7 replies to this topic

[Kanatta Jing]

I like the 'Victors' challenge mostly because we have pilots being super careful about not dying. To encourage this behavior after this weekend I suggest a 40k isk survivors award be added onto standard ISK rewards.

[Scratx]

Kanatta Jing, on 21 November 2014 - 09:42 PM, said:

I like the 'Victors' challenge mostly because we have pilots being super careful about not dying. To encourage this behavior after this weekend I suggest a 40k isk survivors award be added onto standard ISK rewards.

*cough* This isn't Eve Online. *cough*

[Brody319]

What we need is more rewards all around. ECM coverage rewards, AMS coverage rewards, damage taken rewards, focus fire rewards.

[Wintersdark]

Honestly, I think the surviving requirement is the only part of this that isn't great. Makes people do stupid things and throw matches once they have a kill+assist.

Also: c-bills.

[Agent 0 Fortune]

******** has left the building. please follow.

[Bhael Fire]

Wintersdark, on 21 November 2014 - 10:02 PM, said:

Honestly, I think the surviving requirement is the only part of this that isn't great. Makes people do stupid things and throw matches once they have a kill+assist.

Those players are stupid. You still need to win...if you "throw" the match after you get your kill and assist but you lose, you FAIL the challenge.

Fundamental logic disconnect right there.

[KraftySOT]

I got it. I chucked.

Well played.

[Sandpit]

Wintersdark, on 21 November 2014 - 10:02 PM, said:

Honestly, I think the surviving requirement is the only part of this that isn't great. Makes people do stupid things and throw matches once they have a kill+assist.

Also: c-bills.

Bhael Fire, on 21 November 2014 - 10:12 PM, said:

Those players are stupid. You still need to win...if you "throw" the match after you get your kill and assist but you lose, you FAIL the challenge.

Fundamental logic disconnect right there.

+1 for common sense