Jump to content

Awesome, Banshee, Commando Champs


4 replies to this topic

#1 Ted Wayz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,913 posts
  • LocationTea with Romano

Posted 03 January 2015 - 11:42 AM

Do we know which variants will be champion mechs? It would be great to know so that I could buy and start skilling them up. That way when they are released I and others could have a head start.

Thanks!

#2 Brody319

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ominous
  • The Ominous
  • 6,273 posts

Posted 03 January 2015 - 11:45 AM

I think the Awesome should be the 9M, and the banshee the 3M.

Wubshee!

Edited by Brody319, 03 January 2015 - 01:25 PM.


#3 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 03 January 2015 - 01:21 PM

Locust also needs a Champion variant. I hope it's the LCT-1M. :P

#4 Deathlike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 29,240 posts
  • Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad

Posted 03 January 2015 - 02:14 PM

View PostBrody319, on 03 January 2015 - 11:45 AM, said:

I think the Awesome should be the 9M,




If you understand the MC costs on mechs, you'll see the Cataphract-3D champion is overpriced because of the stock XL engine that is in use.that inflates the Champion's cost (they are ALWAYS 25% marked up from the MC price of the Stock build).

#5 Ted Wayz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,913 posts
  • LocationTea with Romano

Posted 03 January 2015 - 04:00 PM

Forgot about the locust. The Phoenix pack had a champ but I guess there isn't one in general release?

These are the three chassis I do not have at least 3 of. Been waiting on champs to decide which other ones I will buy for c-bills, but might as well take the plunge and hope I guess right.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users