in terms of AA is FXAA better then just standard postAA? MSAA crushes my fps and my card doesnt do TXAA apparently.
what does it do?


Fxaa Question
Started by Summon3r, Apr 07 2015 06:19 PM
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 07 April 2015 - 06:19 PM
#2
Posted 08 April 2015 - 12:53 AM
FXAA is a post-process antialiasing method that attempts to make the image less aliased through some kind of filtering that many people criticize for making things blurry. It's fast and not very performance intensive, and can give you a decent result. What the other postAA in MWO is, dunno. Try it out, see if you like it, I guess.
TXAA is an nVidia specific tech.
TXAA is an nVidia specific tech.
Edited by POWR, 08 April 2015 - 12:54 AM.
#3
Posted 08 April 2015 - 01:29 AM
Sorry for a slight off-topic, but every time people discuss anti-alias i bless my 5 dioptres of myopia. In-built AA.
What POWR said, FXAA will give you decent result at not much computing expense, but if you have good eyesight you will notice the blurriness.
What POWR said, FXAA will give you decent result at not much computing expense, but if you have good eyesight you will notice the blurriness.
Edited by gloowa, 08 April 2015 - 01:31 AM.
#4
Posted 08 April 2015 - 03:31 AM
As MWO uses CryEngine3 maybe the following link is interesting (at least for comparision of the different AA types)
Antialiasing Modes
Antialiasing Modes
#5
Posted 08 April 2015 - 08:27 AM
The PostAA looks far better than FXAA - therefore I'm using this.
I also dont use the MSAA, because the implementation is catastrophic. It slashes FPS into half.
Normally I have 100 - 120 frames per second, which is fluently. Activating MSAA cuts this down to 50 FPS, which is far to slow for me and I dont wont to play this way. Even activating 4K resolution via Nvidia DSR has more FPS than Full HD with MSAA.
Therefore I think MSAA needs a little bit of fine tuning.
I also dont use the MSAA, because the implementation is catastrophic. It slashes FPS into half.
Normally I have 100 - 120 frames per second, which is fluently. Activating MSAA cuts this down to 50 FPS, which is far to slow for me and I dont wont to play this way. Even activating 4K resolution via Nvidia DSR has more FPS than Full HD with MSAA.
Therefore I think MSAA needs a little bit of fine tuning.
#6
Posted 08 April 2015 - 09:32 AM
I hear ya on the MSAA fps loss..
Gotta say though, paired with some tweaks from the AMD Control Centre... it looks damn good
Gotta say though, paired with some tweaks from the AMD Control Centre... it looks damn good

#7
Posted 08 April 2015 - 10:25 AM
IIRC, FXAA is NVidia only, but it's less detrimental to performance than many AA, but obviously for being "efficient", you will get some side effects like font blurring.
http://en.wikipedia....e_anti-aliasing
http://en.wikipedia....e_anti-aliasing
#8
Posted 08 April 2015 - 12:47 PM
I'd say that FXAA is a bid better than PostAA in MWO.
TXAA should be a fair deal between performance and eyecandy, but in MWO it is like MSAA -> totallywrecking your FPS.
I hope that they will tune SLI in future so i can turn it on - at the moment one has less FPS with SLI/Crossfire than without
TXAA should be a fair deal between performance and eyecandy, but in MWO it is like MSAA -> totallywrecking your FPS.
I hope that they will tune SLI in future so i can turn it on - at the moment one has less FPS with SLI/Crossfire than without

#10
Posted 08 April 2015 - 11:24 PM
i tried the different modes and the winner for me is PostAA......
MSAA and TXAA cut down FPS in half and FXAA doesnt look as good as PostAA (despite i have a nVidia card)
MSAA and TXAA cut down FPS in half and FXAA doesnt look as good as PostAA (despite i have a nVidia card)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users