Jump to content

How About One-Off Changes Instead Of Sweeping Changes


1 reply to this topic

#1 UrsusMorologus

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • 616 posts

Posted 30 October 2014 - 01:01 PM

Just looking at all the feedback so far, and it seems like the template approach is not really working for people. Maybe it would make more sense to ask for a week of feedback on needed balance for a couple of chassis, then roll out the tweaks to the affected varients in the following patch, and keep it going that way.

I am looking at things like the Raven getting buffs to the legs, and somebody pointed out that the Raven has double-sized hitboxes on the legs... just fixing the hitboxes might be enough? Maybe if we worked through these things deliberately we would catch more of that stuff.

Also it would allow for some deeper discussion on chassis qurks that could be generally useful without producing OP varients. Some of the Cicada tweaks are going to make those builds extremely strong to the point where clanners will be here after the patch demanding their own tweaks. Maybe going one at a time will let us catch some of that too.

Edited by UrsusMorologus, 30 October 2014 - 01:05 PM.


#2 MadPanda

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 2,054 posts
  • LocationSearching for a game...

Posted 30 October 2014 - 01:05 PM

Well pgi does it the other way around. Rather than giving us one change, they give us a lot of changes and let us find the bad ones and then they fix them one at a time.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users