

We Need To Pick A Side
#1
Posted 23 December 2014 - 04:22 PM
#2
Posted 23 December 2014 - 04:27 PM
The Allting and FRR TS Hub are your go-to sources for information, in both terms of how to coordinate and where our friends/enemies are, and what we're attacking or defending. We welcome all input, but this kind of banter is serving to divide our attention, not bring it together.
#3
Posted 23 December 2014 - 04:32 PM
And we stand against Steiner, Wolf and CGB aggression. The sides are allready picked, and we should stop crying about if´s and start fighting the wars we allready have.
#4
Posted 23 December 2014 - 04:45 PM
Edited by Tabu 73, 23 December 2014 - 04:45 PM.
#5
Posted 23 December 2014 - 05:24 PM
#6
Posted 23 December 2014 - 05:48 PM
Theaus, on 23 December 2014 - 05:24 PM, said:
Thats only the answer if you accept the question. But there is no side but our own. Its way to ealry to look for a full blown alliance. Right now I agree with Tabu, NAPs are the way to go at this stage.
If, and that if is a BIG if, the NAP with Kurita should hold for a few months and does not prove to be to our disadvantage, we could maybe talk alliances, but as far as we know everybody could attack us right now.
And even if I would accept your question, I have to disagree with the possible answers you give.
Steiner is not an option for an alliance, the just made a deal that distinctly goes against the FRR.
The Draconis Combine has been true to our NAP so far and I see no reason not to continue it. But, as an full blown ally they are of little interest to us right now. They are at war with Davion and we don´t want to get involved in that too.
Similar goes for Marik and Liao, they could be an worthwhile ally against Steiner, however, they too are at war with the Davions. While Marik could be open to peace with Davion, Liao will not accept it. Plus, an alliance with one of them is less preferable than an alliance with one of our neighbours, because it would not secure any of our borders.
Your poll is not just premature, it also fails to properly adress the situation the FRR faces.
At this time all we can do diplomatically is to rely on NAPs and limited offensive and defensive coordination with the partners in our NAPs.
Edited by Klappspaten, 23 December 2014 - 05:50 PM.
#7
Posted 23 December 2014 - 06:12 PM
#8
Posted 23 December 2014 - 06:22 PM
VONDO, on 23 December 2014 - 06:12 PM, said:
You obviously didn´t pay attention. Steiner decided against an NAP with the FRR and made an NAP with Wolf, which gave Clan Wolf the opportunity to attack FRR territory. I think an alliance with Steiner is off the table.
#9
Posted 23 December 2014 - 06:28 PM
Klappspaten, on 23 December 2014 - 06:22 PM, said:
You obviously didn´t pay attention. Steiner decided against an NAP with the FRR and made an NAP with Wolf, which gave Clan Wolf the opportunity to attack FRR territory. I think an alliance with Steiner is off the table.
Fedcom only looks out for fedcom. You're either at war with it or conquered by it.
#11
Posted 23 December 2014 - 08:35 PM
#12
Posted 23 December 2014 - 11:18 PM
VONDO, on 23 December 2014 - 08:35 PM, said:
No I meant attention to whats happening in CW. With whats happening between Steiner and the FRR, at the moment there just won´t be a pact between us. They have taken direct and organized action against us, because they can´t stand the fact that our PUGs took a few planets from them they didn´t defend properly.
There was a NAP with Steiner on the table, but they not just decided against it, they also decided to negotiate a NAP with one of our Clan Enemys. The Steiners are not our friends, they are the enemy.
Edited by Klappspaten, 23 December 2014 - 11:18 PM.
#13
Posted 24 December 2014 - 03:04 AM
Neither Steiner nor FRR has the resources to fight a three front war. Especially while the clans can concentrate on a single enemy each (except the Bears, but the have enough players to attack two factions at a time).
So please kick unnecessary emotions and hurt pride aside. This is a matter of survival for both sides. Never forget: The IS is at stake

Edited by Kaeseblock, 24 December 2014 - 03:09 AM.
#14
Posted 24 December 2014 - 07:58 AM
I'll leave the politics for those who get their kicks that way. All I know is that betrayal should never be tolerated . Steiners made deals with the enemies of Inner sphere and now they are the enemy and traitors on top of that.
Of course this is only my personal view of the matter and it might not be shared by other FRR players or even other members of the unit I am in.
#15
Posted 24 December 2014 - 03:24 PM
We are not losing because of me.
Edited by Cerlin, 24 December 2014 - 03:24 PM.
#16
Posted 28 December 2014 - 05:49 PM
Cerlin, on 24 December 2014 - 03:24 PM, said:
We are not losing because of me.
I can attest to this. We've had quite a bit of success against clans when a majority of our 3rd regiment are on, and have seen some excellent pug drops in smaller groups of 3 or 4. Most of it can be attributed to using simple, yet aggressive tactics. From storming the generators to digging into the terrain in their base while slaughtering their defenders, we've proven that they can definitely be defeated through attrition or blitz. We're just having a numbers issue. Not enough putters have a winning vision. Defending Rasalhague is as good a place as any to start learning, because they won't stop with just taking out the Republic.
Edited by DaemonWulfe, 28 December 2014 - 05:50 PM.
#17
Posted 30 December 2014 - 05:31 PM
#18
Posted 30 December 2014 - 08:07 PM
#19
Posted 30 December 2014 - 10:17 PM
#20
Posted 30 December 2014 - 10:23 PM

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users