How's This Build?
#1
Posted 14 April 2015 - 07:51 PM
It's been awhile since I've played, and I'm getting ready to jump back into this game.
A have a build though, and I'm not sure if it's good or not.
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...4616caec35e484a
So... is it bad, good, or in the middle?
#2
Posted 14 April 2015 - 08:04 PM
But aside from the nitpicking, I can see somebody being very successful with this build. It's not an LRM boat, but it can provide light LRM support, while still having most of its tonnage dedicated to being a front line assault. Plus, you can use that exact same engine in the fully optimised build if you ever want to try it.
Go for it, I think it'll work fine.
Edited by Tarogato, 14 April 2015 - 08:05 PM.
#3
Posted 14 April 2015 - 08:11 PM
Also, the armor stripping is poorly chosen. You want to max armor on every important section. The lack of heat efficiency is pretty crippling, too. Unless your build is very fast and agile, you generally get more damage out of heat efficiency than you do more alpha, especially when the heat load gets pushed into one- or two-volley overheat territory.
Personally, I'd do something like the following:
BNC-3S
You get 6 MLs (max without a ghost heat penalty) and an AC20 with max armor except on the shield arm (twist to get that empty arm in the way of incoming fire between shots), with a LL on the other arm for longer ranged tagging (single hardpoint arms need a big gun to really be worth it).
You lose some speed and your indirect fire capability, but pick up heat efficiency and direct firepower, as well as survivability.
Personally, I'd go with more DHS and a LL rather than ES, a bigger engine, and a single PPC, even with the quirks, which are terrible for using PPCs anyway.
#4
Posted 14 April 2015 - 08:23 PM
Edited by Modo44, 14 April 2015 - 08:23 PM.
#5
Posted 14 April 2015 - 08:30 PM
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...409bfaf21baec6c
large lasors instead of lrm/ppc for easy sniping on the long distances, supported by ml on the closer distances and also ac20 since you want it, almost full armor except some armor was stripped from the empty hand
may be a bit hot, so you may want to lose 1-2 ml/some right arm armor for heat sink(s), it needs testing with a heat simulator which im too lazy to do :3
Edited by bad arcade kitty, 14 April 2015 - 08:50 PM.
#6
Posted 14 April 2015 - 08:35 PM
My biggest suggestion would be to remove a med laser and use that tonnage saved for more armor. It might even be more beneficial to even reduce the LRM15 to an LRM10 and try to change some of the Med lasers into MPLs. Same heat, slightly shorter range, better damage and better beam duration.
Without knowing your skills overall, I can't suggest too much else. Without knowing the mech itself and taking this design for a spin, I also can't help much more with that either. On paper, it looks like a decent start, depending upon what you are looking for.
Something I'd be more tempted to try running first. I tried to keep with your original design purpose, but...
I changed the LRM15 to an LRM10. It's not a focus, and I find a 10 can be meaningful enough. (up to preference).
From there, I moved your LRM ammo from your CT (a place that will get shot a lot) and into your legs. From there, I moved some AC20 ammo into your right torso with the AC20. (The AC20 should crit pad your ammo well enough I think.)
Then I took out all the med lasers. I placed a LPL into the CT for zombie abilities. I also paired this up with a set of MPLs, one in the head and one in the side torso. Between the CT LPL and head MPL, you could be a walking CT and still be able to deal decent damage. (If you are placing a Std engine, might as well try to make a build that can zombie.)
With the rest of the weight saved, I shifted armor around and added some extra armor. Beefed out the legs some more mostly. Try not to place ammo into your legs that you stripped of armor. It's asking for trouble.
With the weapons, sometimes less is more. It should help your heat management, and you can still deal a lot of damage depending upon how you use the mech.
(I'd like to note, I have not tested this design. It's all theory on paper.)
My suggestion if you play this mech (your original concept or mine), don't treat that LRM launcher like it's a main weapon. It isn't. Don't sit back and LRM till you run out of ammo. Use it while you are on the move and trying to get your other weapons to bear on a target. Also don't forget to twist when people are shooting you. If you can soak some damage in those arms, all the better.
A final suggestion, you can also always downgrade your engine for more tonnage to add into weapons. You don't need the max sized engine on an assault. A 325 or even 300 should be fast enough for a decent assault. This is up for preference, but don't be afraid to consider moving a little slower.
#7
Posted 14 April 2015 - 08:40 PM
My Battlemaster 1G is set up in a fairly similar manner. Maybe you can find inspiration from this? This build has worked very well for me so far.
#8
Posted 15 April 2015 - 05:04 AM
If you wanted to do short range on that mech, I'd do something like this: http://mwo.smurfy-ne...0dd1978513ceb3c
If you wanted to do long range on that mech, I'd do something like this: http://mwo.smurfy-ne...d3fdc22e25f3833
If you wanted to do mid range on that mech, I'd do something like this: http://mwo.smurfy-ne...cc09c3a25189a15
The idea is that you build around the range you want to fight at, then find ways to put yourself in that range without exposing yourself to enemy fire. I will say that in pub games, it's typically much more difficult to get a short range mech into it's optimal range. If you manage to do it, you can wreck, but sometimes you just end up hung out to dry.
#9
Posted 15 April 2015 - 07:40 AM
Banditman, on 15 April 2015 - 05:04 AM, said:
I do see your point, but I'd just like to remark here that I've had very good results in mixed range mechs. Sometimes, it's about finding that balancing point for yourself. Then again, there are a lot of merits to doing a more focused mech as well. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. If a mix design can force a focused design out of it's strengths, it wins. If a focused design can stay within it's focus against a mixed design, well... The focused design wins.
This depends upon the pilot, their play style, and what they want to do with their mech. Each has it's merits. Each has it's weaknesses.
#10
Posted 15 April 2015 - 01:27 PM
I will test them all and see how they work for me.
#11
Posted 15 April 2015 - 05:33 PM
Matoi Ryuko, on 15 April 2015 - 01:27 PM, said:
I will test them all and see how they work for me.
Don't feel compelled to try all of them... Just whatever ones seem to interest you. (Because there are a lot of builds posted here already...)
#12
Posted 16 April 2015 - 03:52 PM
#13
Posted 17 April 2015 - 11:51 AM
#14
Posted 17 April 2015 - 12:02 PM
This one is still a little on the warm side but will be much friendlier for you!
Edited by Voivode, 17 April 2015 - 12:02 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users