Someone Please Explain This To Me..
#1
Posted 05 April 2015 - 04:34 PM
Why is it I with over 7000 matches just in my Jenner F, my ELO is treated the exact same as a Panther 10k which I have never touched in my life and is not even basiced out?
#2
Posted 05 April 2015 - 04:37 PM
Simples
#3
Posted 05 April 2015 - 04:37 PM
Edit: haha beat me to it
Edited by DeamoBD, 05 April 2015 - 04:38 PM.
#4
Posted 05 April 2015 - 04:38 PM
#6
Posted 05 April 2015 - 05:06 PM
Darian DelFord, on 05 April 2015 - 04:46 PM, said:
Exactly my point, how difficult would you think that is? And more importantly
Do you think it is needed?
Yes. Not only by chassis, but by variants. Cause there is a big Elo difference between my STK-5M and STK-3H.
Edited by El Bandito, 06 April 2015 - 04:34 AM.
#7
Posted 05 April 2015 - 05:11 PM
#8
Posted 05 April 2015 - 05:14 PM
#9
Posted 05 April 2015 - 05:19 PM
Not that the current system does a great job of course, but this would make it even more silly.
Edited by Zoid, 05 April 2015 - 05:20 PM.
#10
Posted 05 April 2015 - 08:16 PM
QuantumButler, on 05 April 2015 - 05:11 PM, said:
Incorrect. Elo works fine, it's the matchmaker that's not working correctly. Elo ratings are just one input into the matchmaker.
A layered approach to Elo would be much better than what we have and should not require massive changes to implement. We should have an overall Elo rating, plus ratings for each weight class, each chassis, and each variant. Once you have 50 matches in Lights, you'd use the Light Weight Class Elo rating instead of the overall rating. Once you have 50 matches in Jenners, you'd use the Jenner Chassis Elo rating instead of the Light Weight Class Elo rating. Etc.
Only the most specific (i.e. variant) should be used for matchmaking purposes, but all of them should be adjusted after each match.
Then when you buy a brand new Mech, you'd have a more appropriate Elo rating to use for it until you had 50 matches. It makes no sense to buy a brand new Stalker variant and have it use an Elo rating that you partially earned piloting Awesomes. It should use your Stalker Chassis Elo rating, which will be far more accurate. Then once you have 50 matches in the new Stalker, it would start using its own rating so that it could separate from your 5M and 3H ratings.
Really pretty simple.
#11
Posted 05 April 2015 - 08:49 PM
#12
Posted 05 April 2015 - 09:03 PM
#13
Posted 05 April 2015 - 09:04 PM
Match maker could find 2 perfectly balanced teams. One of those teams either by someone choosing to use VOIP, or a few mechs getting caught out, or by sheer blind luck, will find themselves in a stronger position.
Once that team has taken advantage of their stronger position it very quickly becomes a 12 - 4 win for them.
Then of course everyone cries MATCHMAKER IS BROKEN!! When it's simply the flow of battle which has decided the game.
Even the pro competitive matches where all mechs are meta and all players are equal skill (as close as anyway) sometimes end 12 - 4. You gonna try and blame MM for that?
Matchmaker is fine. And MWO has to be the hardest game in the universe to calculate ELO for.
#14
Posted 06 April 2015 - 12:09 AM
#15
Posted 06 April 2015 - 02:42 AM
So stop worrying about it.
#16
Posted 06 April 2015 - 03:35 AM
#17
Posted 06 April 2015 - 04:43 AM
El Bandito, on 05 April 2015 - 05:06 PM, said:
Yes. Not only by chassis, but by variants. Cause there is a big Elo difference between my STK-5M and STK-3H.
If they differentiated Tiers by variant, then they need to differentiate ELO by variant. What they ought to do is not calculate ELO by weight, chassis, or variant. They should calculate it by what performance tier the mech falls into.....
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users























