Assault and Conquest by doubling the point values for the upcoming Challenge. But I'm sure there will be plenty of players doing the usual "Capwarrior" QQing. And I shall enjoy the tears.

#2 CycKath

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,580 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • LocationSE QLD, Australia

Posted 16 October 2014 - 04:42 PM

View PostFarix, on 16 October 2014 - 04:33 PM, said:

And there will be much weeping and gnashing of teeth. But it is good to see PGI actually promoting the primary objectives of Assault and Conquest by doubling the point values for the upcoming Challenge. But I'm sure there will be plenty of players doing the usual "Capwarrior" QQing. And I shall enjoy the tears.


Hmm, I have 23 empty 'Mechs bays, little interest in Clanners and all the Shadow Hawks I need, curious if anything else will be on sale.

At least its a non-individual tournament rather than a challenge and is both solo and group queue, so fairly benign effect on play as opposed to LURM-time of the other recent challenges and tournaments.

#3 Deathlike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 29,240 posts
  • Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad

Posted 16 October 2014 - 04:48 PM

What challenge are you talking about? If you're talking about last weekend's challenge... well...

#4 Budor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,565 posts

Posted 16 October 2014 - 04:51 PM

Posted Image

https://mwomercs.com/tournaments

Edited by Budor, 16 October 2014 - 04:52 PM.


#5 Farix

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 890 posts

Posted 16 October 2014 - 05:48 PM

Quote

As you play, each match adds points to the Primary Objective score total, using the following values:
  • Assault
    • Primary Objective: Capture the enemy base - 20 points (per match).
    • Secondary Objective: Destroy the enemy team - 10 points.
    • Draw - 5 points.
  • Conquest
    • Primary Objective: Acquire the maximum resource points - 20 points.
    • Secondary Objective: Destroy the enemy team - 10 points.
    • Draw - 5 points.
  • Skirmish
    • Primary Objective: Destroy the enemy team - 15 points.
    • Draw - 5 points.


#6 Mcgral18

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • 17,987 posts
  • LocationSnow

Posted 16 October 2014 - 05:58 PM

Wait...half price DoomCrow?

#7 Deathlike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 29,240 posts
  • Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad

Posted 16 October 2014 - 06:10 PM

View PostBudor, on 16 October 2014 - 04:51 PM, said:



Looks good, though I didn't see an announcement or anything on the main page of the website. It's great if people actually link to stuff being referenced so it isn't a mystery to all.


View PostMcgral18, on 16 October 2014 - 05:58 PM, said:

Wait...half price DoomCrow?


It looks like it. I guess a massive grind for pricing is the goal. MUST GET IT HALF OFF!!!

#8 Sky Hawk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 700 posts
  • LocationDeep Periphery, aka Hungary

Posted 16 October 2014 - 11:54 PM

BUT, WHY IT IS, NOT IN THE FORUM/ANNOUNCEMENTS OR ON THE MAIN WEBSIDE? JUST WHY? :angry:

#9 Sirius Drake

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Altruist
  • The Altruist
  • 467 posts
  • LocationThe Aett

Posted 17 October 2014 - 12:15 AM

View PostSky Hawk, on 16 October 2014 - 11:54 PM, said:

BUT, WHY IT IS, NOT IN THE FORUM/ANNOUNCEMENTS OR ON THE MAIN WEBSIDE? JUST WHY? :angry:


Because the challanges always get injected one day ahead. So if you know where to look for them you can find them "early".
Announcment will come as soon as PGI is back in the office.
Its pretty early in the Morning there at the Moment, you know.

#10 Elizander

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 7,540 posts
  • LocationPhilippines

Posted 17 October 2014 - 12:32 AM

Well it would only take 22,500 matches that win via objective or 45,000 matches that win via secondary objective.

#11 Sirius Drake

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Altruist
  • The Altruist
  • 467 posts
  • LocationThe Aett

Posted 17 October 2014 - 12:33 AM

View PostElizander, on 17 October 2014 - 12:32 AM, said:

Well it would only take 22,500 matches that win via objective or 45,000 matches that win via secondary objective.


Bah, thats just too easy!......

#12 Elizander

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 7,540 posts
  • LocationPhilippines

Posted 17 October 2014 - 12:36 AM

View PostSirius Drake, on 17 October 2014 - 12:33 AM, said:

Bah, thats just too easy!......


Seems like it's a shoo-in unless our numbers are really, really low. :o

I'd extend it up exponentially to 75% past 50% for the extra effort.

Edited by Elizander, 17 October 2014 - 12:36 AM.


#13 AlexEss

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 2,491 posts
  • Locationthe ol north

Posted 17 October 2014 - 12:38 AM

View PostSky Hawk, on 16 October 2014 - 11:54 PM, said:

BUT, WHY IT IS, NOT IN THE FORUM/ANNOUNCEMENTS OR ON THE MAIN WEBSIDE? JUST WHY? :angry:


Because compared to pretty much ANY other mode of communication it is ineffective in reaching people. Sorry to say but it is the hard truth.

I could ofc flip that question and ask why YOU do not use any more efficient mode of communication then this here fourm. =P

#14 Thrudvangar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 646 posts

Posted 17 October 2014 - 12:50 AM

View PostSky Hawk, on 16 October 2014 - 11:54 PM, said:

BUT, WHY IT IS, NOT IN THE FORUM/ANNOUNCEMENTS OR ON THE MAIN WEBSIDE? JUST WHY? :angry:



http://mwomercs.com/...urnament-infos/

View PostAlexEss, on 17 October 2014 - 12:38 AM, said:

I could ofc flip that question and ask why YOU do not use any more efficient mode of communication then this here fourm. =P



because its the official website/forum for this game?

lol ;)

#15 Farix

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 890 posts

Posted 17 October 2014 - 03:35 AM

View PostThrudvangar, on 17 October 2014 - 12:50 AM, said:

because its the official website/forum for this game?

lol ;)

They also have Twitter and Facebook accounts.

#16 Vassago Rain

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 14,396 posts
  • LocationExodus fleet, HMS Kong Circumflex accent

Posted 17 October 2014 - 03:39 AM

So why doesn't everybody just play on skirmish then?

#17 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 17 October 2014 - 03:44 AM

View PostBudor, on 16 October 2014 - 04:51 PM, said:


No interest in this other than honing my Light Mech's Capping skillz.

View PostAlexEss, on 17 October 2014 - 12:38 AM, said:


Because compared to pretty much ANY other mode of communication it is ineffective in reaching people. Sorry to say but it is the hard truth.

I could ofc flip that question and ask why YOU do not use any more efficient mode of communication then this here fourm. =P

How is a secondary source (twitter) better at disseminating MW:O info than the OFFICIAL site? Secondary sites should NEVER be the go-to for getting "the scoop". Ever!

#18 Ozric

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Commander
  • Nova Commander
  • 1,188 posts
  • LocationSunny Southsea

Posted 17 October 2014 - 03:46 AM

View PostVassago Rain, on 17 October 2014 - 03:39 AM, said:

So why doesn't everybody just play on skirmish then?


5 less points a match, that's why. Skirmish matches will not be able to keep up with base rushing assault games for points vs time.

Edit: Assuming anyone cares enough to pick gamemodes in this challenge. :P

Edited by Ozric, 17 October 2014 - 03:47 AM.


#19 Vassago Rain

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 14,396 posts
  • LocationExodus fleet, HMS Kong Circumflex accent

Posted 17 October 2014 - 03:48 AM

View PostOzric, on 17 October 2014 - 03:46 AM, said:


5 less points a match, that's why. Skirmish matches will not be able to keep up with base rushing assault games for points vs time.

Edit: Assuming anyone cares enough to pick gamemodes in this challenge. :P


But a skirmish match is over in 4 minutes, while it takes forever to finish the other two modes.

#20 MFZ

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 191 posts

Posted 17 October 2014 - 04:13 AM

View PostFarix, on 16 October 2014 - 04:33 PM, said:

(...) for the upcoming Challenge.(..)

It is a tournament.

View PostDeathlike, on 16 October 2014 - 06:10 PM, said:

It's great if people actually link to stuff being referenced so it isn't a mystery to all.

No link required since all tournaments are visible via the same URL (which has already been posted).

Edited by MFZ, 17 October 2014 - 04:15 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users