Jump to content

Is Part Of The Issue With The "new" Centurion Gun Arm Just How Horribly Oversized The "bi/tricep" Now Looks?


3 replies to this topic

#1 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 20 February 2015 - 04:01 PM

Obviously, there is little denying the old Centurion gun pod looked WAAAAAAAAY better than the new one.

But one thing I notice, is with the new, slimmer and smaller arm, is how grotesquely oversized the upper arm now looks. Would it at least look better with the upper arm sized more like the left arm on the mech?

Not that I expect to see anything else done to it, or that it's that high a priority...just maybe another example of the QA issues with the models. :mellow:

Edited by Bishop Steiner, 20 February 2015 - 04:02 PM.


#2 Ratpoison

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 851 posts

Posted 20 February 2015 - 04:09 PM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 20 February 2015 - 04:01 PM, said:

Obviously, there is little denying the old Centurion gun pod looked WAAAAAAAAY better than the new one.

Disagreed.

#3 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 20 February 2015 - 04:16 PM

View PosttortuousGoddess, on 20 February 2015 - 04:09 PM, said:

Disagreed.

I can get you a great groupon for lazik..... ;)

#4 Risko Vinsheen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 573 posts

Posted 20 February 2015 - 04:17 PM

I think it would look a lot better if they just gave it the Enforcer's cannon arm. The Centurion's cannon arm just looks so much like an afterthought (obviously because it is an afterthought, but doesn't mean it can't look like it wasn't.)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users