Curiosity: [Apoc], How The Heck Did You Get Your Cataphract This Fast?
#1
Posted 23 March 2015 - 06:19 PM
[Redacted]
And the AC/20 + ML build seems both to be 1) standard engine and 2) fast as I've ever seen a Cataphract move in my life. What's the build?
#2
Posted 23 March 2015 - 06:34 PM
Yeah. Here's a build that goes 82kph.
This thread is going to get locked, and should be, as flat out name and shame as well as a named accusation of cheating.
Plus it's not just wrong but silly wrong.
Uncool, plus reported, plus you're wrong.
#3
Posted 23 March 2015 - 06:37 PM
Let me introduce you to the fastphract. You can do it on the 3D or the 1X. Take a STD 320 Engine, add an AC 20 with 4 tons of ammo and ML's to taste. If your running the 3D toss in one Jump Jet, if your running the 1X add a 5th ML. Shaken not stirred.
#4
Posted 23 March 2015 - 06:46 PM
MischiefSC, on 23 March 2015 - 06:34 PM, said:
Yeah. Here's a build that goes 82kph.
This thread is going to get locked, and should be, as flat out name and shame as well as a named accusation of cheating.
Plus it's not just wrong but silly wrong.
Uncool, plus reported, plus you're wrong.
My only thought is the recent decouple of size of mech to climb speed has boosted the hill climb rate of some mechs.
Anyway.. They don't seems to be much faster than the Victors.
#5
Posted 23 March 2015 - 06:51 PM
Beware of the Fastphract apocalypse!
#6
Posted 23 March 2015 - 06:54 PM
#7
Posted 23 March 2015 - 07:00 PM
#8
Posted 23 March 2015 - 07:08 PM
Vas79, on 23 March 2015 - 07:00 PM, said:
Well obviously we can't trust the word of a guy who runs a full 12 man of hackers
#9
Posted 23 March 2015 - 07:15 PM
MischiefSC, on 23 March 2015 - 06:34 PM, said:
Yeah. Here's a build that goes 82kph.
This thread is going to get locked, and should be, as flat out name and shame as well as a named accusation of cheating.
Plus it's not just wrong but silly wrong.
Uncool, plus reported, plus you're wrong.
Actually, I posted it because given [APOC], I knew it was just good ol' fashioned 'Mech building. Anything that gets people going "HAX!" has got to be a good build.
Heck, I've been accused of hacking because I killed people. With machine guns. LOL.
#10
Posted 23 March 2015 - 07:17 PM
Quote
Obviously. And don't let the fact that the Crab was going backwards affect anyones view of this. It's amazing that a 'phract can keep up with a Crab going in reverse. </sarcasm>
And this isn't a "name and shame". He got the name part right, but the Kong-ite should be ashamed. I dare him to report it. In fact, I double-dog dare him.
Just a classic case of someone losing and going directly to "it must be a hack". Lame, but not surprising.
*Edit because wanderer clarified his position. I was actually worried there for a sec.
Edited by Cael Voltek, 23 March 2015 - 07:18 PM.
#11
Posted 24 March 2015 - 06:44 AM
I was accused of hacking by some members of my own team of pugs when I used the advanced zoom module.
They've never seen it. This was when the resolution was a piece of sh*t too.
WML
#12
Posted 24 March 2015 - 07:16 AM
#13
Posted 24 March 2015 - 02:48 PM
#14
Posted 24 March 2015 - 03:15 PM
MischiefSC, on 23 March 2015 - 06:34 PM, said:
Yeah. Here's a build that goes 82kph.
You could do even better (more ammo and heatsinks):
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...dff6ae6f896aa2e
#15
Posted 27 March 2015 - 10:12 AM
#16
Posted 27 March 2015 - 10:32 AM
Fair enough compromise.
Edited by wanderer, 27 March 2015 - 10:33 AM.
#17
Posted 25 April 2015 - 11:05 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users