42 replies to this topic

[xeromynd]

Are you serious?

5x C-ERLLS?
Quad C-LPL?
Dual C-Gauss?
CUAC20 + 3 CML + 3 CSRM4 ?

[DEFENDERlOR]

I think it will be good with small armor buff for example 12 center or 6 right torso,6 left torso additional armor.

Edited by DEFENDERlOR, 06 April 2015 - 02:16 PM.

[LordKnightFandragon]

DEFENDERlOR, on 06 April 2015 - 12:26 PM, said:

İ think it will be good with small armor buff for example 12 center or 6 right torso,6 left torso additional armor.

Lol, Warhawk could use Zeus treatment, +17 L/R/C Torso.....the Zeus has flat, small torsos and it got +17......

Warhawk torsos are huge, boxy and can be hit from all sides. It should defs get atleast Zeus +17...lol.

[Revis Volek]

xeromynd, on 06 April 2015 - 12:13 PM, said:

Are you serious?

5x C-ERLLS?
Quad C-LPL?
Dual C-Gauss?
CUAC20 + 3 CML + 3 CSRM4 ?

He started this thread just to tell us he had a good game in his Blackjack.

XXXBunnyXXX, on 06 April 2015 - 10:41 AM, said:

by pop u mean make easy 800+ dmg

[Mcgral18]

DarthRevis, on 06 April 2015 - 12:58 PM, said:

He started this thread just to tell us he had a good game in his Blackjack.

Good?

[TercieI]

Metus regem, on 06 April 2015 - 10:57 AM, said:

The word for that is, utility, and it is with out a doubt a good thing.

Actually, utility is pretty much "good at nothing" and thus "bad" in this game.

[Gas Guzzler]

I heard a guy say he would take a Gargoyle over a Warhawk once. You guys know him too.

In all honesty, I never thought the Warhawk was bad, but Dires are more fun. The Executioner will probably be a good blend of each, with HoverJets

[Weeny Machine]

Darian DelFord, on 06 April 2015 - 09:50 AM, said:

4 C-LPL with Heatsinks and Mods

Nuff said

Oh man, how I hate this build when I play a light mech and that one shows up

[DjPush]

TheCobra, on 06 April 2015 - 09:38 AM, said:

It is a very viable mech. If you think that is bad, try the Gargles.

Don't you talk ill of my Gargoyles!!

[Summon3r]

4 LPL may sound like a lack of weps for an assault but it wrecks face.... little help on the ST strength and it would be far more viable

[FerrolupisXIII]

im a fan of the 4-LPL build myself. its really a lot of fun. the big problem is it doesn't have hard point spam, and all those locked heat sinks make life a little rough on ammo dependent builds. pretty much it's just Not-A-Dire-Wolf Syndrome. the Dire is just so much better at (nearly) every build that its silly to bring a Warhawk unless you have a very specific reason for it.

its still arguably better than many IS assaults, and the Garg though.

[Metus regem]

Terciel1976, on 06 April 2015 - 01:21 PM, said:

Actually, utility is pretty much "good at nothing" and thus "bad" in this game.

Bad just means that you don't know how to use that mech. I've taken 'bad' mechs, and beaten meta units... sometimes you need to be able to think outside of the accepted box to use a mech right.

[Fuggles]

its a good mech, I prefer it as far as fun to play factor compared to the direwolf. if it got some ST perks, it would be amazing.

[Malcolm Vordermark]

I would like to see it get a few more hard points. Maybe a left arm with 3 energy and a right torso with a ballistic (both supported by future omnipods). But what it really needs is an armor/structure quirk for its side torso.

[Fate 6]

DarthRevis, on 06 April 2015 - 09:45 AM, said:

Actually I was rolling it last night in my WHK-Prime(I)...

2xERPPC
2xLRM15
3xSML PULSE LASERS

Your anecdotal evidence only shows us that you are against brain dead opponents.

xeromynd, on 06 April 2015 - 12:13 PM, said:

Are you serious?

5x C-ERLLS?
Quad C-LPL?
Dual C-Gauss?
CUAC20 + 3 CML + 3 CSRM4 ?

Situation
Fine
Nope
lolno

[Chuanhao]

I bought the warhawk ala carte to get the prime with cbill bonus. I run it two ways.

1) shifting out the LRM for more heat sinks.

2) removing the LRM and Tgt Comp for 2x SRM6 with a different right torso

I play it as a mobile hard hitting direct fire support mech with the standard 4 ERPPC in chain fire. It has been very effective.

Am also able to mount up to LRM 70 on the B variant as a mobile indirect fire support mode. Quite effective.

with the new PPC quirks and putting in a weapon module, that makes for nearly 20% faster firing rate, as long as the heat sinks hold up (8% heat gen, 12% cooldown, 15% velocity)

Edited by Chuanhao, 06 April 2015 - 04:36 PM.

[Yokaiko]

Chuanhao, on 06 April 2015 - 04:32 PM, said:

I bought the warhawk ala carte to get the prime with cbill bonus. I run it two ways.

1) shifting out the LRM for more heat sinks.

2) removing the LRM and Tgt Comp for 2x SRM6 with a different right torso

I play it as a mobile hard hitting direct fire support mech with the standard 4 ERPPC in chain fire. It has been very effective.

Am also able to mount up to LRM 70 on the B variant as a mobile indirect fire support mode. Quite effective.

with the new PPC quirks and putting in a weapon module, that makes for nearly 20% faster firing rate, as long as the heat sinks hold up (8% heat gen, 12% cooldown, 15% velocity)

....you understand that it runs even hotter after that right?

[Fate 6]

The Warhawk is indeed a bad mech.

However, keep in mind that the OP is also a known troll and this is his 3rd account.

[Sorbic]

The WH is plenty strong and is getting stronger tomorrow.

[Deathlike]

Gas Guzzler, on 06 April 2015 - 01:21 PM, said:

I heard a guy say he would take a Gargoyle over a Warhawk once. You guys know him too.

Guilty as charged.

Although now, I'd have to rethink that with the quirks.