Jump to content

Pgi - What Gives With Clan Lower Arm Actuators


23 replies to this topic

#21 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 21 April 2015 - 08:22 PM

View PostMoenrg, on 21 April 2015 - 07:57 PM, said:

That's exactly what it's about. If I want to put 2 medium pulse lasers in each of my warhawk prime's arms, then I should be able to equip lower arm actuators, but MWO doesn't let me. Also according to the patch notes, the gargoyle C should be able to put lower arm actuators in it's right arm, yet both Li Song and Smurfy show this as not allowed (even if installing 6xER smalls), I'm downloading the patch atm, so I wonder what it will be (I suspect Smurfy is probably right). This alone will stop me from buying that mech, so PGI might want to rethink it's stance on lower arm actuators (i.e. always allow them if NOT using PPC's, Gauss, or Ballistics (and really it should only be large ballistics, UAC 2's and 5's shouldn't impact this, but such is this game....)).


And I agree entirely with that stance. For a 'Mech with so much of its firepower in the arms, it needs the lower actuators.

#22 Kalthios

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 374 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire

Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:39 PM

On my Mad Dog I can put 3 LPLs and a couple tons of ammo and still have a lower arm actuator, total weight of 20 tons. That's almost twice as heavy as a gauss rifle.

Its not like arm-mounted ballistics are OP, (big convergence issues, i.e. Black Widow) or that it makes sense technically.

I'm forced to use lasers if I want arm actuators but I find projectiles to be more fun, especially on the arms.

if we have the slots for the actuator, let us use it please, its just fun to be a space cowboy.

#23 Navid A1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2022 Gold Champ
  • CS 2022 Gold Champ
  • 4,954 posts

Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:46 PM

PGI is not following construction rule consistently when it comes to LAA.
Its very annoying

There has been another thread on this... PGI just don't care!
LAA on direwolf won't bring them money i guess.

#24 Saint Scarlett Johan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hearing Impaired
  • Hearing Impaired
  • 3,349 posts
  • LocationOn the Delta side of Vicksburg

Posted 11 July 2016 - 04:27 PM

View PostNavid A1, on 11 July 2016 - 03:46 PM, said:

PGI is not following construction rule consistently when it comes to LAA.
Its very annoying

There has been another thread on this... PGI just don't care!
LAA on direwolf won't bring them money i guess.


"Well, we're just too busy to edit an XML file with all the big changes coming down the pipes. We're releasing a new mechpack, wanna buy it?"





9 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users