3Rd Centurion
#1
Posted 31 December 2014 - 03:40 PM
#2
Posted 31 December 2014 - 06:51 PM
#3
Posted 31 December 2014 - 06:55 PM
#4
Posted 31 December 2014 - 07:36 PM
#5
Posted 31 December 2014 - 09:31 PM
The AL is a solid medium energy boat, but it generally does not compete well with the Wolverine 6K and 7K, nor the Griffins.
The A is versatile, but does not compete well with the Wolverine 6R.
The big saving grace of the A and AL is the ability to be reasonably viable with 250 standard engines and that tanky shield arm.
#6
Posted 31 December 2014 - 09:36 PM
my YLW is 340XL Guass + LPL (or 2 MPL)
my AH is 275XL LBX10+3xSRM4 (Want to figure out LBX10+2MGs+SRMs
Edited by Bigbacon, 31 December 2014 - 09:36 PM.
#7
Posted 31 December 2014 - 11:49 PM
#9
Posted 01 January 2015 - 02:19 AM
The CN9-A has been one of my favorites since Beta. It still works as a durable SRM boat.
But why just 3 Centurions? get 5! Gotta catch'em all ;-)
#10
Posted 01 January 2015 - 04:41 PM
Escef, on 01 January 2015 - 02:05 AM, said:
No, it's not. I think you meant 300XL.
opps, correct. I confused it with the grey death i made which I have been back and forth with the 2 of them.
got the D today but I need more bills for stuff for it.
Edited by Bigbacon, 01 January 2015 - 04:42 PM.
#11
Posted 01 January 2015 - 09:24 PM
I'm wondering whether to just forget about the LL quirks and put 2 PPCs in the arm currently.
Edited by SA Baxter, 01 January 2015 - 09:25 PM.
#12
Posted 02 January 2015 - 03:26 PM
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...c24c9232a8ebc4b
does going triple LRM5 make sense at all or ever SSRMs? (I assume SSRMs are a no go as they pretty much suck)
Edited by Bigbacon, 02 January 2015 - 03:28 PM.
#13
Posted 02 January 2015 - 06:10 PM
Bigbacon, on 02 January 2015 - 03:26 PM, said:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...c24c9232a8ebc4b
does going triple LRM5 make sense at all or ever SSRMs? (I assume SSRMs are a no go as they pretty much suck)
I run something similar, though with less ammo and more armor. Also, unless you have one lying around to use, don't go for the 250XL, the 255XL is the same tonnage for slightly better performance.
#14
Posted 02 January 2015 - 08:03 PM
Bigbacon, on 02 January 2015 - 03:26 PM, said:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...c24c9232a8ebc4b
does going triple LRM5 make sense at all or ever SSRMs? (I assume SSRMs are a no go as they pretty much suck)
I use the same weapons, although dropping down to an XL 245 and getting rid of a ton of SRM ammo allows you to have 28 AC20 rounds and mostly full armor, which I find more useful. Yeah you'll occasionally run out of ammo but that's generally only after you've done obscene amounts of damage and the game's either won thanks to it, or lost regardless of it.
After some experimenting I've found that the only wortwhile centurion builds that don't use an AC20 generally need SRMs. My A variant has 3 SRM6's with artemix and 2mpl for backup and the AL will probably have 2 SRM6's with artemis and 2xLL when it's done upgrading. Cents work best for me with a big punch and neither an AC10 or 2-3xLL works for me, even with the quirks.
#15
Posted 02 January 2015 - 08:15 PM
and yea on ERLL/LL....they just over all suck for the most part unless you facing other IS mechs. I run a 4xERLL C dragon as a defense mech in CW. they are just so out performed by CERLLs and ERPPCs
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users