What Mechs Do You Think Need Some Hitbox Love?
#1
Posted 19 April 2015 - 12:32 PM
1. Warhawk
2. Gargoyle
3. Awesome
#2
Posted 19 April 2015 - 12:34 PM
2. Jenner
3. Jenner
4. Catapult
5. Dragon
Edited by Juodas Varnas, 19 April 2015 - 12:35 PM.
#3
Posted 19 April 2015 - 01:01 PM
#4
Posted 19 April 2015 - 02:22 PM
Jenner
Awesome
Quickdraw
Orion
Thunderbolt
Catapult
Kintaro
Cataphract
Nova
Battlemaster
I'm sure there are more
#5
Posted 19 April 2015 - 02:42 PM
Edited by Ragnar Darkmane, 19 April 2015 - 02:52 PM.
#6
Posted 19 April 2015 - 02:52 PM
#7
Posted 19 April 2015 - 02:59 PM
#8
Posted 19 April 2015 - 03:03 PM
Also the catapult. my WHK C smashed so quickly trough a pair of them, even a shadowhawk can last longer...
#9
Posted 19 April 2015 - 03:03 PM
#10
Posted 19 April 2015 - 03:17 PM
#11
Posted 19 April 2015 - 03:18 PM
1) Jenner - nothing but legs and a center torso
2) Awesome - a bit too big, and easy to hit
3) Catapult - stupidly huge and easy to disarm and hit
#12
Posted 19 April 2015 - 03:30 PM
- Cicada
- Cicada
- Cicada
#13
Posted 19 April 2015 - 04:18 PM
Jenner
Raven
The Warhawk is far far too fragile for an 85 ton mech; they go down like 65 tonners. It's the same size as the Direwolf, but with much less armor, and the CT being so small means that the sides go very quickly.
The Jenner is known for being all CT; this wasn't so bad when it was undisputed king of the lights in every other way, but these days, the Firestarter with its balanced hitboxes just outclasses the venerable JR7.
The Raven's leg hitboxes were increased to be ~2.5x the size of the model back in beta because the torso was unhittable with the poor netcode back then. Well, the netcode has gotten better, but the Raven still has huge legs that are impossible to miss.
I would include the Nova on this list because of how fragile it is, but honestly the hitboxes are reasonably well balanced. The thing is just so huge and slow though, it breaks like glass as soon as someone glances at it. It needs a lot more than just hitbox adjustments.
Armorine, on 19 April 2015 - 03:17 PM, said:
I think you're confused; they do hitbox passes every now and then. There was a big push last year where they split the pelvis of most mechs to be part of each leg and a bit of CT rather than all CT like it used to be. The Awesome has also gotten a hitbox adjustment specifically, and while the CT is still too big, it's a better balance between CT and sides.
#14
Posted 19 April 2015 - 04:20 PM
aniviron, on 19 April 2015 - 04:18 PM, said:
Jenner
Raven
The Warhawk is far far too fragile for an 85 ton mech; they go down like 65 tonners. It's the same size as the Direwolf, but with much less armor, and the CT being so small means that the sides go very quickly.
The Jenner is known for being all CT; this wasn't so bad when it was undisputed king of the lights in every other way, but these days, the Firestarter with its balanced hitboxes just outclasses the venerable JR7.
The Raven's leg hitboxes were increased to be ~2.5x the size of the model back in beta because the torso was unhittable with the poor netcode back then. Well, the netcode has gotten better, but the Raven still has huge legs that are impossible to miss.
I would include the Nova on this list because of how fragile it is, but honestly the hitboxes are reasonably well balanced. The thing is just so huge and slow though, it breaks like glass as soon as someone glances at it. It needs a lot more than just hitbox adjustments.
I think you're confused; they do hitbox passes every now and then. There was a big push last year where they split the pelvis of most mechs to be part of each leg and a bit of CT rather than all CT like it used to be. The Awesome has also gotten a hitbox adjustment specifically, and while the CT is still too big, it's a better balance between CT and sides.
Maybe. I was saying in regards to shrinking the hit boxes. Splitting them is easy I'm sure
#15
Posted 19 April 2015 - 04:31 PM
Jazzbandit1313, on 19 April 2015 - 12:32 PM, said:
1. Warhawk
2. Gargoyle
3. Awesome
Id go with this one. Atleast the WHK and AWS.
Ofc, the AWS and WHK need a new, little thinner model....not much they can do to make the hitboxes better when the mech itself is a barn door...
#16
Posted 19 April 2015 - 05:16 PM
WM Quicksilver, on 19 April 2015 - 03:30 PM, said:
- Cicada
- Cicada
- Cicada
Actually, I've never really had much trouble with the Cicada.
As mentioned above, the Jenner is in dire need of slightly bigger side torsos
Edited by Troutmonkey, 19 April 2015 - 05:17 PM.
#17
Posted 19 April 2015 - 05:21 PM
Adamski, on 19 April 2015 - 02:22 PM, said:
Jenner
Awesome
Quickdraw
Orion
Thunderbolt
Catapult
Kintaro
Cataphract
Nova
Battlemaster
I'm sure there are more
I'd add the (B)Adder to that list, as it also has some CT issues (but not nearly as bad as the Jenner).
#18
Posted 19 April 2015 - 05:24 PM
Mad Dog
Firestarter
Catapult
Firestarter
Jenner
FIRESTARTER
#19
Posted 19 April 2015 - 05:56 PM
Jenner
Warhawk
#20
Posted 19 April 2015 - 08:24 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users