389 replies to this topic

[Damion Sparhawk]

Skadi, on 02 July 2012 - 06:21 PM, said:

In the blood of heretics

hmm, given the comic I'd think it'd be under a spray of bullets, but okay. (this marine is unclean... PURIFY HIM!)

[Skadi]

Damion Sparhawk, on 02 July 2012 - 06:23 PM, said:

hmm, given the comic I'd think it'd be under a spray of bullets, but okay. (this marine is unclean... PURIFY HIM!)

[Ashla Mason]

Whatever point the OP had was lost under the weight of his pretentious doushebaggery.

[William Petersen]

Ashla Mason, on 02 July 2012 - 06:29 PM, said:

Whatever point the OP had was lost under the weight of his pretentious doushebaggery.

He didn't have one, just a bunch of conflicting platitudes and meaningless comparisons to other games.

[Otto Cannon]

Damion Sparhawk, on 02 July 2012 - 06:23 PM, said:

hmm, given the comic I'd think it'd be under a spray of bullets, but okay. (this marine is unclean... PURIFY HIM!)

They just get the battle nuns to flame them while they punch themselves in the face screaming 'FOR THE EMPEROR!'

[Cur]

I call BS on the guy being a "professional" gamer.


A real professional gamer would not waste their time writing a book based purely on speculation.

They would wait untill details on how the free to play mechanics are released in detail, or wait untill they can actualy play the game, before writing a book in a half about how they're worried about **** that's in another game, thats completely irrelivant to this game.

[Skadi]

atleast not anymore.

[Otto Cannon]

William Petersen, on 02 July 2012 - 06:31 PM, said:

He didn't have one, just a bunch of conflicting platitudes and meaningless comparisons to other games.

I think he's used to having some status in the WoW community, so he got massively butthurt when nobody cares what he thinks because here he's the clueless noob.

'Gaah! You kiddies should respect mah authoritah!'

[Aramusha]

18 pages and counting.

If his intent was to solicit a response from this community...well he just won at the internetz.

[Droid on Roids]

Mongooser, on 02 July 2012 - 01:40 AM, said:

I was the first player in WOT to cap out all the vehicles in the game.

Might wanna check that claim with WoT Player SeaTank. I believe he is widely accepted as the first player to top all branches of all nations.
All elited too, not just critical pathed

[Skadi]

Droid on Roids, on 02 July 2012 - 06:58 PM, said:

Might wanna check that claim with WoT Player SeaTank. I believe he is widely accepted as the first player to top all branches of all nations.
All elited too, not just critical pathed

My names skadi (who cares) And this post is absoulte win.

[william kane]

You KNOW when people learn to write by reading forums on the INTERNETS when they INTERSPERSE caps in their drivel to emphasize SOMETHING.

So annoying, and hard to take seriously.

OP may be a dbag troll, but it's been entertaining to read the responses.

[Droid on Roids]

Droid on Roids, on 02 July 2012 - 06:58 PM, said:

Might wanna check that claim with WoT Player SeaTank. I believe he is widely accepted as the first player to top all branches of all nations.
All elited too, not just critical pathed

Seems this bloke's not even the 'Top Tanker' in his Clan for vehicles researched
http://wot-stats.app...on-1#!top-tanks

I don't mind people putting forward their opinions .. hell it's why I read these forums.. and personally, i believe OP's got some valid points & his motivation seems honest enough.

But there's no need to try & amplify your argument / suggestions by bullcrapping about how great you are.
As far as I can see it, we're all just at differing levels of ignorance as to the final make-up / appearance of the game anyway.

Let's not thump him down for the content of his post too much though.

DoR out

[CptBob]

ummm, a professional gamer and didn't hear about MWO till a few days ago???? I am in no way close to a professional gamer and I got wind of MWO heaps ago. dude is there anyway you can back up your claims? if so we all might listen to your dribble...

[Skadi]

Giuz, i went 100 and 1 in Call of Duty, i iz pro gamer now?

Edited by Skadi, 02 July 2012 - 07:26 PM.

[Skyefox]

Skadi, on 02 July 2012 - 07:24 PM, said:

Giuz, i went 100 and 1 in Call of Duty, i iz pro gamer.

LOL

Really though, I'm very good at CoD and was in top 100 for wins and Search & Destroy until they updated it and made it unplayable.

He may get paid to play a video game, but as a tester or troubleshooter. He's not entering tourneys, he's not doing any ladders, he's not even doing WoW arena matches. I don't understand.

[Papertarget]

Mongooser, on 02 July 2012 - 03:26 PM, said:

1. I did play MW games in the past and know the colors of the lasers, did not know the devs decided on not allowing players to change the colors, it was a suggestion.

2. I DID NOT say MWO was going to have tiers, however it does. LIght, Medium, Heavy, Asaault = 4 tiers.

3. I never said MWO cannot work, where did you get this from?

4. Think it is strange you say I am a wallet warrior I had ONE premium tank

1) To be honest, the main point that seems to be pointed out about the prior MW titles from what I read, and how they are like MW:O, is that they are only going to remotely resemble each other. (There is a reason why "This isn't your Grandpa's Mechwarrior" is coined here.)

2) I think when you are trying to point out how similar WoT and MWO are, people equate that with fail, because WoT is a morass of problems and people that try not to keep their eyes closed, see the general direction WoT is going, and to sugest that MWO should follow it, means you don't want it to succeed.

3)The different weight classes in no way equate to "Tiers". a light isn't inferior to a medium to a heavy to an assault. Tiers indicate that you are speaking of a progression. A light is a viable mech because it's job is not to go and stand up to a heavy or an assault. It's job is to scout. If you are taking a light mech against an assault mech, then you are not playing to the strength of the mech. You aren't even playing MWO, but some form of weird WoT hybrid.

4) I have played WoT, and early on, I purchased a Lowe. I did this so I could be competitive in the game, and see what a heavy tank would do. I ended up selling it because I realized that it was basically an ***** move for myself. I started then understanding the real problems with Pay to Win from that experience. And when the Type-59 came out, I just couldn't see myself trying to enjoy a game that rewarded people to pay for an advantage in the game beyond what a premium account would get you.

MWO is not a WoT clone. They do not want an "endgame" scenario, because it would be a completion of the game, and would then make someone look for the next big thing. Being the biggest, doesn't mean being the baddest here. Instead, being the team player will mean being part of the pest. Being a loner will only get you in someones kill marker, and a mech kill pained on the side.

I understand the desire to ask questions, and even to make suggestions. All people do it. But there is a certain etiquette that is expected by those that have been in the gaming forums of not only this game, but the majority. That is that it is best to first do a basic search, and find out about the game before making the suggestions. Questions may get you a little ribbing, or points towards the appropriate area or thread. That you instead chose to not even make an effort to find out more information, and then place yourself as an "expert" on games, isn't in any way appropriate. Most here are showing anger not because of your suggestions, or even your questions. They are showing it because your assumption of expertise is based upon being a paid employee of a couple games or so.

I personally don't really care. I will always look at the suggestions and the questions, but if they are not from someone that has even tried to do any search on it, I largely discount them. You want us to make an effort, or the dev's to make the effort, but you are not willing to make any effort. You actually stated the question of "why should I do an in depth search on the game". My reverse question is this. For someone that gets paid to "play" a game, why wouldn't you? I would expect someone that had to "play" a game, would rather make sure that a game they would play for leisure and fun would actually not be close to the game they were being paid to play in. Having it as a job means it is no longer just something you do by choice, which means it becomes a job.

[Skadi]

Skyefox, on 02 July 2012 - 07:28 PM, said:

LOL

Really though, I'm very good at CoD and was in top 100 for wins and Search & Destroy until they updated it and made it unplayable.

He may get paid to play a video game, but as a tester or troubleshooter. He's not entering tourneys, he's not doing any ladders, he's not even doing WoW arena matches. I don't understand.

i didnt bother to armory him, i wouldnt call anyone pro that plays wow pve, atm the latest raid is easier on heroic setting than the previous raid teir on heroic...
Also im good at CoD, but im not good enough to enter a tourney, i know there are people out there that are outrageous (And yes i actualy have gone 100 and 1 , MW2 was actualy decent.)

Edited by Skadi, 02 July 2012 - 07:30 PM.

[Skyefox]

Skadi, on 02 July 2012 - 07:29 PM, said:

i didnt bother to armory him, i wouldnt call anyone pro that plays wow pve, atm the latest raid is easier on heroic setting than the previous raid teir on heroic...
Also im good at CoD, but im not good enough to enter a tourney, i know there are people out there that are outrageous (And yes i actualy have gone 100 and 1 , MW2 was actualy decent.)

Killstreak I miss the most: The harrier. God that thing was guaranteed for at LEAST a Chopper Gunner, and it shot down other VTOL killstreaks.

[MuffinTop]

He just made another thread," Should the pro gamer get a founders account?"LMAO the hits just keep coming from this guy. He also tells you how to vote, dependant on the criteria for yes and no.

Edited by MuffinTop, 02 July 2012 - 07:41 PM.