9 replies to this topic

[pikeyNL]

is it me or where the 8v8 matches more tactical and more fun than the 12 v12 matches

i think skirmish should still be 8v8 and conquest and assault 12v12
so that you have a choice

[Gallowglas]

I feel exactly the opposite.

[Wintersdark]

Gallowglas, on 10 January 2015 - 05:48 AM, said:

I feel exactly the opposite.

Me too.

I've never regretted the move to 12v12., well, except for some River City battles at least. That map is too small for 24 players

[El Bandito]

8v8 for solo-q and 12v12 for group queue and CW. Done. Let those who worry about team work play in their 12v12, and let us puggers enjoy lower higher TTK, better FPS, and better matchmaking in 8v8.

Edited by El Bandito, 10 January 2015 - 06:35 AM.

[Wolfwood592]

El Bandito, on 10 January 2015 - 06:19 AM, said:

8v8 for solo-q and 12v12 for group queue and CW. Done. Let those who worry about team work play in their 12v12, and let us puggers enjoy lower TTK, better FPS, and better matchmaking in 8v8.

This +1

[Aiden Skye]

Should depend on the map. Maps like alpine and tourmaline can handle 12. But 12 on rivecity and other arena size maps seems like a cluster****.

[Kaspirikay]

12 v 12 on small maps almost like solaris

[spottiedogman]

I enjoyed this game much more when it was 8v8 and I would agree that some of the 1st maps were developed around this anyway, as for CW I have not played this mode as I am a Lone Wolf and they have no place for us so cannot comment on this one. I also thought match making was better with 8 v 8 then 12 v 12 but it has been so long that I may be mistaken on that one.

[Xmith]

I'm sure you all remember the 8-0 stomps as well.

12-0 stomps feels the same as 8-0 stomps. No difference what so ever.

[Burktross]

Xmith, on 10 January 2015 - 09:55 AM, said:

I'm sure you all remember the 8-0 stomps as well.

12-0 stomps feels the same as 8-0 stomps. No difference what so ever.

No...
no they don't.

That's 4 more mechs you had the chance to kill.

4 more tears on muh face.
snif