Moore
#21
Posted 12 January 2015 - 09:28 PM
#22
Posted 12 January 2015 - 09:53 PM
Edited by ThomasMarik, 12 January 2015 - 09:54 PM.
#23
Posted 12 January 2015 - 10:44 PM
#24
Posted 13 January 2015 - 01:52 AM
#26
Posted 13 January 2015 - 04:54 AM
#27
Posted 13 January 2015 - 07:35 AM
We wouldn't be able to have a second attack lane against Steiner, and we would probably have to take multiple Kuritan worlds, but if we can expand the Marik presence along that border, we might be able to shift our Steiner attack line to that part of the map (it has shifted across our long border before), and we could potentially lock off that entire side of the Kuritan border, providing them with the buffer against Steiner that the ROFLhogs have failed to achieve.
#28
Posted 13 January 2015 - 10:27 AM
Davers, on 12 January 2015 - 10:44 PM, said:
which has proven to be false. Kurita cannot attack Moore because it is the source of the attack for several cycles
will it switch to allow kurita to attack Moore? Who knows? Though the situation with ghost bear vs. kurita is they never got to attack Kurita back b/c the only planet they could attack there was generating an attack on ghost bear
Edited by Tennex, 13 January 2015 - 10:31 AM.
#29
Posted 13 January 2015 - 10:30 AM
#30
Posted 13 January 2015 - 02:08 PM
According to twitter, PGI has been working on the algorithm and chances are they will go back and correct any problems caused by that aberrant algorithm come January 20th there will be no chances for us to make any progress in that territory. Plus all our progress will be erased.
#31
Posted 13 January 2015 - 02:14 PM
Tennex, on 13 January 2015 - 02:08 PM, said:
According to twitter, PGI has been working on the algorithm and chances are they will go back and correct any problems caused by that aberrant algorithm come January 20th there will be no chances for us to make any progress in that territory. Plus all our progress will be erased.
If that's the case, then moving into Kurita (an ally), and diverting their resources should be a 3rd Tier objective after advancing the fronts we'll be likely to keep.
#32
Posted 13 January 2015 - 02:37 PM
I suspect that if any planets are going to be reset it is going to be this summer when they get out of beta and have everything more or less balanced and working. We will probably have a complete map reset.
#33
Posted 13 January 2015 - 03:30 PM
Roadbeer, on 13 January 2015 - 02:14 PM, said:
but then how will we ever know how Marik would fair against the clan front?
#34
Posted 13 January 2015 - 05:19 PM
#35
Posted 13 January 2015 - 05:32 PM
pwnface, on 13 January 2015 - 05:19 PM, said:
that would be awesome. though the algorithm is not on our side this cycle and is picking a planet that is further back...
Anyway i hope we can reach the clan boarder before PGI corrects it
#36
Posted 13 January 2015 - 05:50 PM
#37
Posted 13 January 2015 - 05:56 PM
ThomasMarik, on 13 January 2015 - 02:37 PM, said:
Well, we did grab 3 planets that cycle, and didn't lose any, so it is debatable how much we had to divert to take it.
#39
Posted 13 January 2015 - 07:11 PM
pwnface, on 13 January 2015 - 05:19 PM, said:
Clans?
I'm more interested in those smug FRR guys who run their mouths on the fourms.
Arnold J Rimmer, on 13 January 2015 - 06:23 PM, said:
Shhhh, that's supposed to be a secret!
He meant to say MP00 or Shade03 (Or, myself and Stingr4y, unofficially, in a super secret open "Hai Guise" kind of way)
Edited by Roadbeer, 13 January 2015 - 07:13 PM.
#40
Posted 13 January 2015 - 07:20 PM
pwnface, on 13 January 2015 - 05:50 PM, said:
Really going to the FWLM, since they are an amalgamation is the fastest way to disseminate info to the most active and coordinated Marik units. You can also contact the Seraphim, but we also remain tight with the FWLM so we share much information there too. I would highly recommend to any of your organized Kuritan companies to consider sending an ambassadorial request/application to the Seraphim for official consideration in future coordination efforts.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users