25 replies to this topic

[verybad]

Legging hasn't been a true balance issue since MW3. If you properly armored your mechs legs in MW4 it was fine. It was an option to kill a mech, but not easier than others.

People that declare it to be dishonorable are people you need to leg all the time. They're tools.

[Mechwarrior Buddah]

bLitzLRC, on 26 June 2012 - 07:20 PM, said:

Remember in MW4 when clans would remove all armor from their legs and insist you don't shoot at their legs or be thrown off the server? I used to run a long range sniper and occasionally hit a leg and one shot would take it out - banned! Personally I am going for CT but if you have no leg armor, you're gonna be screwed.

Look at the Q&A they say its viable.

However, heres a question; say they made legging impossible, made legs invulnerable. Whats next? The head? The arms? The back?

[MuffinTop]

bLitzLRC, on 26 June 2012 - 07:20 PM, said:

Remember in MW4 when clans would remove all armor from their legs and insist you don't shoot at their legs or be thrown off the server? I used to run a long range sniper and occasionally hit a leg and one shot would take it out - banned! Personally I am going for CT but if you have no leg armor, you're gonna be screwed.

Thats as stupid as the crouch only and iron sights servers on Call of Duty, which of course they call themselves REALISIM servers. What kind of logic, or thought process do these people have to make rules like that? As far as I'm concerned legging is part of the game, and it should be allowed.

[Mortichi]

i will leg someone if its just standing there. move and shoot. be still, be dead.

[Wiley Coyote]

Legs, arms, head, torso - all viable targets. When necessary I will target the legs of a mech, it's a legitimate strategy.

[JessterC]

OMG... you legging jerks... *move ALL the armor to my leggs* ... *complain about torso shots* >.<